• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证 Alogo Move Pro:一种基于 GPS 的惯性测量单元,用于客观检查马的步态和跳跃。

Validation of Alogo Move Pro: A GPS-Based Inertial Measurement Unit for the Objective Examination of Gait and Jumping in Horses.

机构信息

Information Science Institute GSEM/CUI, University of Geneva, 1227 Carouge, Switzerland.

Veterinary Department of the Swiss Armed Force, 3003 Berne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 22;23(9):4196. doi: 10.3390/s23094196.

DOI:10.3390/s23094196
PMID:37177397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10181332/
Abstract

Quantitative information on how well a horse clears a jump has great potential to support the rider in improving the horse's jumping performance. This study investigated the validation of a GPS-based inertial measurement unit, namely Alogo Move Pro, compared with a traditional optical motion capture system. Accuracy and precision of the three jumping characteristics of maximum height (Zmax), stride/jump length (lhorz), and mean horizontal speed (vhorz) were compared. Eleven horse-rider pairs repeated two identical jumps (an upright and an oxer fence) several times ( = 6 to 10) at different heights in a 20 × 60 m tent arena. The ground was a fiber sand surface. The 24 OMC (Oqus 7+, Qualisys) cameras were rigged on aluminum rails suspended 3 m above the ground. The Alogo sensor was placed in a pocket on the protective plate of the saddle girth. Reflective markers placed on and around the Alogo sensor were used to define a rigid body for kinematic analysis. The Alogo sensor data were collected and processed using the Alogo proprietary software; stride-matched OMC data were collected using Qualisys Track Manager and post-processed in Python. Residual analysis and Bland-Altman plots were performed in Python. The Alogo sensor provided measures with relative accuracy in the range of 10.5-20.7% for stride segments and 5.5-29.2% for jump segments. Regarding relative precision, we obtained values in the range of 6.3-14.5% for stride segments and 2.8-18.2% for jump segments. These accuracy differences were deemed good under field study conditions where GPS signal strength might have been suboptimal.

摘要

关于马跳跃腾空高度的定量信息,对于帮助骑手提升马匹跳跃性能具有重要意义。本研究旨在验证基于 GPS 的惯性测量单元(即 Alogo Move Pro)的准确性和精度,将其与传统光学运动捕捉系统进行对比。本研究比较了最大高度(Zmax)、步幅/跳跃长度(lhorz)和平均水平速度(vhorz)这三个跳跃特征的精度和重复性。11 对人马组合在一个 20×60 米的帐篷竞技场中,以不同高度重复进行了两次相同的跳跃(一个垂直障碍和一个奥格尔障碍),重复次数为 6 到 10 次。地面为纤维沙表面。24 个 OMC(Oqus 7+,Qualisys)摄像机安装在距地面 3 米高的铝轨上。Alogo 传感器放置在鞍座下的保护板的口袋中。在 Alogo 传感器上及其周围放置了反光标记,以定义运动学分析的刚体。Alogo 传感器数据使用 Alogo 专有软件进行收集和处理;使用 Qualisys Track Manager 收集与步幅匹配的 OMC 数据,并在 Python 中进行后处理。在 Python 中进行了残差分析和 Bland-Altman 图分析。Alogo 传感器提供的测量结果的相对精度范围为 10.5%至 20.7%,步幅段的相对精度范围为 5.5%至 29.2%,跳跃段的相对精度范围为 6.3%至 14.5%,跳跃段的相对精度范围为 2.8%至 18.2%。在 GPS 信号强度可能不理想的野外研究条件下,这些精度差异被认为是良好的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/9e706a4fd668/sensors-23-04196-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/f364b88ada60/sensors-23-04196-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/b71f8dfc94ef/sensors-23-04196-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/82b3f36828e2/sensors-23-04196-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/0ac827ad912c/sensors-23-04196-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/ddd4a2b5d259/sensors-23-04196-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/3bd4a3ce4eaa/sensors-23-04196-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/f0c6248327f8/sensors-23-04196-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/9e706a4fd668/sensors-23-04196-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/f364b88ada60/sensors-23-04196-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/b71f8dfc94ef/sensors-23-04196-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/82b3f36828e2/sensors-23-04196-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/0ac827ad912c/sensors-23-04196-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/ddd4a2b5d259/sensors-23-04196-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/3bd4a3ce4eaa/sensors-23-04196-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/f0c6248327f8/sensors-23-04196-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8388/10181332/9e706a4fd668/sensors-23-04196-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of Alogo Move Pro: A GPS-Based Inertial Measurement Unit for the Objective Examination of Gait and Jumping in Horses.验证 Alogo Move Pro:一种基于 GPS 的惯性测量单元,用于客观检查马的步态和跳跃。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 22;23(9):4196. doi: 10.3390/s23094196.
2
Validation of distal limb mounted inertial measurement unit sensors for stride detection in Warmblood horses at walk and trot.用于检测温血马行走和小跑时步幅的远端肢体安装惯性测量单元传感器的验证
Equine Vet J. 2017 Jul;49(4):545-551. doi: 10.1111/evj.12651. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
3
Inertial Sensor Technologies-Their Role in Equine Gait Analysis, a Review.惯性传感器技术——在马步态分析中的作用,综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 11;23(14):6301. doi: 10.3390/s23146301.
4
Accuracy validation of a wearable IMU-based gait analysis in healthy female.基于可穿戴惯性测量单元的健康女性步态分析的准确性验证
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Jan 2;16(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00792-3.
5
Comparison of Trotting Stance Detection Methods from an Inertial Measurement Unit Mounted on the Horse's Limb.从安装在马腿上的惯性测量单元比较小跑姿势检测方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 25;20(10):2983. doi: 10.3390/s20102983.
6
Accuracy Verification of Spatio-Temporal and Kinematic Parameters for Gait Using Inertial Measurement Unit System.使用惯性测量单元系统验证步态的时空和运动学参数的准确性。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 29;20(5):1343. doi: 10.3390/s20051343.
7
Jumping characteristics of naïve foals: lead changes and description of temporal and linear parameters.新生马驹的跳跃特征:换步及时间和线性参数描述。
Equine Vet J Suppl. 2002 Sep(34):302-7. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2002.tb05437.x.
8
The effect of rider weight and additional weight in Icelandic horses in tölt: part II. Stride parameters responses.骑手体重及额外负重对冰岛马溜蹄步态的影响:第二部分。步幅参数响应。
Animal. 2017 Sep;11(9):1567-1572. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117000568. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
9
Comparison of rider stability in a flapless saddle versus a conventional saddle.无鞍辔与传统鞍辔的骑手稳定性比较。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 6;13(6):e0196960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196960. eCollection 2018.
10
Measuring Gait Velocity and Stride Length with an Ultrawide Bandwidth Local Positioning System and an Inertial Measurement Unit.使用超宽带带宽定位系统和惯性测量单元测量步态速度和步长。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 21;21(9):2896. doi: 10.3390/s21092896.

