Suppr超能文献

评估美国医师执照考试第一步采用及格/不及格计分方式对病理学住院医师选拔的影响。

Evaluating the impact of pass/fail United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scoring on pathology residency selection.

作者信息

Fujihashi Ayaka, Yang Lydia C, Haynes William, Patel Om U, Burge Kaitlin, Yadav Ishant, Van Wagoner Nicholas, McCleskey Brandi

机构信息

Marnix E. Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

Acad Pathol. 2023 Apr 25;10(2):100083. doi: 10.1016/j.acpath.2023.100083. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Beginning 26 January 2022, the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 changed from a numerical score to Pass/Fail. Historically, residency programs have used Step 1 scores as a valuable metric in assessing the competitiveness of applicants. We assessed how residency program criteria will change when evaluating applicants after Step 1 becomes Pass/Fail. A survey was distributed to the program directors of all 144 pathology residency programs accredited by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Survey questions evaluated the importance of using Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores when assessing applicants. Participants were asked to rank a list of applicant criteria used before and after Step 1 becomes Pass/Fail. Data were analyzed using chi-squared and paired -tests with significance at  < 0.05. A total of 34 residency program directors (23.6%) responded to the survey. 76.5% (< 0.001) of responders believed Step 1 scores were able to predict a resident's ability to pass their board exams, while 41.2% believed Step 2 CK could predict a resident's ability to pass board exams and perform clinically in pathology ( = 0.282). 61.8% of responders agreed that an applicant's medical school ranking would become more important ( = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the relative importance of 16 selection criteria after the change of Step 1 to Pass/Fail. It does not appear that Step 2 CK will become more important. Although results are constrained by a 23.6% response rate, it can be a start to guiding future students through residency applications.

摘要

从2022年1月26日起,美国医师执照考试第一步从分数制改为通过/不通过制。从历史上看,住院医师培训项目一直将第一步考试成绩作为评估申请人竞争力的重要指标。我们评估了在第一步考试改为通过/不通过制后,住院医师培训项目在评估申请人时的标准将如何变化。我们向毕业后医学教育认证委员会认证的所有144个病理学住院医师培训项目的项目主任发放了一份调查问卷。调查问题评估了在评估申请人时使用第一步和第二步临床知识(CK)成绩的重要性。参与者被要求对第一步考试改为通过/不通过制前后使用的申请人标准列表进行排序。使用卡方检验和配对检验分析数据,显著性水平为<0.05。共有34名住院医师培训项目主任(23.6%)回复了调查。76.5%(<0.001)的受访者认为第一步考试成绩能够预测住院医师通过委员会考试的能力,而41.2%的受访者认为第二步CK考试成绩能够预测住院医师通过委员会考试和在病理学领域临床实践的能力(P = 0.282)。61.8%的受访者同意申请人的医学院排名将变得更加重要(P = 0.001)。在第一步考试改为通过/不通过制后,16项选拔标准的相对重要性没有显著差异。似乎第二步CK考试成绩不会变得更加重要。尽管结果受到23.6%的回复率的限制,但它可以作为指导未来学生进行住院医师申请的一个开端。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae80/10164826/7ff4761686ed/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验