• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生长结构和固定矫治器对定制卷积神经网络自动头影测量标志点识别的影响。

Influence of growth structures and fixed appliances on automated cephalometric landmark recognition with a customized convolutional neural network.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.

Department of Statistics, Statistical Consultation Unit, StaBLab, LMU Munich, Akademiestr. 1, 80799, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 10;23(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02984-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-023-02984-2
PMID:37165409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10173502/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One of the main uses of artificial intelligence in the field of orthodontics is automated cephalometric analysis. Aim of the present study was to evaluate whether developmental stages of a dentition, fixed orthodontic appliances or other dental appliances may affect detection of cephalometric landmarks.

METHODS

For the purposes of this study a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for automated detection of cephalometric landmarks was developed. The model was trained on 430 cephalometric radiographs and its performance was then tested on 460 new radiographs. The accuracy of landmark detection in patients with permanent dentition was compared with that in patients with mixed dentition. Furthermore, the influence of fixed orthodontic appliances and orthodontic brackets and/or bands was investigated only in patients with permanent dentition. A t-test was performed to evaluate the mean radial errors (MREs) against the corresponding SDs for each landmark in the two categories, of which the significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The study showed significant differences in the recognition accuracy of the Ap-Inferior point and the Is-Superior point between patients with permanent dentition and mixed dentition, and no significant differences in the recognition process between patients without fixed orthodontic appliances and patients with orthodontic brackets and/or bands and other fixed orthodontic appliances.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that growth structures and developmental stages of a dentition had an impact on the performance of the customized CNN model by dental cephalometric landmarks. Fixed orthodontic appliances such as brackets, bands, and other fixed orthodontic appliances, had no significant effect on the performance of the CNN model.

摘要

背景

人工智能在口腔正畸领域的主要应用之一是自动头影测量分析。本研究旨在评估牙列的发育阶段、固定正畸矫治器或其他牙科矫治器是否会影响头影测量标志点的检测。

方法

本研究开发了一种用于自动检测头影测量标志点的卷积神经网络(CNN)。该模型在 430 张头颅侧位片上进行了训练,然后在 460 张新的头颅侧位片上进行了测试。比较了恒牙列患者和混合牙列患者的标志点检测准确性。此外,仅在恒牙列患者中研究了固定正畸矫治器和正畸托槽和/或带的影响。对两种类别中的每个标志点的平均径向误差(MRE)与相应的标准差(SD)进行 t 检验,以评估差异的显著性,显著性水平设为 p < 0.05。

结果

研究表明,恒牙列患者和混合牙列患者的 Ap-下点和 Is-上点的识别准确率存在显著差异,无固定正畸矫治器的患者和有正畸托槽和/或带及其他固定正畸矫治器的患者的识别过程无显著差异。

