Suppr超能文献

精英女子冰球运动员在等距腿举和反向纵跳过程中获得的力量和功率相关变量的组间可靠性。

Between-Session Reliability of Strength- and Power-Related Variables Obtained during Isometric Leg Press and Countermovement Jump in Elite Female Ice Hockey Players.

作者信息

Petré Henrik, Psilander Niklas, Rosdahl Hans

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Nutrition, and Biomechanics, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, 11486 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Sports (Basel). 2023 Apr 29;11(5):96. doi: 10.3390/sports11050096.

Abstract

Isometric leg press (ILP) and countermovement jump (CMJ) are commonly used to obtain strength- and power-related variables with important implications for health maintenance and sports performance. To enable the identification of true changes in performance with these measurements, the reliability must be known. This study evaluates the between-session reliability of strength- and power-related measures obtained from ILP and CMJ. Thirteen female elite ice hockey players (21.5 ± 5.1 years; 66.3 ± 8.0 kg) performed three maximal ILPs and CMJs on two different occasions. Variables from the ILP (peak force and peak rate of force development) and CMJ (peak power, peak force, peak velocity, and peak jump height) were obtained. The results were reported using the best trial, an average of the two best trials, or an average of three trials. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were high (ICC > 0.97; CV < 5.2%) for all outcomes. The CV for the CMJ (1.5-3.2%) was lower than that for the ILP (3.4-5.2%). There were no differences between reporting the best trial, an average of the two best trials, or an average of the three trials for the outcomes. ILP and CMJ are highly reliable when examining strength- and power-related variables in elite female ice hockey players.

摘要

等长腿部推举(ILP)和反向纵跳(CMJ)通常用于获取与力量和功率相关的变量,这些变量对健康维持和运动表现具有重要意义。为了通过这些测量确定表现的真实变化,必须了解其可靠性。本研究评估了从ILP和CMJ获得的与力量和功率相关测量的组间可靠性。13名女性精英冰球运动员(21.5±5.1岁;66.3±8.0千克)在两个不同的场合进行了三次最大ILP和CMJ测试。获取了ILP(峰值力和峰值力发展速率)和CMJ(峰值功率、峰值力、峰值速度和峰值跳跃高度)的变量。结果报告使用最佳测试、两次最佳测试的平均值或三次测试的平均值。所有结果的组内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(CV)都很高(ICC>0.97;CV<5.2%)。CMJ的CV(1.5-3.2%)低于ILP的CV(3.4-5.2%)。对于结果,报告最佳测试、两次最佳测试的平均值或三次测试的平均值之间没有差异。在检查精英女性冰球运动员与力量和功率相关的变量时,ILP和CMJ具有高度可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c8/10222148/60f7ca3c7611/sports-11-00096-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验