Suppr超能文献

双侧重度至极重度听力损失使用辅助设备后的健康效用值

Health Utilities of Bilateral Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss with Assistive Devices.

作者信息

Chen Yi-Wen, Lin Pei-Hsuan, Fang Te-Yung, Wu Chen-Chi, Wang Pa-Chun, Wang Han, Ko Yu

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11696, Taiwan.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 5;11(11):1649. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111649.

Abstract

Hearing loss is a common sensory disorder in newborns. Early intervention with assistive devices benefits children's auditory and speech performance. This study aimed to measure the health utilities of children with bilateral severe-to-profound hearing impairment with different assistive devices. The descriptions of four hypothetical health states were developed, and their utility values were obtained from healthcare professionals via the visual analogue scale (VAS) and time trade-off (TTO) methods. Thirty-seven healthcare professionals completed the TTO interview and were included in the analysis. The mean utility scores obtained via VAS were 0.31 for no assistive devices, 0.41 for bilateral hearing aids, 0.63 for bimodal hearing, and 0.82 for bilateral cochlear implants. As for the utility scores obtained via TTO, mean values were 0.60, 0.69, 0.81, and 0.90, respectively. None of the four groups had the same VAS- or TTO-elicited utility ( < 0.001). The post hoc test results showed that the difference was significant between any two groups (all < 0.05). In conclusion, this study elicited health utility of bilateral hearing impairment with different assistive devices using the VAS and TTO methods. The utility values obtained provide critical data for future cost-utility analysis and health technology assessment.

摘要

听力损失是新生儿常见的感觉障碍。使用辅助设备进行早期干预有利于儿童的听觉和言语表现。本研究旨在测量不同辅助设备对双侧重度至极重度听力障碍儿童的健康效用值。构建了四种假设健康状态的描述,并通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)和时间权衡法(TTO)从医疗保健专业人员处获取其效用值。37名医疗保健专业人员完成了TTO访谈并纳入分析。通过VAS获得的平均效用得分,无辅助设备组为0.31,双侧助听器组为0.41,双模式听力组为0.63,双侧人工耳蜗植入组为0.82。至于通过TTO获得的效用得分,平均值分别为0.60、0.69、0.81和0.90。四组中没有一组的VAS或TTO效用值相同(<0.001)。事后检验结果表明,任意两组之间的差异均具有统计学意义(均<0.05)。总之,本研究使用VAS和TTO方法得出了不同辅助设备对双侧听力障碍的健康效用值。所获得的效用值为未来的成本效用分析和卫生技术评估提供了关键数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5aee/10252331/3a7612fb40e5/healthcare-11-01649-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验