• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二元合并交互模型解释了人类驾驶员从控制输入到决策的行为。

A model of dyadic merging interactions explains human drivers' behavior from control inputs to decisions.

作者信息

Siebinga Olger, Zgonnikov Arkady, Abbink David A

机构信息

Mechanical Engineering - Cognitive Robotics, TU Delft, Delft, CD 2628, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 24;3(10):pgae420. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae420. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae420
PMID:39359397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11443968/
Abstract

Safe and socially acceptable interactions with human-driven vehicles are a major challenge in automated driving. A good understanding of the underlying principles of such traffic interactions could help address this challenge. Particularly, accurate driver models could be used to inform automated vehicles in interactions. These interactions entail complex dynamic joint behaviors composed of individual driver contributions in terms of high-level decisions, safety margins, and low-level control inputs. Existing driver models typically focus on one of these aspects, limiting our understanding of the underlying principles of traffic interactions. Here, we present a Communication-Enabled Interaction model based on risk perception, that does not assume humans are rational and explicitly accounts for communication between drivers. Our model can explain and reproduce observed human interactions in a simplified merging scenario on all three levels. Thereby improving our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of human traffic interactions and posing a step towards interaction-aware automated driving.

摘要

与人类驾驶车辆进行安全且符合社会规范的交互是自动驾驶中的一项重大挑战。深入理解此类交通交互的潜在原理有助于应对这一挑战。特别是,准确的驾驶员模型可用于在交互过程中为自动驾驶车辆提供信息。这些交互涉及复杂的动态联合行为,这些行为由驾驶员在高级决策、安全裕度和低级控制输入方面的个体贡献组成。现有的驾驶员模型通常只关注这些方面中的一个,限制了我们对交通交互潜在原理的理解。在此,我们提出一种基于风险感知的支持通信的交互模型,该模型不假定人类是理性的,并且明确考虑了驾驶员之间的通信。我们的模型可以在简化的合并场景中在所有三个层面上解释和重现观察到的人类交互。从而增进我们对人类交通交互潜在机制的理解,并朝着具备交互感知能力的自动驾驶迈出一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1c/11443968/a749b27000b1/pgae420f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1c/11443968/67d3368ebf0c/pgae420f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1c/11443968/e23d1cc64b9f/pgae420f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1c/11443968/72445d721129/pgae420f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1c/11443968/b63d755cb8da/pgae420f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1c/11443968/a749b27000b1/pgae420f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1c/11443968/67d3368ebf0c/pgae420f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1c/11443968/e23d1cc64b9f/pgae420f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1c/11443968/72445d721129/pgae420f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1c/11443968/b63d755cb8da/pgae420f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1c/11443968/a749b27000b1/pgae420f5.jpg

相似文献

1
A model of dyadic merging interactions explains human drivers' behavior from control inputs to decisions.二元合并交互模型解释了人类驾驶员从控制输入到决策的行为。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 24;3(10):pgae420. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae420. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Modelling communication-enabled traffic interactions.对支持通信的交通交互进行建模。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 May 24;10(5):230537. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230537. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Driver-Automated Vehicle Interaction in Mixed Traffic: Types of Interaction and Drivers' Driving Styles.混合交通中的驾驶员-自动驾驶车辆交互:交互类型和驾驶员的驾驶风格。
Hum Factors. 2024 Feb;66(2):544-561. doi: 10.1177/00187208221088358. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
4
Design and evaluation of cooperative human-machine interface for changing lanes in conditional driving automation.条件自动驾驶中换道用协作式人机界面的设计与评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Sep;174:106719. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106719. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
5
Should I Stay or Should I Go? Cognitive Modeling of Left-Turn Gap Acceptance Decisions in Human Drivers.我该留下还是离开?人类驾驶员左转间隙接受决策的认知建模。
Hum Factors. 2024 May;66(5):1399-1413. doi: 10.1177/00187208221144561. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
6
Safety assessment for autonomous vehicles: A reference driver model for highway merging scenarios.自动驾驶汽车的安全评估:高速公路汇流场景的参考驾驶员模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Oct;206:107710. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107710. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
7
Driver behaviors assisted by different human machine interfaces to avoid rear-end collisions during level 2 automated driving.不同人机界面辅助下的驾驶员行为,以避免 2 级自动驾驶时的追尾碰撞。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(6):475-481. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2222326. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
8
Research on drivers' hazard perception in plateau environment based on visual characteristics.基于视觉特征的高原环境下驾驶员危险感知研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Mar;166:106540. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106540. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
9
Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structural equation model: Considering the mediating role of trust.通过结构方程模型对 3 级自动驾驶接管行为进行建模:考虑信任的中介作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jul;157:106156. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106156. Epub 2021 May 3.
10
A Computational Cognitive Model of Driver Response Time for Scheduled Freeway Exiting Takeovers in Conditionally Automated Vehicles.条件自动化车辆高速公路出口接管计划中驾驶员响应时间的计算认知模型。
Hum Factors. 2024 May;66(5):1583-1599. doi: 10.1177/00187208221143028. Epub 2022 Dec 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Explaining human interactions on the road by large-scale integration of computational psychological theory.通过大规模整合计算心理学理论来解释道路上的人际互动。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Jun 20;2(6):pgad163. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad163. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Modelling communication-enabled traffic interactions.对支持通信的交通交互进行建模。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 May 24;10(5):230537. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230537. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Should I Stay or Should I Go? Cognitive Modeling of Left-Turn Gap Acceptance Decisions in Human Drivers.
我该留下还是离开?人类驾驶员左转间隙接受决策的认知建模。
Hum Factors. 2024 May;66(5):1399-1413. doi: 10.1177/00187208221144561. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
4
Object speed perception during lateral visual self-motion.侧向视觉自身运动过程中的目标速度感知。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jan;84(1):25-46. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02372-4. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
5
How Computational Modeling Can Force Theory Building in Psychological Science.计算建模如何推动心理科学中的理论构建。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;16(4):789-802. doi: 10.1177/1745691620970585. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
6
Human-like driving behaviour emerges from a risk-based driver model.类人驾驶行为源于基于风险的驾驶员模型。
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 29;11(1):4850. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18353-4.
7
Which parts of the road guide obstacle avoidance? Quantifying the driver's risk field.道路的哪些部分引导驾驶员避开障碍物?量化驾驶员的风险场。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Nov;89:103196. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103196. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
8
Social behavior for autonomous vehicles.自主车辆的社会行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 10;116(50):24972-24978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820676116. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
9
Perception of time to contact of slow- and fast-moving objects using monocular and binocular motion information.利用单眼和双眼运动信息对慢速和快速移动物体的接触时间感知。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Aug;80(6):1584-1590. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1517-8.
10
Sustained sensorimotor control as intermittent decisions about prediction errors: computational framework and application to ground vehicle steering.作为关于预测误差的间歇性决策的持续感觉运动控制:计算框架及其在地面车辆转向中的应用
Biol Cybern. 2018 Jun;112(3):181-207. doi: 10.1007/s00422-017-0743-9. Epub 2018 Feb 16.