Spivakovsky Silvia, Suh Yoon Weon, Janal Malvin N
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Radiology & Medicine, NYU College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA.
New York University School of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA.
PEC Innov. 2022 Nov 9;1:100100. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100100. eCollection 2022 Dec.
The authors aim to evaluate a scale assessing oral health knowledge, the KROHL (Knowledge Related to Oral Health Literacy) including the inter-rater reliability for scoring open-ended questions, internal consistency of the hypothesized scales, the discriminant validity of the resulting scale and its relationship to existing measures of oral health literacy.
The questionnaire was administered via face-to-face interviews to 144 volunteers recruited in the waiting areas of clinics throughout the NYU College of Dentistry.The KROHL questionnaire evaluates oral health knowledge by asking open-ended questions about the appearance, cause, treatment and prevention of caries, gum disease, oral cancer, tooth loss and malocclusion. Those 20 questions were scored to produce scale scores. Demographic information, a self-reported measure of HL and the CMOHK (Comprehensive Measure of Oral Health Knowledge) were also collected.Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients and principal components analysis, by computing Cronbach's alpha and Cohen's kappa, and by comparing group means with ANOVA.
Kappa indicated good to excellent agreement among raters for the full and the individual subscales of the KROHL. Cronbach's alpha indicated good consistency of the full scale score, but not the individual scales. The mean (SD) KROHL score was lower in the patient group than in the dental students (13.3 (5.9) vs. 26.1 (4.7), < .001), and varied directly with education level within the patients. KROHL scores were unrelated to existing measures of health literacy.
The KROHL scale is an innovative, reliable and valid tool to assess overall oral health knowledge and provide information to customize educational interventions. Further research is needed to determine the validity and reliability of the scale in multiple settings.
The innovation of the KROHL tool of assessment of oral health knowledge lies in its ability to scale depth of knowledge within the domains of identification, causes, prevention, and treatment for the most common oral conditions.
作者旨在评估一种评估口腔健康知识的量表,即KROHL(与口腔健康素养相关的知识量表),包括对开放式问题评分的评分者间信度、假设量表的内部一致性、所得量表的区分效度及其与现有口腔健康素养测量方法的关系。
通过面对面访谈,对纽约大学牙科学院各诊所候诊区招募的144名志愿者进行问卷调查。KROHL问卷通过询问有关龋齿、牙龈疾病、口腔癌、牙齿脱落和错牙合畸形的外观、病因、治疗和预防的开放式问题来评估口腔健康知识。对这20个问题进行评分以得出量表分数。还收集了人口统计学信息、自我报告的健康素养测量值和CMOHK(口腔健康知识综合测量量表)。使用Pearson相关系数和主成分分析、计算Cronbach's α 和Cohen's κ,并通过ANOVA比较组均值来分析数据。
Kappa表明评分者之间对KROHL的完整量表和各个子量表的一致性良好至优秀。Cronbach's α 表明完整量表分数的一致性良好,但各个子量表并非如此。患者组的KROHL平均得分低于牙科学生(13.3(5.9)对26.1(4.7),P <.001),并且在患者中随教育水平直接变化。KROHL分数与现有的健康素养测量方法无关。
KROHL量表是一种创新、可靠且有效的工具,可用于评估整体口腔健康知识,并为定制教育干预措施提供信息。需要进一步研究以确定该量表在多种环境中的效度和信度。
KROHL口腔健康知识评估工具的创新之处在于它能够衡量在最常见口腔疾病的识别、病因、预防和治疗领域内的知识深度。