• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际实施死亡率审查护理审查流程:在全球范围内切实提高质量和安全性。

International implementation of a care review process for mortality reviews: improving quality and safety virtually across the world.

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Health System in Eau Claire, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA

Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2023 May;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002230.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002230
PMID:37253530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10231000/
Abstract

Mortality reviews are intended to produce transparent, non-punitive personal and organisational learning that leads to systematic improvement in care. Mayo Clinic has a well-established care review process that has accomplished that objective within our system. The establishment of a new hospital, a joint venture between Mayo Clinic and Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City (SSMC) in Abu Dhabi, provided a unique opportunity to share this care review process internationally.During a baseline measurement period, only 78.3% of mortality reviews at SSMC were completed within 45 days, 16.7 percentage points below the target of 95%. A collaboration between SSMC and Mayo Clinic aimed to accelerate the design and implementation of a care review process system. Collaboration was constrained by travel restrictions imposed by COVID-19, language barriers, legal privacy concerns, and differing electronic health records.Mayo Clinic facilitated a 12-week virtual engagement with SSMC using weekly video meetings, education and training regarding Mayo Clinic's care review process.The engagement led to implementation of weekly mortality review huddles, restructuring of the mortality review committee to be multidisciplinary, use of a standardised taxonomy to characterise opportunities to improve care and creation of an education/communication plan regarding identified improvement opportunities using change management strategies.After the care review process for mortality reviews was instituted, SSMC achieved and sustained a target of 100% of mortality reviews completed within 45 days. The new process resulted in improved mortality review indicators and provided quality feedback to staff with engagement in performance improvement efforts.A virtual collaboration led to successful implementation of a care review process and substantial gains in the effectiveness of the quality programme at SSMC. This could serve as a model to assist other organisations, even if in-person engagement is hindered.

摘要

死亡率复核的目的是产生透明、非惩罚性的个人和组织学习,从而促使医疗照护系统得到系统性的改进。梅奥诊所拥有成熟的照护复核流程,在我们的体系内实现了这一目标。梅奥诊所与阿布扎比谢赫·沙克布特医学城(Shiekh Shakhbout Medical City,SSMC)合作建立了一家新医院,这为国际间分享这一照护复核流程提供了独特的机会。在基线测量期间,SSMC 仅有 78.3%的死亡率复核在 45 天内完成,比 95%的目标低 16.7 个百分点。SSMC 与梅奥诊所的合作旨在加速设计和实施照护复核流程系统。由于受到新冠疫情旅行限制、语言障碍、法律隐私问题以及电子健康记录不同的制约,合作受到了限制。梅奥诊所通过每周的视频会议、有关梅奥诊所照护复核流程的教育和培训,为 SSMC 提供了为期 12 周的虚拟参与机会。这次参与促使 SSMC 实施了每周死亡率复核碰头会、将死亡率复核委员会改组为多学科、使用标准化分类法来确定改善照护的机会,以及创建关于所确定改进机会的教育/沟通计划,使用了变革管理策略。在实施死亡率复核的照护复核流程后,SSMC 实现并维持了在 45 天内完成 100%死亡率复核的目标。新流程提高了死亡率复核指标,并通过参与绩效改进工作为员工提供了质量反馈。虚拟合作促成了照护复核流程的成功实施,并使 SSMC 的质量计划在效率上取得了显著提高。即使面对面的互动受到阻碍,这种模式也可以为其他组织提供帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13e5/10231000/dfe6d92de2a0/bmjoq-2022-002230f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13e5/10231000/f2dd2e3f36ce/bmjoq-2022-002230f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13e5/10231000/dfe6d92de2a0/bmjoq-2022-002230f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13e5/10231000/f2dd2e3f36ce/bmjoq-2022-002230f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13e5/10231000/dfe6d92de2a0/bmjoq-2022-002230f02.jpg

相似文献

1
International implementation of a care review process for mortality reviews: improving quality and safety virtually across the world.国际实施死亡率审查护理审查流程:在全球范围内切实提高质量和安全性。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 May;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002230.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
4
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Establishing a Clinical Laboratory in a Tertiary/Quaternary Care Greenfield Hospital in the Middle East: Recounting the Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi Experience.在中东的三级/四级保健绿地医院建立临床实验室:回顾克利夫兰诊所阿布扎比的经验。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018 Sep;142(9):1023-1035. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0518-RA.
9
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
10
Operation HOPE: Developing an international, intercultural partnership.
Nursing. 2022 Nov 1;52(11):43-46. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000884548.26594.fd.

本文引用的文献

1
Virtual learning collaboratives to improve urine culturing and antibiotic prescribing in long-term care: controlled before-and-after study.通过虚拟学习协作改善长期护理中的尿液培养和抗生素处方:前后对照研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Feb;31(2):94-104. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012226. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
2
Evaluation of a Virtual Learning Collaborative to Integrate Palliative Care Into Routine Oncology Practice.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Nov;16(11):e1371-e1377. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00254. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
3
The primary health care in the emirate of Abu Dhabi: are they aligned with the chronic care model elements?阿布扎比酋长国的初级医疗保健:它们与慢性病护理模式要素相符吗?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 14;17(1):725. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2691-4.
4
Evaluating inpatient mortality: a new electronic review process that gathers information from front-line providers.评估住院患者死亡率:一种新的电子审查流程,从一线医护人员处收集信息。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Jan;24(1):31-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003120. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
5
Primary care staff perspectives on a virtual learning collaborative to support medical home implementation.基层医疗人员对支持医疗之家实施的虚拟学习协作的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jul;29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S579-88. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2668-x.
6
Learning from every death.从每一次死亡中汲取教训。
J Patient Saf. 2014 Mar;10(1):6-12. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000053.
7
Accelerating the use of best practices: the Mayo Clinic Model of Diffusion.加速最佳实践的应用:梅奥诊所的扩散模式
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Apr;39(4):167-76. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39023-0.
8
AGA Task Force on Quality in Practice: a national overview and implications for GI practice.美国胃肠病学会实践质量特别工作组:全国概况及对胃肠病学实践的影响
Gastroenterology. 2005 Jul;129(1):361-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.05.028.
9
The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II.住院患者不良事件的性质。哈佛医疗实践研究II的结果。
N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):377-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240605.