Jain Parul, Knight Bruce W, Victor Jonathan D
Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, NY, United States.
Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States.
Front Neuroinform. 2023 Apr 21;17:1113988. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2023.1113988. eCollection 2023.
In the analysis of neural data, measures of non-Gaussianity are generally applied in two ways: as tests of normality for validating model assumptions and as Independent Component Analysis (ICA) contrast functions for separating non-Gaussian signals. Consequently, there is a wide range of methods for both applications, but they all have trade-offs. We propose a new strategy that, in contrast to previous methods, directly approximates the shape of a distribution via Hermite functions. Applicability as a normality test was evaluated via its sensitivity to non-Gaussianity for three families of distributions that deviate from a Gaussian distribution in different ways (modes, tails, and asymmetry). Applicability as an ICA contrast function was evaluated through its ability to extract non-Gaussian signals in simple multi-dimensional distributions, and to remove artifacts from simulated electroencephalographic datasets. The measure has advantages as a normality test and, for ICA, for heavy-tailed and asymmetric distributions with small sample sizes. For other distributions and large datasets, it performs comparably to existing methods. Compared to standard normality tests, the new method performs better for certain types of distributions. Compared to contrast functions of a standard ICA package, the new method has advantages but its utility for ICA is more limited. This highlights that even though both applications-normality tests and ICA-require a measure of deviation from normality, strategies that are advantageous in one application may not be advantageous in the other. Here, the new method has broad merits as a normality test but only limited advantages for ICA.
在神经数据分析中,非高斯性度量通常有两种应用方式:作为验证模型假设的正态性检验,以及作为分离非高斯信号的独立成分分析(ICA)对比函数。因此,这两种应用都有各种各样的方法,但它们都存在权衡。我们提出了一种新策略,与先前的方法不同,该策略通过埃尔米特函数直接逼近分布的形状。作为正态性检验的适用性通过其对三种以不同方式(众数、尾部和不对称性)偏离高斯分布的分布族的非高斯性的敏感性来评估。作为ICA对比函数的适用性通过其在简单多维分布中提取非高斯信号以及从模拟脑电图数据集中去除伪迹的能力来评估。该度量作为正态性检验具有优势,对于ICA而言,对于小样本量的重尾和不对称分布也具有优势。对于其他分布和大型数据集,它的表现与现有方法相当。与标准正态性检验相比,新方法在某些类型的分布上表现更好。与标准ICA软件包的对比函数相比,新方法具有优势,但其在ICA中的效用更有限。这突出表明,尽管正态性检验和ICA这两种应用都需要偏离正态性的度量,但在一种应用中具有优势的策略在另一种应用中可能并不具有优势。在此,新方法作为正态性检验具有广泛的优点,但在ICA方面只有有限的优势。