Liu Yu-Yao, Liao Fu-Juan, Li Yu-Shan, Chen Hong-Ping, Wang Fu, Hu Yuan, Liu You-Ping
State Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu 611137, China.
Maize Research Institute of Sichuan Agricultural University Chengdu 611130, China.
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2023 Apr;48(7):1876-1884. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20220920.301.
To study the effects of different drying methods on the quality of male flowers of Eucommia ulmoides(MFOEU), we treated fresh MFOEU samples with drying in the shade(DS), vacuum freeze drying(VFD), high-or low-temperature hot air drying(HTHAD, LTHAD), microwave drying(MD), and vacuum drying(VD), respectively. The color, total flavonoid content, total polysaccharide content, and main active components such as geniposide, geniposidic acid, rutin, chlorogenic acid, galuteolin, pinoresinol diglucoside, and aucubin in MFOEU were taken as the evaluation indicators. The quality of MFOEU was comprehensively evaluated by entropy weight method combined with color index method, partial least squares discriminant analysis and content clustering heat map. The experimental results showed that VFD and DS basically kept the original color of MFOEU. The MFOEU treated with MD had higher content of total polysaccharides, phenylpropanoids, lignans, and iridoids. The MFOEU treated with LTHAD had higher content of total flavonoids and that treated with VD had lower content of active components. According to the results of comprehensive evaluation, the quality of MFOEU dried with different methods followed the order of MD>HTHAD>VFD>LTHAD>DS>VD. Considering the color of MFOEU, the suitable drying methods were DS and VFD. Considering the color, active components, and economic benefits of MFOEU, MD was the suitable drying method. The results of this study are of a reference value for the determination of suitable methods for MFOEU processing in the producing areas.
为研究不同干燥方法对杜仲雄花质量的影响,我们分别采用阴干(DS)、真空冷冻干燥(VFD)、高温或低温热风干燥(HTHAD、LTHAD)、微波干燥(MD)和真空干燥(VD)处理新鲜杜仲雄花样品。以杜仲雄花的颜色、总黄酮含量、总多糖含量以及京尼平苷、京尼平苷酸、芦丁、绿原酸、木犀草素、松脂醇二葡萄糖苷和桃叶珊瑚苷等主要活性成分为评价指标。采用熵权法结合颜色指数法、偏最小二乘判别分析和含量聚类热图对杜仲雄花质量进行综合评价。实验结果表明,VFD和DS基本保持了杜仲雄花的原色。经MD处理的杜仲雄花总多糖、苯丙素类、木脂素类和环烯醚萜类含量较高。经LTHAD处理的杜仲雄花总黄酮含量较高,经VD处理的杜仲雄花活性成分含量较低。综合评价结果显示,不同方法干燥的杜仲雄花质量顺序为MD>HTHAD>VFD>LTHAD>DS>VD。考虑到杜仲雄花的颜色,适宜的干燥方法是DS和VFD。综合考虑杜仲雄花的颜色、活性成分和经济效益,MD是适宜的干燥方法。本研究结果对产区杜仲雄花加工适宜方法的确定具有参考价值。