• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行为导向的家庭沟通提高了氡气测试在随机对照试验中的采用率。

Behaviourally-informed household communications increase uptake of radon tests in a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Economic and Social Research Institute, Whitaker Square, Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Dublin, Ireland.

School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 21;13(1):20401. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47832-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-47832-z
PMID:37990108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10663451/
Abstract

Exposure to radon gas is a leading cause of lung cancer. Testing homes for the gas is straightforward, yet most people do not undertake tests even when offered freely. We report a pre-registered randomised controlled trial of communications to encourage test uptake. Households (N = 3500) in areas at high risk of radon exposure were randomly assigned to receive (i) a the control letter from the national Environmental Protection Agency; (ii) a behaviourally-informed version of the control letter that incorporated multiple nudges, including reciprocity messages and numeric frequencies of risk; (iii) this same behaviourally-informed letter in a re-designed envelope; (iv) the behaviourally-informed letter in the re-designed enveloped with a radon risk map of the household's county. The behaviourally-informed letter led to a large increase in test uptake, from 22% in the control condition to 33% (a 50% increase). There was no additional benefit of the re-designed envelope, which generated uptake of 30%. Including the map led some households to respond faster, but the overall uptake (26%) was weaker. The results have implications for public health communications with households and show the potential for techniques from behavioural science to help mitigate environmental risks.