引用本文的文献

1
A Transformer Encoder Approach for Localization Reconstruction During GPS Outages from an IMU and GPS-Based Sensor.一种基于惯性测量单元(IMU)和全球定位系统(GPS)传感器在GPS信号中断期间进行定位重建的Transformer编码器方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 17;25(2):522. doi: 10.3390/s25020522.
2
A Combined UWB/IMU Localization Method with Improved CKF.一种采用改进型无迹卡尔曼滤波器的超宽带/惯性测量单元组合定位方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 16;24(10):3165. doi: 10.3390/s24103165.
3
Socio-Technical Analysis of the Benefits and Barriers to Using a Digital Representation of the Global Horse Population in Equine Veterinary Medicine.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Markerless More or Less? Comparing a Smartphone Computer Vision Method for Equine Lameness Assessment to Multi-Camera Motion Capture.无标记法是优还是劣?将一种用于马跛行评估的智能手机计算机视觉方法与多摄像头动作捕捉进行比较。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;13(3):390. doi: 10.3390/ani13030390.
2
Artificial Intelligence for Lameness Detection in Horses-A Preliminary Study.用于马匹跛行检测的人工智能——一项初步研究。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 17;12(20):2804. doi: 10.3390/ani12202804.
3
Detection of Equine Hoof Motion by Using a Hoof-Mounted Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor in Comparison to Examinations with an Optoelectronic Technique - A Pilot Study.
马兽医领域中使用全球马种群数字表示的益处与障碍的社会技术分析
Animals (Basel). 2023 Nov 17;13(22):3557. doi: 10.3390/ani13223557.
4
Effects of wearable therapies on jump performance in sport horses.可穿戴疗法对运动马匹跳跃性能的影响。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Sep 26;10:1235932. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1235932. eCollection 2023.
5
An Improved UWB/IMU Tightly Coupled Positioning Algorithm Study.一种改进的 UWB/IMU 紧耦合定位算法研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 26;23(13):5918. doi: 10.3390/s23135918.
利用马蹄惯性测量单元传感器检测马的蹄部运动与光电技术检查的比较——一项初步研究。
J Equine Vet Sci. 2021 Jun;101:103454. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103454. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
4
On the brink of daily clinical application of objective gait analysis: What evidence do we have so far from studies using an induced lameness model?在客观步态分析即将应用于日常临床之际:到目前为止,我们从使用诱导性跛行模型的研究中获得了哪些证据?
Vet J. 2018 Apr;234:11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait.EquiMoves:用于客观检查马步态的无线网络化惯性测量系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Mar 13;18(3):850. doi: 10.3390/s18030850.
6
Do we have to redefine lameness in the era of quantitative gait analysis?在定量步态分析时代,我们是否必须重新定义跛行?
Equine Vet J. 2017 Sep;49(5):567-569. doi: 10.1111/evj.12715.
7
Understanding Bland Altman analysis.理解布兰德-奥特曼分析。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Jun 5;25(2):141-51. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.015. eCollection 2015.
8
Days-lost to training and competition in relation to workload in 263 elite show-jumping horses in four European countries.在四个欧洲国家的 263 匹精英障碍赛马中,与工作量相关的训练和比赛所损失的天数。
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Nov 1;112(3-4):387-400. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
9
Variation in training regimens in professional showjumping yards.职业场地障碍赛马场训练方案的差异。
Equine Vet J. 2014 Mar;46(2):233-8. doi: 10.1111/evj.12126. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
10
Inertial sensors for assessment of back movement in horses during locomotion over ground.用于评估马匹在地面行走时背部运动的惯性传感器。
Equine Vet J Suppl. 2010 Nov(38):417-24. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00200.x.