• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国 2021 年 4 月 1 日至 5 月 31 日,在无人陪伴儿童急诊收治点实施疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)关于检测、隔离、检疫和流动的 COVID-19 建议。

The Implementation of CDC COVID-19 Recommendations for Testing, Isolation, Quarantine and Movement at Emergency Intake Sites of Unaccompanied Children in the United States, April 1-May 31, 2021.

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.

Administration for Children and Families (ACF), 330 C St. SW, Washington, DC, 20201, USA.

出版信息

J Immigr Minor Health. 2023 Oct;25(5):1059-1064. doi: 10.1007/s10903-023-01495-0. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10903-023-01495-0
PMID:37314607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10265554/
Abstract

In March 2021, Emergency Intake Sites (EIS) were created to address capacity shortfalls during a surge of Unaccompanied Children at the Mexico-United States land border. The COVID-19 Zone Plan (ZP) was developed to decrease COVID-19 transmission. COVID-19 cumulative percent (%) positivity was analyzed to evaluate the impact of the ZP, venue type and bed capacity across EIS from April 1-May 31, 2021. Results: Of 11 EIS sites analyzed, 54% implemented the recommended ZP. The overall % positivity was 2.47% (95% CI 2.39-2.55). The % positivity at EIS with the ZP, 1.83% (95% CI 1.71-1.95), was lower than that at EIS without the ZP, 2.83%, ( 95% CI 2.72-2.93), and showed a lower 7-day moving average of % positivity. Conclusion: Results showed a possible effect of the ZP on % positivity when controlling for venue type and bed capacity in a specific EIS group comparison, indicating that all three variables could have had effect on % positivity. They also showed that smaller intake facilities may be recommendable during public health emergencies.

摘要

2021 年 3 月,设立了紧急收容所(EIS),以解决美墨边境无人陪伴儿童激增带来的收容能力不足的问题。制定了 COVID-19 区计划(ZP)以减少 COVID-19 的传播。分析了 COVID-19 累计阳性率(%),以评估 ZP、场地类型和收容所床位容量对 2021 年 4 月 1 日至 5 月 31 日期间 EIS 的影响。结果:在所分析的 11 个 EIS 中,有 54%实施了建议的 ZP。总体阳性率为 2.47%(95%CI 2.39-2.55)。实施 ZP 的 EIS 的阳性率为 1.83%(95%CI 1.71-1.95),低于未实施 ZP 的 EIS 的阳性率 2.83%(95%CI 2.72-2.93),且 7 天移动平均阳性率也较低。结论:在特定 EIS 组比较中,当控制场地类型和床位容量时,结果显示 ZP 对阳性率可能有影响,表明这三个变量都可能对阳性率有影响。研究结果还表明,在公共卫生紧急情况下,较小的收容设施可能是推荐的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e761/10509073/52506ab4c8d8/10903_2023_1495_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e761/10509073/cb9bab058229/10903_2023_1495_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e761/10509073/52506ab4c8d8/10903_2023_1495_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e761/10509073/cb9bab058229/10903_2023_1495_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e761/10509073/52506ab4c8d8/10903_2023_1495_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Implementation of CDC COVID-19 Recommendations for Testing, Isolation, Quarantine and Movement at Emergency Intake Sites of Unaccompanied Children in the United States, April 1-May 31, 2021.美国 2021 年 4 月 1 日至 5 月 31 日,在无人陪伴儿童急诊收治点实施疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)关于检测、隔离、检疫和流动的 COVID-19 建议。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2023 Oct;25(5):1059-1064. doi: 10.1007/s10903-023-01495-0. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
2
COVID-19 testing, incidence, and positivity trends among school age children during the academic years 2020-2022 in the State of Qatar: special focus on using CDC indicators for community transmission to evaluate school attendance policies and public health response.2020-2022 学年卡塔尔学龄儿童的 COVID-19 检测、发病率和阳性率趋势:特别关注使用疾控中心社区传播指标评估学校出勤政策和公共卫生应对措施。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 May 30;24(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04833-9.
3
Early public adherence with and support for stay-at-home COVID-19 mitigation strategies despite adverse life impact: a transnational cross-sectional survey study in the United States and Australia.尽管对生活产生了不利影响,公众仍早期坚持并支持 COVID-19 居家缓解策略:一项针对美国和澳大利亚的跨国横断面调查研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 15;21(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10410-x.
4
Community-Based Testing Sites for SARS-CoV-2 - United States, March 2020-November 2021.社区新冠病毒检测点-美国,2020 年 3 月-2021 年 11 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Dec 10;70(49):1706-1711. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7049a3.
5
Assessment of a Multifaceted Approach, Including Frequent PCR Testing, to Mitigation of COVID-19 Transmission at a Residential Historically Black University.评估多方面措施,包括频繁进行 PCR 检测,以减轻历史上的黑人大学的 COVID-19 传播。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2137189. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37189.
6
Trends in Disease Severity and Health Care Utilization During the Early Omicron Variant Period Compared with Previous SARS-CoV-2 High Transmission Periods - United States, December 2020-January 2022.疾病严重程度和医疗保健利用趋势在奥密克戎变异株早期与之前 SARS-CoV-2 高传播期相比-美国,2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 1 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 28;71(4):146-152. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e4.
7
Impact of Public Health and Social Measures on the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States and Other Countries: Descriptive Analysis.公共卫生与社会措施对美国及其他国家新冠疫情的影响:描述性分析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jun 2;7(6):e27917. doi: 10.2196/27917.
8
Physical distancing reduced the incidence of influenza and supports a favorable impact on SARS-CoV-2 spread in Mexico.保持社交距离降低了流感发病率,并对墨西哥的新冠病毒传播产生了有利影响。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020 Sep 30;14(9):953-956. doi: 10.3855/jidc.13250.
9
Implementation of a COVID-19 Infection Control Plan in a Large Urban Jail System.在一个大型城市监狱系统中实施 COVID-19 感染控制计划。
Public Health Rep. 2022 May-Jun;137(3):442-448. doi: 10.1177/00333549221076551. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
10
CDC Deployments to State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Health Departments for COVID-19 Emergency Public Health Response - United States, January 21-July 25, 2020.美国疾病控制与预防中心向州、部落、地方和地区卫生部门部署应对 COVID-19 紧急公共卫生反应的情况-2020 年 1 月 21 日至 7 月 25 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 2;69(39):1398-1403. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6939a3.

本文引用的文献

1
Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities.在 COVID-19 爆发期间保护弱势群体的策略的可接受性和可行性:在六个苏丹社区的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 16;21(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11187-9.
2
Response strategies for COVID-19 epidemics in African settings: a mathematical modelling study.非洲环境下应对 COVID-19 疫情的策略:一项数学建模研究。
BMC Med. 2020 Oct 14;18(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01789-2.
3
Evidence on public health interventions in humanitarian crises.
人道主义危机中的公共卫生干预措施的证据。
Lancet. 2017 Nov 18;390(10109):2287-2296. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30768-1. Epub 2017 Jun 8.