• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲电子健康使用情况的建模与预测:基于对13000名欧盟互联网用户的在线调查的多维方法。

Modelling and Predicting eHealth Usage in Europe: A Multidimensional Approach From an Online Survey of 13,000 European Union Internet Users.

作者信息

Torrent-Sellens Joan, Díaz-Chao Ángel, Soler-Ramos Ivan, Saigí-Rubió Francesc

机构信息

Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 22;18(7):e188. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5605.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.5605
PMID:27450189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4975796/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

More advanced methods and models are needed to evaluate the participation of patients and citizens in the shared health care model that eHealth proposes.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of our study was to design and evaluate a predictive multidimensional model of eHealth usage.

METHODS

We used 2011 survey data from a sample of 13,000 European citizens aged 16-74 years who had used the Internet in the previous 3 months. We proposed and tested an eHealth usage composite indicator through 2-stage structural equation modelling with latent variables and measurement errors. Logistic regression (odds ratios, ORs) to model the predictors of eHealth usage was calculated using health status and sociodemographic independent variables.

RESULTS

The dimensions with more explanatory power of eHealth usage were health Internet attitudes, information health Internet usage, empowerment of health Internet users, and the usefulness of health Internet usage. Some 52.39% (6811/13,000) of European Internet users' eHealth usage was more intensive (greater than the mean). Users with long-term health problems or illnesses (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.12-1.29) or receiving long-term treatment (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.20), having family members with long-term health problems or illnesses (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.34-1.55), or undertaking care activities for other people (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.40-1.77) had a high propensity toward intensive eHealth usage. Sociodemographic predictors showed that Internet users who were female (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.14-1.31), aged 25-54 years (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.21), living in larger households (3 members: OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.15-1.36; 5 members: OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.97-1.28; ≥6 members: OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.57), had more children <16 years of age (1 child: OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.18-1.14; 2 children: OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.94-1.17; 4 children: OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.88-2.08), and had more family members >65 years of age (1 member: OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.50; ≥4 members: OR 1.82, 95% CI 0.54-6.03) had a greater propensity toward intensive eHealth usage. Likewise, users residing in densely populated areas, such as cities and large towns (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.25), also had a greater propensity toward intensive eHealth usage. Educational levels presented an inverted U shape in relation to intensive eHealth usage, with greater propensities among those with a secondary education (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16). Finally, occupational categories and net monthly income data suggest a higher propensity among the employed or self-employed (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99-1.15) and among the minimum wage stratum, earning ≤€1000 per month (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.48-1.87).

CONCLUSIONS

We provide new evidence of inequalities that explain intensive eHealth usage. The results highlight the need to develop more specific eHealth practices to address different realities.

摘要

背景

需要更先进的方法和模型来评估患者和公民在电子健康所倡导的共享医疗模式中的参与情况。

目的

我们研究的目标是设计并评估一个电子健康使用情况的预测性多维模型。

方法

我们使用了2011年对13000名年龄在16 - 74岁之间、在过去3个月内使用过互联网的欧洲公民样本的调查数据。我们通过带有潜在变量和测量误差的两阶段结构方程模型提出并测试了一个电子健康使用综合指标。使用健康状况和社会人口统计学自变量,通过逻辑回归(优势比,OR)来对电子健康使用的预测因素进行建模。