结论

结果表明,牙列的生长结构和发育阶段对头影测量标志点的定制 CNN 模型的性能有影响。固定正畸矫治器,如托槽、带及其他固定正畸矫治器,对 CNN 模型的性能没有显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782f/10173502/8c18575f3f65/12903_2023_2984_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782f/10173502/8c18575f3f65/12903_2023_2984_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782f/10173502/8c18575f3f65/12903_2023_2984_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of growth structures and fixed appliances on automated cephalometric landmark recognition with a customized convolutional neural network.生长结构和固定矫治器对定制卷积神经网络自动头影测量标志点识别的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 10;23(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02984-2.
2
[Automated cephalometric landmark identification and location based on convolutional neural network].基于卷积神经网络的自动头影测量标志点识别与定位
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 9;58(12):1249-1256. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20230829-00118.
3
Artificial intelligence in orthodontics : Evaluation of a fully automated cephalometric analysis using a customized convolutional neural network.正畸学中的人工智能:使用定制卷积神经网络对全自动头影测量分析的评估
J Orofac Orthop. 2020 Jan;81(1):52-68. doi: 10.1007/s00056-019-00203-8. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
4
FIXED OR REMOVABLE APPLIANCE FOR EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANTERIOR CROSSBITE.用于功能性前牙反合早期正畸治疗的固定或可摘矫治器。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2015(238):10-72.
5
Automated cephalometric landmark detection with confidence regions using Bayesian convolutional neural networks.基于贝叶斯卷积神经网络的具有置信区域的自动头影测量标志点检测。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01256-7.
6
Accuracy and clinical validity of automated cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural networks.基于卷积神经网络的自动头影测量分析的准确性和临床有效性。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Feb;27(1):64-77. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12683. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
7
Deep learning for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on lateral cephalometric radiographs using the Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network: a pilot study.基于掩模区域卷积神经网络的侧位头颅侧位片头影测量标志点自动检测的深度学习:一项初步研究。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2024 May;137(5):554-562. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.02.003. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
8
Automatic localization of cephalometric landmarks based on convolutional neural network.基于卷积神经网络的头影测量标志点自动定位。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Mar;161(3):e250-e259. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.09.012. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
9
Deep convolutional neural network-based automated segmentation and classification of teeth with orthodontic brackets on cone-beam computed-tomographic images: a validation study.基于深度卷积神经网络的锥束计算机断层扫描图像上带正畸托槽牙齿的自动分割与分类:一项验证研究
Eur J Orthod. 2023 Mar 31;45(2):169-174. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac047.
10
Are there differences in treatment effects between labial and lingual fixed orthodontic appliances? A systematic review and meta-analysis.唇侧和舌侧固定正畸矫治器的治疗效果是否存在差异?系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Nov 22;17(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0424-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the FARNet neural network algorithm accurately identify Posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks?FARNet 神经网络算法能否准确识别后前头颅定位标志点?
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01478-z.
2
Comparative evaluation of commercially available AI-based cephalometric tracing programs.基于人工智能的头影测量追踪程序的商业应用比较评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):1241. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05032-9.
3
Prediction of Pubertal Mandibular Growth in Males with Class II Malocclusion by Utilizing Machine Learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the accuracy of automated cephalometric analysis based on artificial intelligence.基于人工智能的自动头影测量分析准确性评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02881-8.
2
Sex determination from lateral cephalometric radiographs using an automated deep learning convolutional neural network.使用自动深度学习卷积神经网络从头颅侧位X线片进行性别判定。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2022 Sep;52(3):239-244. doi: 10.5624/isd.20220016. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
3
Comparison of AudaxCeph®'s fully automated cephalometric tracing technology to a semi-automated approach by human examiners.
利用机器学习预测男性安氏II类错牙合患者的青春期下颌生长
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 21;13(16):2713. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13162713.
4
Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in a Cephalometric Analysis: A Narrative Review.人工智能在头影测量分析中的应用:一项叙述性综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 10;13(16):2640. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13162640.
比较 AudaxCeph ® 的全自动头影测量追踪技术与人类检查者的半自动方法。
Int Orthod. 2022 Dec;20(4):100691. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100691. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
4
Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate-A Systematic Review.人工智能和机器学习在唇腭裂儿童中的临床应用——系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 31;19(17):10860. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710860.
5
Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software.基于数字手动和基于网络的人工智能头影测量追踪软件的头影测量比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2022 Aug 15;27(4):e222112. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.27.4.e222112.oar. eCollection 2022.
6
Evaluation and comparison of smartphone application tracing, web based artificial intelligence tracing and conventional hand tracing methods.智能手机应用追踪、基于网络的人工智能追踪与传统人工追踪方法的评估与比较。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Nov;123(6):e906-e915. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.07.017. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
7
Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software.基于深度卷积神经网络的头影测量图像骨骼分类与自动描记软件的比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 8;12(1):11659. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15856-6.
8
Cephalometric Analysis in Orthodontics Using Artificial Intelligence-A Comprehensive Review.口腔正畸学中的人工智能头影测量分析——全面综述。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jun 16;2022:1880113. doi: 10.1155/2022/1880113. eCollection 2022.
9
Automatic Classification for Sagittal Craniofacial Patterns Based on Different Convolutional Neural Networks.基于不同卷积神经网络的矢状颅面模式自动分类
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 31;12(6):1359. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061359.
10
Evaluation of fully automated cephalometric measurements obtained from web-based artificial intelligence driven platform.基于网络的人工智能驱动平台获取的全自动头影测量评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02170-w.