McKeown M J, Makeig S, Brown G G, Jung T P, Kindermann S S, Bell A J, Sejnowski T J
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92186-5800, USA.
Hum Brain Mapp. 1998;6(3):160-88. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:3<160::AID-HBM5>3.0.CO;2-1.
Current analytical techniques applied to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data require a priori knowledge or specific assumptions about the time courses of processes contributing to the measured signals. Here we describe a new method for analyzing fMRI data based on the independent component analysis (ICA) algorithm of Bell and Sejnowski ([1995]: Neural Comput 7:1129-1159). We decomposed eight fMRI data sets from 4 normal subjects performing Stroop color-naming, the Brown and Peterson work/number task, and control tasks into spatially independent components. Each component consisted of voxel values at fixed three-dimensional locations (a component "map"), and a unique associated time course of activation. Given data from 144 time points collected during a 6-min trial, ICA extracted an equal number of spatially independent components. In all eight trials, ICA derived one and only one component with a time course closely matching the time course of 40-sec alternations between experimental and control tasks. The regions of maximum activity in these consistently task-related components generally overlapped active regions detected by standard correlational analysis, but included frontal regions not detected by correlation. Time courses of other ICA components were transiently task-related, quasiperiodic, or slowly varying. By utilizing higher-order statistics to enforce successively stricter criteria for spatial independence between component maps, both the ICA algorithm and a related fourth-order decomposition technique (Comon [1994]: Signal Processing 36:11-20) were superior to principal component analysis (PCA) in determining the spatial and temporal extent of task-related activation. For each subject, the time courses and active regions of the task-related ICA components were consistent across trials and were robust to the addition of simulated noise. Simulated movement artifact and simulated task-related activations added to actual fMRI data were clearly separated by the algorithm. ICA can be used to distinguish between nontask-related signal components, movements, and other artifacts, as well as consistently or transiently task-related fMRI activations, based on only weak assumptions about their spatial distributions and without a priori assumptions about their time courses. ICA appears to be a highly promising method for the analysis of fMRI data from normal and clinical populations, especially for uncovering unpredictable transient patterns of brain activity associated with performance of psychomotor tasks.
当前应用于功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据的分析技术需要关于对测量信号有贡献的过程的时间进程的先验知识或特定假设。在此,我们描述一种基于Bell和Sejnowski([1995]:《神经计算》7:1129 - 1159)的独立成分分析(ICA)算法来分析fMRI数据的新方法。我们将来自4名正常受试者执行Stroop颜色命名任务、Brown和Peterson工作/数字任务以及对照任务的8个fMRI数据集分解为空间上独立的成分。每个成分由固定三维位置处的体素值(一个成分“图谱”)以及一个独特的相关激活时间进程组成。在一次6分钟的试验中收集了144个时间点的数据,ICA提取了相同数量的空间独立成分。在所有8次试验中,ICA都得出了且仅得出了一个成分,其时间进程与实验任务和对照任务之间40秒交替的时间进程紧密匹配。这些始终与任务相关的成分中最大活动区域通常与通过标准相关分析检测到的活跃区域重叠,但包括了通过相关性未检测到的额叶区域。其他ICA成分的时间进程与任务有短暂相关性、呈准周期性或缓慢变化。通过利用高阶统计量来对成分图谱之间的空间独立性依次施加更严格的标准,ICA算法以及一种相关的四阶分解技术(Comon [1994]:《信号处理》36:11 - 20)在确定与任务相关激活的空间和时间范围方面优于主成分分析(PCA)。对于每个受试者,与任务相关的ICA成分的时间进程和活跃区域在各次试验中是一致的,并且对添加模拟噪声具有鲁棒性。该算法能清晰地分离添加到实际fMRI数据中的模拟运动伪影和模拟任务相关激活。基于关于其空间分布的仅有的微弱假设且无需关于其时间进程的先验假设,ICA可用于区分与任务无关的信号成分、运动和其他伪影,以及始终或短暂与任务相关的fMRI激活。ICA似乎是一种非常有前景的方法,可用于分析来自正常和临床人群的fMRI数据,特别是用于揭示与心理运动任务表现相关的不可预测的短暂脑活动模式。