Suppr超能文献

主动脉瓣钙评分在各种病因导致的主动脉瓣狭窄中的诊断作用。

Diagnostic role of aortic valve calcium scoring in various etiologies of aortic stenosis.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 May 17;13(1):8019. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34118-7.

Abstract

Most of the studies about aortic valve calcium (AVC) score in aortic stenosis (AS) were based on degenerative or bicuspid AS but not rheumatic AS. We aimed to study the diagnostic accuracy of AVC score to determine severe AS in various etiologies. Adult patients diagnosed with mild to severe AS were enrolled. AVC score were identified from multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) scan. The AVC score was highest in bicuspid AS (3211.9 (IQR (1100.0-4562.4) AU) compared to degenerative AS (1803.7 (IQR (1073.6-2550.6) AU)), and rheumatic AS (875.6 (IQR 453.3-1594.0) AU), p < 0.001. For the ROC curve to identify severe AS, the AVC score performed well in degenerative and bicuspid AS with the area under the ROC curve (AuROC) 0.834 (95% CI, 0.730, 0.938) in degenerative group; and 0.820 (95% CI, 0.687, 0.953) in bicuspid AS. Whereas AVC score had non-significant diagnostic accuracy with AuROC 0.667 (95% CI, 0.357, 0.976) for male and 0.60(95% CI, 0.243, 0.957) for female in rheumatic AS. The cut-off AVC score values to identify severe AS were AVCS > 2028.9AU (male) and > 1082.5AU (female) for degenerative AS, and > 2431.8AU (male) and > 1293.5AU (female) for bicuspid AS. In conclusions, AVC score is the accurate test for assessing severity in patients with degenerative and bicuspid AS but performs poorly in rheumatic AS group.

摘要

大多数关于主动脉瓣钙化 (AVC) 评分在主动脉瓣狭窄 (AS) 中的研究都是基于退行性或二叶式 AS,而不是风湿性 AS。我们旨在研究 AVC 评分对确定各种病因严重 AS 的诊断准确性。纳入了被诊断为轻度至重度 AS 的成年患者。AVC 评分是从多排 CT (MDCT) 扫描中确定的。二叶式 AS 的 AVC 评分最高(3211.9(IQR(1100.0-4562.4)AU)),高于退行性 AS(1803.7(IQR(1073.6-2550.6)AU))和风湿性 AS(875.6(IQR 453.3-1594.0)AU)),p<0.001。对于 ROC 曲线以确定严重 AS,AVC 评分在退行性和二叶式 AS 中表现良好,退行性组的 ROC 曲线下面积 (AuROC) 为 0.834(95%CI,0.730,0.938);二叶式 AS 为 0.820(95%CI,0.687,0.953)。然而,AVC 评分在风湿性 AS 中对男性的 AuROC 为 0.667(95%CI,0.357,0.976),对女性的 AuROC 为 0.60(95%CI,0.243,0.957),诊断准确性无统计学意义。用于识别严重 AS 的截断 AVC 评分值为退行性 AS 中男性 AVCS>2028.9AU 和女性>1082.5AU,二叶式 AS 中男性>2431.8AU 和女性>1293.5AU。总之,AVC 评分是评估退行性和二叶式 AS 患者严重程度的准确测试,但在风湿性 AS 组中表现不佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验