Von Hügel Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, College of Medicine, Vincent Drive, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B152TT, UK.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2023 May 24;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13010-023-00133-9.
Biomedicine, i.e. the application of basic sciences to medicine, has become the cornerstone for the study of etiopathogenesis and treatment of diseases. Biomedicine has enormously contributed to the progress of medicine and healthcare and has become the preferred approach to medical problems in the West. The developments in statistical inference and machine learning techniques have provided the foundation for personalised medicine where clinical management can be fully informed by biomedicine. The deployment of precision medicine may impact the autonomy and self-normativity of the patients. Understanding the relationship between biomedicine and medical practice can help navigate the benefits and challenges offered by precision medicine.
Conventional content analysis was applied to "Le Normal and le Pathologique" (Canguilhem G. The Normal and the Pathological. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1991) and further investigated with respect to its relationship with techne and precision medicine using PubMed and Google Scholar and the Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy to search for the following keywords singularly or in combination: "Canguilhem", "techne", "episteme", "precision medicine", "machine learning AND medicine".
The Hippocratic concept of techne accounts for many characteristics of medical knowledge and practice. The advances of biomedicine, experimental medicine and, more recently, machine learning offer, in contrast, the model of a medicine based purely on episteme. I argue that Canguilhem medical epistemology establishes a framework where episteme and data-driven medicine is compatible with the promotion of patient's autonomy and self-normativity.
Canguilhem's medical epistemology orders the relationship of applied medicine with experimental sciences, ethics and social sciences. It provides guidance to define the scope of medicine and the boundaries of medicalization of healthy life. Finally, it sets an agenda for a safe implementation of machine learning in medicine.
即基础科学在医学中的应用,生物医学已经成为研究疾病病因和治疗方法的基石。生物医学为医学和医疗保健的进步做出了巨大贡献,并且已经成为西方解决医学问题的首选方法。统计推断和机器学习技术的发展为个性化医学提供了基础,在这种医学中,临床管理可以充分利用生物医学信息。精准医学的应用可能会影响患者的自主权和自我规范性。了解生物医学与医学实践之间的关系有助于驾驭精准医学带来的益处和挑战。
常规内容分析应用于《正常与病态》(Canguilhem G. The Normal and the Pathological. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1991),并使用 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 以及斯坦福哲学百科全书进一步研究了其与技术和精准医学的关系,单独或组合使用以下关键词进行搜索:“Canguilhem”、“techne”、“episteme”、“precision medicine”、“machine learning AND medicine”。
希波克拉底的技术概念解释了许多医学知识和实践的特征。相比之下,生物医学、实验医学以及最近的机器学习的进步提供了一种纯粹基于认识论的医学模式。我认为,康吉莱姆的医学认识论确立了一个框架,在这个框架中,认识论和数据驱动的医学与促进患者的自主权和自我规范性是兼容的。
康吉莱姆的医学认识论规定了应用医学与实验科学、伦理学和社会科学的关系。它为定义医学的范围和健康生活的医学化界限提供了指导。最后,它为机器学习在医学中的安全实施设定了议程。