Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Jalan Broga, Semeniyih, Malaysia.
CNS Drugs. 2023 May;37(5):381-397. doi: 10.1007/s40263-023-01005-8. Epub 2023 May 11.
For some adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), nonstimulants need to be considered either as a monotherapy or as an adjunct to stimulants.
The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to assess the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of nonstimulants in adults with ADHD.
Data sources, searches, and study selection were based on a previously published network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) by Cortese at al. (Lancet Psychiatry 5(9):727-738, 2018), which we updated in March 2022. Specifically, we searched PubMed, BIOSIS Previews, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, OpenGrey, Web of Science Core Collection, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (UK and Ireland), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (abstracts and international), and the WHO International Trials Registry Platform, including ClinicalTrials.gov for double-blind RCTs with a placebo arm, lasting at least one week, including adults with a diagnosis of ADHD based on DSM-III, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV(TR), DSM-5 or ICD-9- or 10, and reporting data on efficacy, tolerability (drop-out due to side effects) and acceptability (drop-out due to any cause) of guanfacine, clonidine, or atomoxetine. Additionally, we searched for RCTs of viloxazine extended release (ER), approved for ADHD in 2021. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted, and the risk of bias for individual RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
We included 18 studies in the meta-analyses (4308 participants) plus one additional study in the narrative synthesis (374 participants). The meta-analysis showed that atomoxetine (15 RCTs) (Hedge's g = - 0.48, 95% CI [- 0.64; - 0.33]), guanfacine (two RCTs) (Hedge's g = - 0.66, 95% CI [- 0.94; - 0.38]) and viloxazine ER (one RCT) were significantly more efficacious than placebo. Atomoxetine was less well tolerated than placebo, while tolerability of guanfacine and viloxazine ER could not be meta-analysed, since only one study, for each medication, reported on it.
All investigated nonstimulants were more efficacious in the treatment of ADHD in adults, than placebo, while the placebo had better acceptability and tolerability.
https://osf.io/5vnmt/?view_only=2bf87ed12ba94645babedceeee4c0120 .
对于一些患有注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的成年人来说,需要考虑非兴奋剂作为单一疗法或兴奋剂的辅助疗法。
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估非兴奋剂在成人 ADHD 中的疗效、可接受性和耐受性。
数据来源、搜索和研究选择基于 Cortese 等人之前发表的非兴奋剂治疗成人 ADHD 的随机对照试验(RCT)的网络荟萃分析(Lancet Psychiatry 5(9):727-738, 2018),我们于 2022 年 3 月进行了更新。具体来说,我们在 PubMed、BIOSIS Previews、CINAHL、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、EMBASE、ERIC、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、OpenGrey、Web of Science 核心合集、ProQuest 学位论文和论文(英国和爱尔兰)、ProQuest 学位论文和论文(摘要和国际)以及世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台上进行了搜索,包括 ClinicalTrials.gov,以查找有安慰剂对照臂、持续至少一周的双盲 RCT,包括基于 DSM-III、DSM-III-R、DSM-IV(TR)、DSM-5 或 ICD-9 或 10 诊断为 ADHD 的成年人,并报告胍法辛、可乐定或托莫西汀的疗效、耐受性(因副作用而退出)和可接受性(因任何原因而退出)的数据。此外,我们还搜索了 2021 年批准用于 ADHD 的维洛沙嗪缓释片(ER)的 RCT。进行了随机效应荟萃分析,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估了个体 RCT 的偏倚风险。
我们的荟萃分析纳入了 18 项研究(4308 名参与者)和一项叙述性综合研究(374 名参与者)。荟萃分析显示,托莫西汀(15 项 RCT)(Hedge's g = -0.48, 95% CI [-0.64; -0.33])、胍法辛(两项 RCT)(Hedge's g = -0.66, 95% CI [-0.94; -0.38])和维洛沙嗪 ER(一项 RCT)的疗效明显优于安慰剂。托莫西汀的耐受性不如安慰剂,而胍法辛和维洛沙嗪 ER 的耐受性不能进行荟萃分析,因为每种药物只有一项研究报告了这方面的数据。
所有研究的非兴奋剂在治疗成人 ADHD 方面均比安慰剂更有效,而安慰剂的可接受性和耐受性更好。
https://osf.io/5vnmt/?view_only=2bf87ed12ba94645babedceeee4c0120。