• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较增加氡知识和家庭测试的沟通方法:高氡城市的随机对照试验。

Comparing Communication Methods to Increase Radon Knowledge and Home Testing: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a High-Radon City.

机构信息

Department of Communication, College of Arts and Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.

Department of Population Health, School of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 25;20(9):5634. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095634.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20095634
PMID:37174154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10178454/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Exposure to residential radon is a preventable cause of cancer. Prevention requires testing, but the percentage of homes that have been tested is small. One reason for the low testing rates may be that printed brochures fail to motivate people to obtain and return a radon test.

METHODS

We developed a radon app for smartphones that contained the same information as printed brochures. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial that compared the app to brochures in a population comprised largely of homeowners. Cognitive endpoints included radon knowledge, attitudes toward testing, perceived severity and susceptibility to radon, and response and self-efficacy. Behavioral endpoints were participants' requests for a free radon test and the return of the test to the lab. Participants (N = 116) were residents of Grand Forks, North Dakota, a city with one of the nation's highest radon levels. Data were analyzed by general linear models and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Participants in both conditions showed significant increases in radon knowledge ( < 0.001), perceived susceptibility ( < 0.001), and self-efficacy ( = 0.004). There was a significant interaction, with app users showing greater increases. After controlling for income, app users were three times more likely to request a free radon test. However, contrary to expectation, app users were 70% less likely to return it to the lab ( < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm the superiority of smartphones in stimulating radon test requests. We speculate that the advantage of brochures in promoting test returns may be due to their ability to serve as physical reminders.

摘要

简介

接触住宅氡是可预防的癌症原因。预防需要进行测试,但接受测试的家庭比例很小。测试率低的一个原因可能是印刷手册未能促使人们获取并返回氡测试。

方法

我们为智能手机开发了一个氡应用程序,其中包含与印刷手册相同的信息。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,将该应用程序与主要由房主组成的人群中的手册进行了比较。认知终点包括氡知识、对测试的态度、对氡的感知严重程度和易感性,以及反应和自我效能。行为终点是参与者对免费氡测试的请求以及将测试返回实验室。参与者(N=116)是北达科他州大福克斯市的居民,该市的氡水平是全国最高的城市之一。数据通过一般线性模型和逻辑回归进行分析。

结果

两种情况下的参与者氡知识(<0.001)、感知易感性(<0.001)和自我效能感(=0.004)均显着增加。有一个显着的相互作用,应用程序用户的增加幅度更大。在控制收入后,申请免费氡测试的应用程序用户的可能性是其三倍。然而,与预期相反,应用程序用户将其返回实验室的可能性降低了 70%(<0.01)。

