Chen Ingrid, Doum Dyna, Mannion Kylie, Hustedt John, Sovannaroth Siv, McIver David, Macdonald Michael, Lobo Neil F, Tatarsky Allison, Handley Margaret, Neukom Josselyn
University of California, San Francisco.
Health Forefront Organization.
Res Sq. 2023 May 4:rs.3.rs-2874672. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2874672/v1.
Southeast Asia is making tremendous progress towards their 2030 malaria elimination goal but needs new interventions to stop forest malaria. This study trials two new vector control tools, a volatile pyrethroid spatial repellent (VSPR) and insecticide-treated clothing (ITC), amongst forest-exposed populations in Mondulkiri Province Cambodia to inform their potential use for eliminating forest malaria.
21 forest-exposed individuals were given a questionnaire on their perceptions of malaria and preventive practices used, after which they trialed two products sequentially. Mixed methods were used to understand their experience, attitudes, and preferences regarding the products trialed. Quantitative data was summarized and qualitative insights were analyzed using thematic analysis, applying the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation Behavior Change (COM-B) model and Behavior Change Wheel Framework to identify intervention functions to support tailored product rollout amongst these populations.
Study participants reported a need for protection from mosquito bites in outdoor and forest-exposed settings and perceived both products trialed to be effective for this purpose. The VPSR product was preferred when travel was not required, whereas ITC was preferred for ease of use when going to the forest, especially in rainy conditions. COM-B analysis identified that key enablers for use of both products included their perceived efficacy and ease of use, which required no skill or preparation. For barriers to use, the odor of ITC was sometimes perceived as being toxic, as well as its inability to protect uncovered skin from mosquito bites, while the perceived usefulness of the VPSR product trialed was limited by its water sensitivity in rainy forest settings. Intervention components to encourage appropriate and sustained use of these products include education about how to use these products and what to expect, persuasion to use them from community leaders and targeted ads, and enablement to guarantee access.
The rollout of VPSRs and ITC amongst forest-exposed populations can be useful for eliminating malaria in Southeast Asia. Study findings can be applied to increase product uptake in Cambodia, while research efforts can aim to develop products that are rainproof, easy to use in forest settings, and have favorable odor profiles to target users.
东南亚在实现2030年消除疟疾目标方面正取得巨大进展,但需要新的干预措施来阻止森林型疟疾。本研究在柬埔寨蒙多基里省森林接触人群中试验了两种新的病媒控制工具,一种挥发性拟除虫菊酯空间驱避剂(VSPR)和经杀虫剂处理的衣物(ITC),以了解它们在消除森林型疟疾方面的潜在用途。
21名森林接触者填写了一份关于他们对疟疾的认知和所采用预防措施的问卷,之后他们依次试用了两种产品。采用混合方法来了解他们对所试用产品的体验、态度和偏好。对定量数据进行了总结,并使用主题分析对定性见解进行了分析,应用能力、机会、动机行为改变(COM-B)模型和行为改变轮框架来确定干预功能,以支持在这些人群中量身定制产品推广。
研究参与者表示需要在户外和森林接触环境中预防蚊虫叮咬,并认为所试用的两种产品在此方面均有效。当不需要出行时,VPSR产品更受青睐,而当前往森林时,尤其是在下雨条件下,ITC因其易用性更受青睐。COM-B分析表明,两种产品使用的关键促成因素包括其感知到的有效性和易用性,这不需要技能或准备。对于使用障碍,ITC的气味有时被认为有毒,而且它无法保护未覆盖的皮肤免受蚊虫叮咬,而所试用的VPSR产品的感知有用性在雨林环境中因其对水敏感而受到限制。鼓励适当和持续使用这些产品的干预措施包括关于如何使用这些产品以及预期效果的教育、社区领袖和针对性广告对使用这些产品的劝说,以及确保获取的赋能。
在森林接触人群中推广VPSR和ITC对东南亚消除疟疾可能有用。研究结果可用于提高柬埔寨的产品采用率,同时研究工作可致力于开发防雨、易于在森林环境中使用且对目标用户有良好气味特征的产品。