结果

对电子健康使用具有更强解释力的维度包括健康互联网态度、信息健康互联网使用、健康互联网用户的赋权以及健康互联网使用的有用性。约52.39%(6811/13000)的欧洲互联网用户的电子健康使用更为频繁(高于平均水平)。患有长期健康问题或疾病的用户(OR 1.20,95%CI 1.12 - 1.29)或接受长期治疗的用户(OR 1.11,95%CI 1.03 - 1.20)、有家庭成员患有长期健康问题或疾病的用户(OR 1.44,95%CI 1.34 - 1.55)或为他人承担护理活动的用户(OR 1.58,95%CI 1.40 - 1.77)有较高的频繁使用电子健康的倾向。社会人口统计学预测因素表明,女性互联网用户(OR 1.23,95%CI 1.14 - 1.31)、年龄在25 - 54岁之间的用户(OR 1.12,95%CI 1.05 - 1.21)、生活在较大规模家庭中的用户(3人家庭:OR 1.25,95%CI 1.15 - 1.36;5人家庭:OR 1.13,95%CI 0.97 - 1.28;≥6人家庭:OR 1.31,95%CI 1.10 - 1.57)、有更多16岁以下子女的用户(1个孩子:OR 1.29,95%CI 1.18 - 1.14;2个孩子:OR 1.05,95%CI 0.94 - 1.17;4个孩子:OR 1.35,95%CI 0.88 - 2.08)以及有更多65岁以上家庭成员的用户(1个成员:OR 1.33,95%CI 1.18 - 1.50;≥4个成员:OR 1.82,95%CI 0.54 - 6.03)有更高的频繁使用电子健康的倾向。同样,居住在人口密集地区(如城市和大城镇)的用户(OR 1.17,95%CI 1.09 - 1.25)也有更高的频繁使用电子健康的倾向。教育水平与频繁使用电子健康呈倒U形关系,中等教育水平的用户倾向更高(OR 1.08,95%CI 1.01 - 1.16)。最后,职业类别和月净收入数据表明,受雇或自营职业者(OR 1.07,95%CI 0.99 - 1.15)以及月收入≤1000欧元的最低工资阶层(OR 1.66,95%CI 1.48 - 1.87)有更高的倾向。

