Suppr超能文献

当前的生物标志物数据能告诉我们加热烟草产品导致肺癌的风险有多大?

What Can Current Biomarker Data Tell Us About the Risks of Lung Cancer Posed by Heated Tobacco Products?

机构信息

Tobacco Control Research Group, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Feb 22;26(3):270-280. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad081.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are marketed as less harmful alternatives to cigarettes, but the lung cancer risk of HTPs is unknown. In the absence of epidemiological data, assessing the risks of HTPs relies on biomarker data from clinical trials. This study examined existing biomarker data to determine what it tells us about the lung cancer risk posed by HTPs.

AIMS AND METHODS

We identified all biomarkers of exposure and potential harm measured in HTP trials and evaluated their appropriateness based on ideal characteristics for measuring lung cancer risk and tobacco use. The effects of HTPs on the most appropriate biomarkers within cigarette smokers switched to HTPs and compared to continued cigarette smoking or cessation were synthesized.

RESULTS

Sixteen out of eighty-two biomarkers (7 exposure and 9 potential harm) measured in HTP trials have been associated with tobacco use and lung cancer, dose-dependently correlated with smoking, modifiable upon cessation, measured within an appropriate timeframe, and had results published. Three of the exposure biomarkers significantly improved in smokers who switched to HTPs and were not significantly different from cessation. The remaining 13 biomarkers did not improve-in some instances worsening upon switching to HTPs-or were inconsistently affected across studies. There were no appropriate data to estimate the lung cancer risk of HTPs in non-smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

The appropriateness of existing biomarker data in assessing lung cancer risk of HTPs, both relative to cigarettes and their absolute risk, is limited. Furthermore, findings on the most appropriate biomarkers were conflicting across studies and largely showed no improvement following a switch to HTPs.

IMPLICATIONS

Biomarker data are fundamental to assessing the reduced risk potential of HTPs. Our evaluation suggests much of the existing biomarker data on HTPs is inappropriate for determining the risk of lung cancer posed by HTPs. In particular, there is a paucity of data on the absolute lung cancer risk of HTPs, which could be obtained from comparisons to smokers who quit and never smokers exposed to or using HTPs. There is an urgent need for further exploration of the lung cancer risks posed by HTPs, via clinical trials and, in the long-term, confirmation of these risks via epidemiological studies. However, careful consideration should be given to biomarker selection and study design to ensure both are appropriate and will provide valuable data.

摘要

简介

加热烟草产品(HTP)被宣传为比香烟危害更小的替代品,但 HTP 引发肺癌的风险尚不清楚。在缺乏流行病学数据的情况下,评估 HTP 的风险依赖于临床试验中的生物标志物数据。本研究通过检查现有的生物标志物数据,确定了它们对 HTP 引发肺癌风险的提示。

目的和方法

我们确定了 HTP 试验中测量的所有暴露和潜在危害的生物标志物,并根据衡量肺癌风险和吸烟的理想特征对其进行了适当性评估。综合分析了在已戒烟者和继续吸烟者中,HTP 对最适合的生物标志物的影响,并与继续吸烟或戒烟进行了比较。

结果

在 HTP 试验中测量的 82 种生物标志物(7 种暴露标志物和 9 种潜在危害标志物)中有 16 种与吸烟和肺癌有关,与吸烟量呈剂量依赖性相关,在停止吸烟后可改变,在适当的时间范围内进行测量,且研究结果已发表。在转为使用 HTP 的吸烟者中,有 3 种暴露标志物显著改善,且与戒烟者无显著差异。其余 13 种生物标志物没有改善——在某些情况下,改用 HTP 后反而恶化——或者在不同研究中受到不同影响。没有适当的数据来估计非吸烟者使用 HTP 引发肺癌的风险。

结论

评估 HTP 引发肺癌风险的现有生物标志物数据的适宜性,无论是相对于香烟还是绝对风险,都是有限的。此外,关于最适合的生物标志物的研究结果在不同研究中相互矛盾,且大多表明,转为使用 HTP 后并没有改善。

意义

生物标志物数据是评估 HTP 降低风险潜力的基础。我们的评估表明,HTP 现有的大部分生物标志物数据都不适合用于确定 HTP 引发肺癌的风险。特别是,缺乏关于 HTP 绝对肺癌风险的数据,这些数据可以通过与戒烟者和从未接触或使用 HTP 的吸烟者进行比较来获得。迫切需要通过临床试验进一步探索 HTP 引发的肺癌风险,并在长期内通过流行病学研究确认这些风险。但是,应该仔细考虑生物标志物的选择和研究设计,以确保两者都合适并能提供有价值的数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1680/10882439/379fff495f18/ntad081_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验