• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对支持通信的交通交互进行建模。

Modelling communication-enabled traffic interactions.

作者信息

Siebinga O, Zgonnikov A, Abbink D A

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Robotics, Delft University of Technology Mekelweg 2, Delft, The Netherlands.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2023 May 24;10(5):230537. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230537. eCollection 2023 May.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.230537
PMID:37234489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10206467/
Abstract

A major challenge for autonomous vehicles is handling interactions with human-driven vehicles-for example, in highway merging. A better understanding and computational modelling of human interactive behaviour could help address this challenge. However, existing modelling approaches predominantly neglect communication between drivers and assume that one modelled driver in the interaction responds to the other, but does not actively influence their behaviour. Here, we argue that addressing these two limitations is crucial for the accurate modelling of interactions. We propose a new computational framework addressing these limitations. Similar to game-theoretic approaches, we model a joint interactive system rather than an isolated driver who only responds to their environment. Contrary to game theory, our framework explicitly incorporates communication between two drivers and bounded rationality in each driver's behaviours. We demonstrate our model's potential in a simplified merging scenario of two vehicles, illustrating that it generates plausible interactive behaviour (e.g. aggressive and conservative merging). Furthermore, human-like gap-keeping behaviour emerged in a car-following scenario directly from risk perception without the explicit implementation of time or distance gaps in the model's decision-making. These results suggest that our framework is a promising approach to interaction modelling that can support the development of interaction-aware autonomous vehicles.

摘要

自动驾驶车辆面临的一个主要挑战是处理与人类驾驶车辆的交互,例如在高速公路上合并车道时。对人类交互行为有更好的理解和计算建模有助于应对这一挑战。然而,现有的建模方法主要忽略了驾驶员之间的通信,并假设交互中一个建模的驾驶员对另一个驾驶员做出反应,但不会积极影响他们的行为。在这里,我们认为解决这两个限制对于准确建模交互至关重要。我们提出了一个解决这些限制的新计算框架。与博弈论方法类似,我们对一个联合交互系统进行建模,而不是对一个只对其环境做出反应的孤立驾驶员进行建模。与博弈论相反,我们的框架明确纳入了两个驾驶员之间的通信以及每个驾驶员行为中的有限理性。我们在两辆车的简化合并场景中展示了我们模型的潜力,说明它产生了合理的交互行为(例如激进和保守的合并)。此外,在跟车场景中,类似人类的保持车距行为直接从风险感知中出现,而在模型决策中没有明确实施时间或距离间隔。这些结果表明,我们的框架是一种有前途的交互建模方法,可以支持具有交互感知能力的自动驾驶车辆的开发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/972d064c390d/rsos230537f09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/f63f6bd3a2be/rsos230537f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/b9ee61f7f7b1/rsos230537f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/fd2360e33549/rsos230537f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/dc466a9826a3/rsos230537f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/5f195d9f2cef/rsos230537f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/d68159a3c956/rsos230537f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/429a93117e39/rsos230537f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/b5b7eac4acf3/rsos230537f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/972d064c390d/rsos230537f09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/f63f6bd3a2be/rsos230537f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/b9ee61f7f7b1/rsos230537f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/fd2360e33549/rsos230537f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/dc466a9826a3/rsos230537f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/5f195d9f2cef/rsos230537f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/d68159a3c956/rsos230537f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/429a93117e39/rsos230537f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/b5b7eac4acf3/rsos230537f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d5/10206467/972d064c390d/rsos230537f09.jpg