结论

我们的研究结果证实了智能手机在刺激氡测试请求方面的优越性。我们推测,手册在促进测试返回方面的优势可能归因于它们作为物理提醒的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c2/10178454/653f7f198549/ijerph-20-05634-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c2/10178454/b4438faf3e76/ijerph-20-05634-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c2/10178454/6c1eb55e9753/ijerph-20-05634-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c2/10178454/653f7f198549/ijerph-20-05634-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c2/10178454/b4438faf3e76/ijerph-20-05634-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c2/10178454/6c1eb55e9753/ijerph-20-05634-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c2/10178454/653f7f198549/ijerph-20-05634-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing Communication Methods to Increase Radon Knowledge and Home Testing: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a High-Radon City.比较增加氡知识和家庭测试的沟通方法:高氡城市的随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 25;20(9):5634. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095634.
2
Interventions to promote home radon testing: A randomized clinical trial of a smartphone app vs. printed brochures.促进家庭氡气检测的干预措施:智能手机应用程序与印刷小册子的随机临床试验。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):2027-2032. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4988. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
3
Communicating radon risk via a smartphone app: a pilot intervention study.通过智能手机应用程序传播氡风险:一项试点干预研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 22;20(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08677-7.
4
An examination of radon awareness, risk communication, and radon risk reduction in a Hispanic community.对一个西班牙裔社区中的氡意识、风险沟通和氡风险降低情况的考察。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2020 Jun;96(6):803-813. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2020.1730013. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
5
Residential radon testing intentions, perceived radon severity, and tobacco use.住宅氡检测意向、感知到的氡危害程度与烟草使用情况。
J Environ Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;76(6):42-7.
6
An investigation into the knowledge and attitudes towards radon testing among residents in a high radon area.对高氡地区居民关于氡检测的知识和态度的调查。
J Radiol Prot. 2012 Dec;32(4):N141-7. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/32/4/N141. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
7
Radon mitigation survey among New York State residents living in high radon homes.对居住在高氡气房屋中的纽约州居民进行的氡气减排调查。
Health Phys. 1999 Oct;77(4):403-9. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199910000-00007.
8
Radon Knowledge and Practices Among Family Physicians in a High Radon State.高氡含量地区家庭医生的氡知识与实践
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 May-Jun;34(3):602-607. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200553.
9
A Randomized Trial to Test Personalized Environmental Report Back to Reduce Lung Cancer Risk.一项旨在通过个性化环境报告回馈来降低肺癌风险的随机试验。
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Feb;46(1):165-175. doi: 10.1177/1090198118788602. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
10
Radon testing behavior in a sample of individuals with high home radon screening measurements.家庭氡筛查测量值较高的个体样本中的氡检测行为。
Risk Anal. 1993 Aug;13(4):441-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00744.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing Residential Radon Testing Through Outreach to Families of Newborn Children in Pennsylvania: Evaluation of Intervention Outcomes, 2002-2023.通过对宾夕法尼亚州新生儿家庭进行宣传来增加住宅氡检测:2002 - 2023年干预结果评估
AJPM Focus. 2025 May 23;4(4):100372. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100372. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Behaviourally-informed household communications increase uptake of radon tests in a randomised controlled trial.行为导向的家庭沟通提高了氡气测试在随机对照试验中的采用率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 21;13(1):20401. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47832-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental radon and childhood asthma.环境中的氡与儿童哮喘。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022 Dec;57(12):3165-3168. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26143. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
2
Interventions to promote home radon testing: A randomized clinical trial of a smartphone app vs. printed brochures.促进家庭氡气检测的干预措施:智能手机应用程序与印刷小册子的随机临床试验。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):2027-2032. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4988. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
3
College students' attachment to their smartphones: a subjective operant approach.大学生对智能手机的依恋:一种主观操作性方法。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jun 8;10(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00857-x.
4
Radon Knowledge and Practices Among Family Physicians in a High Radon State.高氡含量地区家庭医生的氡知识与实践
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 May-Jun;34(3):602-607. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200553.
5
Social Determinants of Health, Environmental Exposures and Home Radon Testing.健康的社会决定因素、环境暴露与家庭氡检测。
West J Nurs Res. 2022 Jul;44(7):636-642. doi: 10.1177/01939459211009561. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
6
Exposure to Residential Radon and COPD: A Systematic Review.接触室内氡与慢性阻塞性肺疾病:一项系统评价。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Apr 28;15:939-948. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S245982. eCollection 2020.
7
Communicating radon risk via a smartphone app: a pilot intervention study.通过智能手机应用程序传播氡风险:一项试点干预研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 22;20(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08677-7.
8
The prevalence of stroke according to indoor radon concentration in South Koreans: Nationwide cross section study.韩国人中风患病率与室内氡浓度的关系:全国性横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(4):e18859. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018859.
9
Mailed Outreach Is Superior to Usual Care Alone for Colorectal Cancer Screening in the USA: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.邮寄外展服务优于美国常规护理单独用于结直肠癌筛查:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Sep;64(9):2489-2496. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05587-6. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
10
Radon and lung cancer: What does the public really know?氡与肺癌:公众究竟了解多少?
J Environ Radioact. 2018 Dec;192:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jun 5.