摘要

氡气暴露是肺癌的主要成因。检测房屋中的氡气很简单,但大多数人即使有免费检测机会也不接受检测。我们报告了一项预先注册的随机对照试验,旨在通过沟通鼓励人们进行检测。处于高氡暴露风险地区的家庭(N=3500)被随机分配接受以下干预措施:(i)来自国家环境保护局的对照信函;(ii)包含多个提示信息的对照信函,包括互惠信息和风险的数值频率;(iii)重新设计信封的同一条行为信息信函;(iv)重新设计信封的行为信息信函,以及家庭所在县的氡风险地图。行为信息信函导致检测率大幅增加,从对照条件下的 22%增加到 33%(增加 50%)。重新设计的信封没有带来额外的收益,仅增加了 30%的检测率。包含地图会促使一些家庭更快做出回应,但总体检测率(26%)较弱。结果对家庭的公共卫生沟通具有启示意义,并展示了行为科学技术帮助减轻环境风险的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50e/10663451/cb8379a94a00/41598_2023_47832_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50e/10663451/e9109b829044/41598_2023_47832_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50e/10663451/b15ceb4f6ed9/41598_2023_47832_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50e/10663451/cb8379a94a00/41598_2023_47832_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50e/10663451/e9109b829044/41598_2023_47832_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50e/10663451/b15ceb4f6ed9/41598_2023_47832_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50e/10663451/cb8379a94a00/41598_2023_47832_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Behaviourally-informed household communications increase uptake of radon tests in a randomised controlled trial.行为导向的家庭沟通提高了氡气测试在随机对照试验中的采用率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 21;13(1):20401. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47832-z.
2
Economic valuation of health benefits from using geologic data to communicate radon risk potential.利用地质数据来传达氡风险潜力的健康效益的经济评估。
Environ Health. 2020 Mar 20;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12940-020-00589-8.
3
Indoor radon: a case study in risk communication.室内氡:风险沟通的一个案例研究。
Am J Prev Med. 1994 May-Jun;10(3 Suppl):15-8.
4
Assessment and management of residential radon health risks: a report from the health Canada radon workshop.住宅氡健康风险的评估与管理:加拿大卫生部氡研讨会报告
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006 Apr;69(7):735-58. doi: 10.1080/15287390500261281.
5
Radon exposure: a review of the public health risk in Anne Arundel County, Maryland.氡暴露:马里兰州安妮阿伦德尔县公共卫生风险综述
Md Med J. 1995 Mar;44(3):204-9.
6
Canadian individual risks of radon-induced lung cancer for different exposure profiles.不同暴露情况的加拿大人氡致肺癌的个体风险。
Can J Public Health. 2005 Sep-Oct;96(5):360-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03404033.
7
Can uptake of childhood influenza immunisation through schools and GP practices be increased through behaviourally-informed invitation letters and reminders: two pragmatic randomized controlled trials.通过行为信息邀请信和提醒,能否增加学校和全科医生实践中儿童流感免疫接种的吸收率:两项实用随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14439-4.
8
Assessment of Community Awareness and Practices Concerning Indoor Air Pollutants - Madison County, Alabama, June 2017.阿拉巴马州麦迪逊县室内空气污染物社区意识与实践评估 - 2017年6月
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Apr 20;67(15):447-450. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6715a3.
9
Canadian population risk of radon induced lung cancer: a re-assessment based on the recent cross-Canada radon survey.加拿大氡诱发肺癌的人群风险:基于近期全加拿大氡调查的重新评估。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 Nov;152(1-3):9-13. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncs147. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
10
Indoor radon exposure and risk of lung cancer: a nested case-control study in Finland.室内氡暴露与肺癌风险:芬兰的一项巢式病例对照研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Jul 17;88(14):966-72. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.14.966.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing Residential Radon Testing Through Outreach to Families of Newborn Children in Pennsylvania: Evaluation of Intervention Outcomes, 2002-2023.通过对宾夕法尼亚州新生儿家庭进行宣传来增加住宅氡检测:2002 - 2023年干预结果评估
AJPM Focus. 2025 May 23;4(4):100372. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100372. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing Communication Methods to Increase Radon Knowledge and Home Testing: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a High-Radon City.比较增加氡知识和家庭测试的沟通方法:高氡城市的随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 25;20(9):5634. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095634.
2
Consequences of changing Canadian activity patterns since the COVID-19 pandemic include increased residential radon gas exposure for younger people.自 COVID-19 大流行以来,加拿大活动模式的改变带来了一些后果,包括年轻人住宅内氡气暴露的增加。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 7;13(1):5735. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32416-8.
3
Social factors and behavioural reactions to radon test outcomes underlie differences in radiation exposure dose, independent of household radon level.
社会因素和对氡测试结果的行为反应是导致辐射暴露剂量差异的基础,而与家庭氡水平无关。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 14;12(1):15471. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19499-5.
4
Interventions to promote home radon testing: A randomized clinical trial of a smartphone app vs. printed brochures.促进家庭氡气检测的干预措施:智能手机应用程序与印刷小册子的随机临床试验。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):2027-2032. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4988. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
5
Suggestions for Improvements in National Radon Control Strategies of Member States Which Were Developed as a Requirement of EU Directive 2013/59 EURATOM.改善成员国国家氡控制策略的建议,这些建议是根据欧盟指令 2013/59 EURATOM 的要求制定的。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;19(7):3805. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073805.
6
Behavioural nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations.行为推动可增加 COVID-19 疫苗接种率。
Nature. 2021 Sep;597(7876):404-409. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03843-2. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
7
The efficacy of public health information for encouraging radon gas awareness and testing varies by audience age, sex and profession.公众健康信息对于鼓励氡气意识和检测的效果因受众年龄、性别和职业而异。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 7;11(1):11906. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91479-7.
8
A megastudy of text-based nudges encouraging patients to get vaccinated at an upcoming doctor's appointment.一项针对基于文本的提示进行的大规模研究,旨在鼓励患者在即将到来的医生预约时接种疫苗。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 18;118(20). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101165118.
9
Social Determinants of Health, Environmental Exposures and Home Radon Testing.健康的社会决定因素、环境暴露与家庭氡检测。
West J Nurs Res. 2022 Jul;44(7):636-642. doi: 10.1177/01939459211009561. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
10
Nudging: Progress to date and future directions.助推:迄今进展与未来方向
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2020 Nov;161(Suppl):3-19. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Dec 10.