相似文献

1
Modelling communication-enabled traffic interactions.对支持通信的交通交互进行建模。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 May 24;10(5):230537. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230537. eCollection 2023 May.
2
A model of dyadic merging interactions explains human drivers' behavior from control inputs to decisions.二元合并交互模型解释了人类驾驶员从控制输入到决策的行为。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 24;3(10):pgae420. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae420. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Safety assessment for autonomous vehicles: A reference driver model for highway merging scenarios.自动驾驶汽车的安全评估:高速公路汇流场景的参考驾驶员模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Oct;206:107710. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107710. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
4
Multi-vehicle interaction safety of connected automated vehicles in merging area: A real-time risk assessment approach.车车交互的自动驾驶车辆在合流区的安全:实时风险评估方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Mar;166:106546. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106546. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
5
A Bayesian Driver Agent Model for Autonomous Vehicles System Based on Knowledge-Aware and Real-Time Data.基于知识感知和实时数据的自主车辆系统的贝叶斯驾驶员代理模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 6;21(2):331. doi: 10.3390/s21020331.
6
Human-Like Lane Change Decision Model for Autonomous Vehicles that Considers the Risk Perception of Drivers in Mixed Traffic.面向混合交通中驾驶员风险感知的自主车辆类人变道决策模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Apr 16;20(8):2259. doi: 10.3390/s20082259.
7
Driver-Automated Vehicle Interaction in Mixed Traffic: Types of Interaction and Drivers' Driving Styles.混合交通中的驾驶员-自动驾驶车辆交互:交互类型和驾驶员的驾驶风格。
Hum Factors. 2024 Feb;66(2):544-561. doi: 10.1177/00187208221088358. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
8
Longitudinal control behaviour: Analysis and modelling based on experimental surveys in Italy and the UK.纵向控制行为:基于意大利和英国的实验调查的分析和建模。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Apr;89:74-87. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
9
Assessing the Impacts of Autonomous Vehicles on Road Congestion Using Microsimulation.利用微观仿真评估自动驾驶汽车对道路拥堵的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 10;22(12):4407. doi: 10.3390/s22124407.
10
Safety performance evaluation of freeway merging areas under autonomous vehicles environment using a co-simulation platform.自动驾驶环境下高速公路合流区的安全性能评价——基于协同仿真平台。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 May;199:107530. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107530. Epub 2024 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
A model of dyadic merging interactions explains human drivers' behavior from control inputs to decisions.二元合并交互模型解释了人类驾驶员从控制输入到决策的行为。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 24;3(10):pgae420. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae420. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Explaining human interactions on the road by large-scale integration of computational psychological theory.通过大规模整合计算心理学理论来解释道路上的人际互动。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Jun 20;2(6):pgad163. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad163. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Should I Stay or Should I Go? Cognitive Modeling of Left-Turn Gap Acceptance Decisions in Human Drivers.我该留下还是离开?人类驾驶员左转间隙接受决策的认知建模。
Hum Factors. 2024 May;66(5):1399-1413. doi: 10.1177/00187208221144561. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
3
Modeling drivers' reaction when being tailgated: A Random Forests Method.
模拟被追尾时驾驶员的反应:随机森林方法。
J Safety Res. 2021 Sep;78:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 25.
4
Human-like driving behaviour emerges from a risk-based driver model.类人驾驶行为源于基于风险的驾驶员模型。
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 29;11(1):4850. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18353-4.
5
Which parts of the road guide obstacle avoidance? Quantifying the driver's risk field.道路的哪些部分引导驾驶员避开障碍物?量化驾驶员的风险场。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Nov;89:103196. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103196. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
6
Social behavior for autonomous vehicles.自主车辆的社会行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 10;116(50):24972-24978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820676116. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
7
Human sensorimotor communication: a theory of signaling in online social interactions.人类感觉运动沟通:在线社交互动中的信号理论。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e79876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079876. eCollection 2013.
8
Prospect balancing theory: Bounded rationality of drivers' speed choice.前景平衡理论:驾驶员速度选择的有限理性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Feb;63:49-64. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.028. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
9
Kinematics fingerprints of leader and follower role-taking during cooperative joint actions.领导者和追随者在合作联合动作中角色转换的运动学特征。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 May;226(4):473-86. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3459-7. Epub 2013 Mar 17.
10
Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity.增强智能驾驶员模型以评估驾驶策略对交通容量的影响。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2010 Oct 13;368(1928):4585-605. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0084.