Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Trials. 2021 Nov 21;22(1):825. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05801-9.
While there is strong evidence that bite protection methods such as permethrin-treated clothing and topical insect repellents are protective against insect bites, there are few studies assessing the impact on malaria infection. This study will estimate the protective efficacy of treated uniforms and DEET insect repellent on the incidence of malaria infection among military personnel in an operational setting. Permethrin-treated uniforms used with DEET lotion will be compared to etofenprox-treated uniforms with DEET lotion. The effect of DEET lotion will be estimated by comparing permethrin-treated uniforms with DEET or placebo lotion.
A cluster randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial is planned to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions on preventing malaria infections in soldiers on active duty at Mgambo National Service Camp in Tanga, Tanzania. The arms are (1) permethrin-treated uniform with 30% DEET liposome formula; (2) permethrin-treated uniform with placebo lotion; (3) candidate insect repellent system, i.e. etofenprox-treated uniform with 30% DEET liposome formula; and (4) placebo, i.e. untreated uniforms with placebo lotion. The primary outcome is the incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by active case detection using surveys every 2 weeks for 12 months. Rapid diagnostic tests will be used for the diagnosis of participants with symptoms. The unit of randomisation will be combania: companies formed by recruits aged 18 to 25 years; combania do activities together and sleep in the same dormitory. Unequal randomisation will be used to optimise statistical power for the primary comparison between permethrin-treated uniforms with DEET and etofenprox-treated uniforms with DEET.
This trial will provide the estimate of the effects of permethrin with DEET compared to those of the new fabric treatment etofenprox with DEET and any additional effect of using DEET. The results will inform strategies to protect military personnel and civilians who have more outdoor or occupational malaria exposure than the general public.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02938975 .
虽然有强有力的证据表明,驱虫处理过的衣物和局部使用驱虫剂等防蚊措施可以预防蚊虫叮咬,但很少有研究评估其对疟疾感染的影响。本研究将评估在军事行动环境中,军用防虫处理制服和避蚊胺驱虫剂对军人疟疾感染发生率的保护效果。将对比使用避蚊胺驱虫剂的驱虫处理制服与使用埃卡瑞丁驱虫剂的驱虫处理制服,评估避蚊胺驱虫剂的效果,同时将对比使用避蚊胺驱虫剂的驱虫处理制服与使用避蚊胺或安慰剂乳液的效果。
计划开展一项整群随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,以评估干预措施在坦桑尼亚坦噶市 Mgambo 国家服务营现役士兵中预防疟疾感染的效果。试验组包括:(1)使用 30%避蚊胺微乳剂的驱虫处理制服;(2)使用安慰剂乳液的驱虫处理制服;(3)候选驱虫系统,即使用 30%避蚊胺微乳剂的埃卡瑞丁驱虫处理制服;(4)安慰剂,即使用安慰剂乳液的未处理制服。主要结局指标为通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测到的恶性疟原虫疟疾感染发生率,采用主动病例检测,每 2 周进行一次调查,持续 12 个月。对有症状的参与者将使用快速诊断检测进行诊断。随机分组单位为 combania:由 18 至 25 岁的新兵组成的连队;combania 一起活动,睡在同一个宿舍。采用不等分随机化以优化主要比较结果的统计效力,即使用避蚊胺的驱虫处理制服与使用埃卡瑞丁和避蚊胺的新织物处理的效果比较。
本试验将评估使用避蚊胺的驱虫处理制服与使用埃卡瑞丁和避蚊胺的新织物处理的效果,并评估使用避蚊胺的任何额外效果。试验结果将为保护户外或职业性疟疾暴露多于普通人群的军人和平民提供策略信息。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02938975。