Briassoulis G
Crit Care Med. 1986 Aug;14(8):735-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198608000-00014.
We compared automatic oscillometric measurements of systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures with simultaneous pressures measured from arterial catheters in six preterm infants. Oscillometric arterial pressure measurements were performed with the Omega automatic instrument, using the recommended cuff and the size-larger cuff. Despite highly significant overall correlation coefficients for oscillometric and catheter measurements, 29% to 42% of oscillometric measurements with both cuff sizes were outside the 5-mm Hg error limits, and 4.0% to 9.3% were more than 10 mm Hg different from catheter measurements. Changing the cuff size did not reduce inherent errors in the oscillometric method.
我们比较了6名早产儿采用自动示波法测量的收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压与同时通过动脉导管测量的压力。使用欧米茄自动仪器,采用推荐的袖带和大一号袖带进行示波法动脉压测量。尽管示波法测量值与导管测量值之间的总体相关系数非常显著,但两种袖带尺寸的示波法测量值中有29%至42%超出了5毫米汞柱的误差范围,4.0%至9.3%与导管测量值相差超过10毫米汞柱。改变袖带尺寸并未减少示波法的固有误差。