Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6525 XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands
The International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, 6525 XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Neurosci. 2023 Jun 28;43(26):4867-4883. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0964-22.2023. Epub 2023 May 23.
To understand language, we need to recognize words and combine them into phrases and sentences. During this process, responses to the words themselves are changed. In a step toward understanding how the brain builds sentence structure, the present study concerns the neural readout of this adaptation. We ask whether low-frequency neural readouts associated with words change as a function of being in a sentence. To this end, we analyzed an MEG dataset by Schoffelen et al. (2019) of 102 human participants (51 women) listening to sentences and word lists, the latter lacking any syntactic structure and combinatorial meaning. Using temporal response functions and a cumulative model-fitting approach, we disentangled delta- and theta-band responses to lexical information (word frequency), from responses to sensory and distributional variables. The results suggest that delta-band responses to words are affected by sentence context in time and space, over and above entropy and surprisal. In both conditions, the word frequency response spanned left temporal and posterior frontal areas; however, the response appeared later in word lists than in sentences. In addition, sentence context determined whether inferior frontal areas were responsive to lexical information. In the theta band, the amplitude was larger in the word list condition ∼100 milliseconds in right frontal areas. We conclude that low-frequency responses to words are changed by sentential context. The results of this study show how the neural representation of words is affected by structural context and as such provide insight into how the brain instantiates compositionality in language. Human language is unprecedented in its combinatorial capacity: we are capable of producing and understanding sentences we have never heard before. Although the mechanisms underlying this capacity have been described in formal linguistics and cognitive science, how they are implemented in the brain remains to a large extent unknown. A large body of earlier work from the cognitive neuroscientific literature implies a role for delta-band neural activity in the representation of linguistic structure and meaning. In this work, we combine these insights and techniques with findings from psycholinguistics to show that meaning is more than the sum of its parts; the delta-band MEG signal differentially reflects lexical information inside and outside sentence structures.
为了理解语言,我们需要识别单词并将它们组合成短语和句子。在这个过程中,对单词本身的反应会发生变化。在朝着理解大脑如何构建句子结构的方向迈出的一步中,本研究关注了这种适应的神经读出。我们想知道与单词相关的低频神经读出是否会随着句子的变化而变化。为此,我们分析了 Schoffelen 等人(2019 年)的 102 名人类参与者(51 名女性)的 MEG 数据集,这些参与者听句子和单词列表,后者没有任何句法结构和组合意义。使用时间响应函数和累积模型拟合方法,我们将词汇信息(词频)的 delta 和 theta 频带响应与感官和分布变量的响应区分开来。结果表明,单词的 delta 频带响应在时间和空间上受到句子上下文的影响,超过了熵和意外度的影响。在两种情况下,单词频率的响应都跨越了左颞叶和额前区;然而,在单词列表中的响应比在句子中出现得晚。此外,句子上下文决定了额下回是否对词汇信息有反应。在 theta 频段,右侧额前区的振幅在单词列表条件下约为 100 毫秒时更大。我们得出的结论是,单词的低频响应会受到句子上下文的影响。本研究的结果表明,单词的神经表示是如何受到结构上下文的影响的,因此为大脑在语言中实现组合性提供了深入的见解。人类语言在组合能力上是前所未有的:我们能够生成和理解以前从未听过的句子。尽管形式语言学和认知科学已经描述了这种能力的机制,但它们在大脑中的实现方式在很大程度上仍然未知。认知神经科学文献中的大量早期工作表明,delta 频带神经活动在语言结构和意义的表示中起作用。在这项工作中,我们将这些见解和技术与心理语言学的发现相结合,表明意义不仅仅是其组成部分的总和;delta 频带 MEG 信号在句子结构内外以不同的方式反映词汇信息。