Johnston A, Marsden J T, Holt D W
Ther Drug Monit. 1986;8(2):200-4. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198606000-00013.
Data from a quality assessment scheme designed to test the measurement of cyclosporin are presented. Almost all of the participating 27 centres were using a radioimmunoassay for the measurement and, during the course of 16 months, a number of variables were tested, including accuracy, sensitivity, recovery of added cyclosporin, and within- and between-assay reproducibility. Accuracy of the measurement, judged by the mean results for spiked samples, was good, but values varied widely. Sensitivity tended to be overestimated, with a significant number of false-positive results being reported. The precision profile for the assay showed that there was no intrinsic difference in the precision of measurement using either plasma or whole blood as the sample matrix; but reproducibility for patient samples tended to be better using blood because drug concentrations are higher compared with plasma. We conclude that, whereas the results overall were encouraging, there were wide between-centre variations for the measurement, which could be compounded even further by the use of plasma or serum as the sample matrix.
本文展示了一项旨在测试环孢素测量的质量评估计划的数据。参与的27个中心几乎都使用放射免疫分析法进行测量,在16个月的时间里,测试了多个变量,包括准确性、灵敏度、添加环孢素的回收率以及批内和批间的重复性。根据加标样品的平均结果判断,测量的准确性良好,但数值差异很大。灵敏度往往被高估,报告了大量假阳性结果。该分析方法的精密度曲线表明,以血浆或全血作为样品基质进行测量的精密度没有内在差异;但使用血液时患者样品的重复性往往更好,因为与血浆相比药物浓度更高。我们得出结论,虽然总体结果令人鼓舞,但各中心之间的测量结果存在很大差异,使用血浆或血清作为样品基质可能会使这种差异进一步加剧。