Suppr超能文献

种植体部位骨类型的新分类:一项口腔 CT 研究。

New classification for bone type at dental implant sites: a dental computed tomography study.

机构信息

School of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, 404, Taiwan.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, China Medical University, Taichung, 404, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 25;23(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03039-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study proposed a new classification method of bone quantity and quality at the dental implant site using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image analysis, classifying cortical and cancellous bones separately and using CBCT for quantitative analysis.

METHODS

Preoperative CBCT images were obtained from 128 implant patients (315 sites). First, measure the crestal cortical bone thickness (in mm) and the cancellous bone density [in grayscale values (GV) and bone mineral density (g/cm)] at the implant sites. The new classification for bone quality at the implant site proposed in this study is a "nine-square division" bone classification system, where the cortical bone thickness is classified into A: > 1.1 mm, B:0.7-1.1 mm, and C: < 0.7 mm, and the cancellous bone density is classified into 1: > 600 GV (= 420 g/cm), 2:300-600 GV (= 160 g/cm-420 g/cm), and 3: < 300 GV (= 160 g/cm).

RESULTS

The results of the nine bone type proportions based on the new jawbone classification were as follows: A1 (8.57%,27/315), A2 (13.02%), A3 (4.13%), B1 (17.78%), B2 (20.63%), B3 (8.57%) C1 (4.44%), C2 (14.29%), and C3 (8.57%).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed classification can complement the parts overlooked in previous bone classification methods (bone types A3 and C1).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The retrospective registration of this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University Hospital, No. CMUH 108-REC2-181.

摘要

目的

本研究提出了一种基于锥形束 CT(CBCT)图像分析的新的种植体部位骨量和骨质量分类方法,分别对皮质骨和松质骨进行分类,并使用 CBCT 进行定量分析。

方法

从 128 名种植患者(315 个部位)的术前 CBCT 图像中获取数据。首先,测量种植部位的牙槽嵴皮质骨厚度(以毫米为单位)和松质骨密度[灰度值(GV)和骨矿物质密度(g/cm)]。本研究提出的种植部位骨质量的新分类是一种“九宫格”骨分类系统,其中皮质骨厚度分为 A:>1.1mm、B:0.7-1.1mm 和 C:<0.7mm,松质骨密度分为 1:>600GV(=420g/cm)、2:300-600GV(=160g/cm-420g/cm)和 3:<300GV(=160g/cm)。

结果

基于新的颌骨分类的 9 种骨型比例结果如下:A1(8.57%,27/315)、A2(13.02%)、A3(4.13%)、B1(17.78%)、B2(20.63%)、B3(8.57%)、C1(4.44%)、C2(14.29%)和 C3(8.57%)。

结论

所提出的分类可以补充以往骨分类方法中忽略的部分(骨型 A3 和 C1)。

试验注册

本研究的回顾性注册获得了中国医科大学附属医院机构审查委员会的批准,注册号为 CMUH 108-REC2-181。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4975/10214681/d95b9cc9f3ce/12903_2023_3039_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
New classification for bone type at dental implant sites: a dental computed tomography study.
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 25;23(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03039-2.
2
Relationship between Cortical Bone Thickness and Cancellous Bone Density at Dental Implant Sites in the Jawbone.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 17;10(9):710. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090710.
3
Variations in crestal cortical bone thickness at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Jun;19(3):440-446. doi: 10.1111/cid.12468. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
5
Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Sep 1;18(9):785-789. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2127.
6
The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24(8):871-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02390.x. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
7
Can Male Patient's Age Affect the Cortical Bone Thickness of Jawbone for Dental Implant Placement? A Cohort Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 18;18(8):4284. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084284.

本文引用的文献

2
Can Male Patient's Age Affect the Cortical Bone Thickness of Jawbone for Dental Implant Placement? A Cohort Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 18;18(8):4284. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084284.
3
Relationship between Cortical Bone Thickness and Cancellous Bone Density at Dental Implant Sites in the Jawbone.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 17;10(9):710. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090710.
5
Age-dependent role of SIRT6 in jawbone via regulating senescence and autophagy of bone marrow stromal cells.
J Mol Histol. 2020 Feb;51(1):67-76. doi: 10.1007/s10735-020-09857-w. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
6
Revised, Computed Tomography-Based Lekholm and Zarb Jawbone Quality Classification.
Int J Prosthodont. 2018 Jul/Aug;31(4):342-345. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5714.
8
Factors Affecting the Survival Rate of Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Nov-Dec;7(6):351-355. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_380_17. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
9
Long-term Retrospective Study based on Implant Success Rate in Patients with Risk Factor: 15-year Follow-up.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):90-93. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2217.
10
Recent advances in dental implants.
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov 5;39(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40902-017-0132-2. eCollection 2017 Dec.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验