University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Centre for Experimental Neurology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
J Sleep Res. 2023 Dec;32(6):e13927. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13927. Epub 2023 May 18.
Despite the success of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia and recent advances in pharmacotherapy, many patients with insomnia do not sufficiently respond to available treatments. This systematic review aims to present the state of science regarding the use of brain stimulation approaches in treating insomnia. To this end, we searched MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO from inception to 24 March 2023. We evaluated studies that compared conditions of active stimulation with a control condition or group. Outcome measures included standardized insomnia questionnaires and/or polysomnography in adults with a clinical diagnosis of insomnia. Our search identified 17 controlled trials that met inclusion criteria, and assessed a total of 967 participants using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial electric stimulation, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation or forehead cooling. No trials using other techniques such as deep brain stimulation, vestibular stimulation or auditory stimulation met the inclusion criteria. While several studies report improvements of subjective and objective sleep parameters for different repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial electric stimulation protocols, important methodological limitations and risk of bias limit their interpretability. A forehead cooling study found no significant group differences in the primary endpoints, but better sleep initiation in the active condition. Two transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation trials found no superiority of active stimulation for most outcome measures. Although modulating sleep through brain stimulation appears feasible, gaps in the prevailing models of sleep physiology and insomnia pathophysiology remain to be filled. Optimized stimulation protocols and proof of superiority over reliable sham conditions are indispensable before brain stimulation becomes a viable treatment option for insomnia.
尽管认知行为疗法治疗失眠症取得了成功,且药物治疗也取得了新进展,但许多失眠症患者对现有治疗方法的反应并不充分。本系统综述旨在介绍使用脑刺激方法治疗失眠症的研究现状。为此,我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 PsycINFO 数据库,检索时间截至 2023 年 3 月 24 日。我们评估了比较活跃刺激条件与对照条件或组的研究。结局指标包括成人失眠症临床诊断的标准化失眠问卷和/或多导睡眠图。我们的检索共确定了 17 项符合纳入标准的对照试验,共纳入了 967 名参与者,使用了重复经颅磁刺激、经颅电刺激、经皮耳迷走神经刺激或前额冷却。没有使用其他技术(如深部脑刺激、前庭刺激或听觉刺激)的试验符合纳入标准。尽管几项研究报告了不同的重复经颅磁刺激和经颅电刺激方案在主观和客观睡眠参数方面的改善,但重要的方法学局限性和偏倚风险限制了其可解释性。一项前额冷却研究发现,主要终点的两组间无显著差异,但活跃条件下的入睡起始情况更好。两项经皮耳迷走神经刺激试验发现,在大多数结局指标上,活跃刺激并无优势。虽然通过脑刺激调节睡眠似乎是可行的,但睡眠生理学和失眠症病理生理学的现有模型仍存在空白。在脑刺激成为失眠症可行的治疗选择之前,需要优化刺激方案并证明其优于可靠的假刺激条件。