Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, Austria.
Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Jul 7;18(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad034.
Humans tend to automatically imitate others and their actions while also being able to control such imitative tendencies. Interference control, necessary to suppress own imitative tendencies, develops rapidly in childhood and adolescence, plateaus in adulthood and slowly declines with advancing age. It remains to be shown though which neural processes underpin these differences across the lifespan. In a cross-sectional functional magnetic resonance imaging study with three age groups (adolescents (ADs) 14-17 years, young adults (YAs) 21-31, older adults (OAs) 56-76, N = 91 healthy female participants), we investigated the behavioral and neural correlates of interference control in the context of automatic imitation using the finger-lifting task. ADs showed the most efficient interference control, while no significant differences emerged between YAs and OAs, despite OAs showing longer reaction times. On the neural level, all age groups showed engagement of the right temporoparietal junction, right supramarginal gyrus and bilateral insula, aligning well with studies previously using this task. However, our analyses did not reveal any age-related differences in brain activation, neither in these nor in other areas. This suggests that ADs might have a more efficient use of the engaged brain networks and, on the other hand, OAs' capacity for interference control and the associated brain functions might be largely preserved.
人类往往会自动模仿他人及其行为,同时也能够控制这种模仿倾向。干扰控制是抑制自身模仿倾向所必需的,它在儿童和青少年时期迅速发展,在成年期达到稳定,然后随着年龄的增长缓慢下降。然而,哪些神经过程支撑了整个生命周期中的这些差异仍有待证明。在一项具有三个年龄组(青少年(ADs)14-17 岁,年轻人(YAs)21-31 岁,老年人(OAs)56-76 岁,N=91 名健康女性参与者)的横断面功能磁共振成像研究中,我们使用手指提升任务研究了自动模仿背景下干扰控制的行为和神经相关性。ADs 表现出最有效的干扰控制,而 YAs 和 OAs 之间没有明显差异,尽管 OAs 的反应时间较长。在神经水平上,所有年龄组都表现出右侧颞顶联合区、右侧缘上回和双侧脑岛的参与,这与之前使用该任务的研究结果一致。然而,我们的分析并未揭示出大脑激活方面与年龄相关的任何差异,无论是在这些区域还是在其他区域。这表明 ADs 可能更有效地利用了参与的大脑网络,而另一方面,OAs 的干扰控制能力和相关的大脑功能可能在很大程度上得到了保留。