Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
RMD Open. 2023 May;9(2). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002883.
We aimed to compare the proportions of patients with newly diagnosed psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remaining on methotrexate (regardless of other disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-changes), and proportions not having started another DMARD (regardless of methotrexate discontinuation), within 2 years of starting methotrexate, as well as methotrexate effectiveness.
Patients with DMARD-naïve, newly diagnosed PsA, starting methotrexate 2011-2019, were identified from high-quality national Swedish registers and matched 1:1 to comparable patients with RA. Proportions remaining on methotrexate and not starting another DMARD were calculated. For patients with disease activity data at baseline and 6 months, response to methotrexate monotherapy was compared through logistic regression, applying non-responder imputation.
In total, 3642/3642 patients with PsA/RA were included. Baseline patient-reported pain and global health were similar, whereas patients with RA had higher 28-joint scores and evaluator-assessed disease activity. Two years after methotrexate start, 71% of PsA vs 76% of patients with RA remained on methotrexate, 66% vs 60% had not started any other DMARD, and 77% vs 74% had not started specifically a biological or targeted synthetic DMARD. At 6 months, the proportions of patients with PsA versus RA achieving pain-scores ≤15 mm were 26% vs 36%; global health ≤20 mm: 32% vs 42%; evaluator-assessed 'remission': 20% vs 27%, with corresponding adjusted ORs (PsA vs RA) of 0.63 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.85); 0.57 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.76) and 0.54 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.75).
In Swedish clinical practice, methotrexate use is similar in PsA and RA, both regarding initiation of other DMARDs and methotrexate retention. On a group level, disease activity improved during methotrexate monotherapy in both diseases, although more so in RA.
我们旨在比较在开始使用甲氨蝶呤(无论是否改变了其他疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARD))后 2 年内,新诊断的银屑病关节炎(PsA)和类风湿关节炎(RA)患者继续使用甲氨蝶呤(无论是否停止使用甲氨蝶呤)的比例,以及未开始使用另一种 DMARD 的比例(无论是否停止使用甲氨蝶呤),以及甲氨蝶呤的疗效。
从高质量的瑞典国家登记处确定了新诊断为 DMARD 初治的、开始使用甲氨蝶呤 2011-2019 年的 PsA 患者,并与可比的 RA 患者进行了 1:1 匹配。计算继续使用甲氨蝶呤和未开始使用另一种 DMARD 的比例。对于基线和 6 个月时有疾病活动数据的患者,通过逻辑回归比较甲氨蝶呤单药治疗的反应,应用无应答者插补。
共有 3642/3642 例 PsA/RA 患者纳入研究。基线时患者报告的疼痛和总体健康状况相似,但 RA 患者的 28 个关节评分和评估者评估的疾病活动度更高。开始使用甲氨蝶呤后 2 年,71%的 PsA 患者与 76%的 RA 患者继续使用甲氨蝶呤,66%的患者与 60%的患者未开始使用任何其他 DMARD,77%的患者与 74%的患者未开始使用特定的生物或靶向合成 DMARD。在 6 个月时,与 RA 相比,PsA 患者达到疼痛评分≤15mm 的比例为 26%vs36%;全球健康评分≤20mm:32%vs42%;评估者评估的“缓解”:20%vs27%,相应的调整后比值比(PsA vs RA)为 0.63(95%CI 0.47 至 0.85);0.57(95%CI 0.42 至 0.76)和 0.54(95%CI 0.39 至 0.75)。
在瑞典的临床实践中,甲氨蝶呤在 PsA 和 RA 中的使用情况相似,无论是开始使用其他 DMARD 还是保留甲氨蝶呤。在群体水平上,两种疾病在使用甲氨蝶呤单药治疗期间疾病活动均有所改善,尽管 RA 更为明显。