结论

我们提供了新的证据来解释频繁使用电子健康的不平等现象。结果强调了开发更具针对性的电子健康实践以应对不同现实情况的必要性。

相似文献

1
Modelling and Predicting eHealth Usage in Europe: A Multidimensional Approach From an Online Survey of 13,000 European Union Internet Users.欧洲电子健康使用情况的建模与预测:基于对13000名欧盟互联网用户的在线调查的多维方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 22;18(7):e188. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5605.
2
Modeling and Predicting Outcomes of eHealth Usage by European Physicians: Multidimensional Approach from a Survey of 9196 General Practitioners.欧洲医生电子健康使用情况的建模与结果预测:来自9196名全科医生调查的多维方法
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 22;20(10):e279. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9253.
3
Internet use, eHealth literacy and attitudes toward computer/internet among people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a cross-sectional study in two distant European regions.精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的互联网使用、电子健康素养及对计算机/互联网的态度:在两个遥远欧洲地区开展的横断面研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Sep 20;17(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0531-4.
4
Electronic Health Use in the European Union and the Effect of Multimorbidity: Cross-Sectional Survey.欧盟电子健康的使用及多重疾病的影响:横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 3;20(5):e165. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7299.
5
Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012.电子健康使用的预测因素:基于2012年健康信息国家趋势调查对数字鸿沟的洞察
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 16;16(7):e172. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3117.
6
Online communication between doctors and patients in Europe: status and perspectives.欧洲医生与患者之间的在线交流:现状与展望。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Jun 15;12(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1281.
7
Online Health Information Seeking, eHealth Literacy, and Health Behaviors Among Chinese Internet Users: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.中文互联网用户的在线健康信息搜索、电子健康素养和健康行为:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 18;26:e54135. doi: 10.2196/54135.
8
eHealth usage patterns of European general practitioners: a five-year (2002-2007) comparative study.欧洲全科医生使用电子健康的模式:一项为期五年(2002-2007 年)的比较研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2010 Aug;79(8):539-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
9
Prevalence and Predictors of Health-Related Internet and Digital Device Use in a Sample of South Asian Adults in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Results From a 2014 Community-Based Survey.在加拿大阿尔伯塔省埃德蒙顿的一个南亚成年人样本中,与健康相关的互联网和数字设备使用的流行率及其预测因素:2014 年基于社区的调查结果。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 8;7(1):e20671. doi: 10.2196/20671.
10
eHealth patient-provider communication in the United States: interest, inequalities, and predictors.美国电子健康领域的医患沟通:兴趣、不平等现象及预测因素
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e18-e27. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw087.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring perspectives on digital smoking cessation just-in-time adaptive interventions: A focus group study with adult smokers and smoking cessation professionals.探索关于数字戒烟即时自适应干预措施的观点:一项针对成年吸烟者和戒烟专业人员的焦点小组研究。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 May 2;4(5):e0000705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000705. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Digital Health Literacy and Attitudes Toward eHealth Technologies Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease and Their Implications for Secondary Prevention: Survey Study.心血管疾病患者的数字健康素养及对电子健康技术的态度及其对二级预防的影响:调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 19;9:e63057. doi: 10.2196/63057.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012.电子健康使用的预测因素:基于2012年健康信息国家趋势调查对数字鸿沟的洞察
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 16;16(7):e172. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3117.
2
Cognitive factors of using health apps: systematic analysis of relationships among health consciousness, health information orientation, eHealth literacy, and health app use efficacy.使用健康应用程序的认知因素:健康意识、健康信息导向、电子健康素养与健康应用程序使用效果之间关系的系统分析
J Med Internet Res. 2014 May 9;16(5):e125. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3283.
3
Enhanced support for shared decision making reduced costs of care for patients with preference-sensitive conditions.
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mHealth adoption: Identification of the main barriers through an international comparative analysis.
新冠疫情对移动健康应用采纳的影响:通过国际比较分析确定主要障碍
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Mar;195:105779. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105779. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
4
Osteoporosis e-learning courses: A systematic review to develop a comprehensive virtual course for General Practitioners.骨质疏松症电子学习课程:为全科医生开发全面虚拟课程的系统评价。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2023 Dec 12;23(1):251-266. doi: 10.1007/s40200-023-01361-8. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Internet Access and Use by Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies: A Cross-Sectional Study.妇科恶性肿瘤患者的互联网接入与使用:一项横断面研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 26;16(9):1677. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091677.
6
Exploring facilitators and barriers of the sustainable acceptance of e-health system solutions in Ethiopia: A systematic review.探讨埃塞俄比亚可持续接受电子健康系统解决方案的促进因素和障碍:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 10;18(8):e0287991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287991. eCollection 2023.
7
Individual and contextual level enablers and barriers determining electronic community health information system implementation in northwest Ethiopia.个体和环境层面的促进因素和障碍因素,决定了电子社区卫生信息系统在埃塞俄比亚西北部的实施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):644. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09629-8.
8
Factors associated with use of wearable technology to support activity, well-being, or a healthy lifestyle in the adult population and among older adults.与在成年人群体和老年人中使用可穿戴技术以支持活动、幸福感或健康生活方式相关的因素。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 May 10;2(5):e0000245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000245. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Predictors of non-participation in a cardiac telerehabilitation programme: a prospective analysis.心脏远程康复计划未参与的预测因素:一项前瞻性分析。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021 Dec 10;3(1):81-89. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab105. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
World Heart Federation Roadmap for Digital Health in Cardiology.世界心脏联合会心脏病学数字健康路线图。
Glob Heart. 2022 Aug 26;17(1):61. doi: 10.5334/gh.1141. eCollection 2022.
增强对共享决策的支持可降低偏好敏感型疾病患者的医疗成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):285-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0941.
4
Correlates of health-related social media use among adults.成年人中与健康相关的社交媒体使用的相关因素。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jan 30;15(1):e21. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2297.
5
Implementing clinical practice guidelines about health promotion and disease prevention through shared decision making.通过共同决策实施关于健康促进和疾病预防的临床实践指南。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jun;28(6):838-44. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2321-0. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
6
Contribution of communication inequalities to disparities in human papillomavirus vaccine awareness and knowledge.沟通不平等对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗认知和知识差距的贡献。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Oct;102(10):1911-20. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300435. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
7
The prepared patient: information seeking of online support group members before their medical appointments.准备充分的患者:预约前在线支持小组成员的信息搜索行为。
J Health Commun. 2012;17(8):960-78. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.650828. Epub 2012 May 10.
8
Associations between Internet-based patient ratings and conventional surveys of patient experience in the English NHS: an observational study.基于互联网的患者评分与英国国民保健制度中常规患者体验调查之间的关联:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):600-5. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000906. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
9
A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.医生质量报告的变化态势:对患者在5年期间对其医生的在线评分的分析
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Feb 24;14(1):e38. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2003.
10
Assessing internet access and use in a medically underserved population: implications for providing enhanced health information services.评估医疗服务不足人群的互联网接入和使用情况:提供增强型健康信息服务的意义。
Health Info Libr J. 2012 Mar;29(1):61-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00971.x. Epub 2011 Dec 19.