• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Older Adults' Perspectives of Independence Through Time: Results of a Longitudinal Interview Study.老年人对时间推移中的独立性的看法:一项纵向访谈研究的结果。
Gerontologist. 2024 Feb 1;64(2). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad073.
2
Is the Australian 75+ Health Assessment person-centred? A qualitative descriptive study of older people's perceptions.澳大利亚75岁及以上健康评估是以患者为中心的吗?一项关于老年人认知的定性描述性研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Dec;41(6):606-612. doi: 10.1071/AH15243.
3
Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于社区的复杂干预措施,针对体弱老年人维持其独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(48):1-194. doi: 10.3310/HNRP2514.
4
Improving early detection initiatives: a qualitative study exploring perspectives of older people and professionals.改善早期检测措施:一项探索老年人和专业人员观点的定性研究
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jun 23;17(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0521-5.
5
Consumer views about aging-in-place.消费者对原地养老的看法。
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Nov 4;10:1803-11. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S90672. eCollection 2015.
6
Factors influencing community-dwelling older adults' readiness to adopt smart home technology: A qualitative exploratory study.影响社区居住的老年人采用智能家居技术准备度的因素:一项定性探索性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Dec;77(12):4847-4861. doi: 10.1111/jan.14996. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
7
Older adults' experiences of self-determination when needing homecare services-an interview study.老年人在需要家庭护理服务时的自主体验:一项访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Dec 8;23(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04533-6.
8
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
9
How Prefrail Older People Living Alone Perceive Information and Communications Technology and What They Would Ask a Robot for: Qualitative Study.独居的衰弱前期老年人如何看待信息通信技术以及他们会向机器人提出什么请求:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 6;21(8):e13228. doi: 10.2196/13228.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoring system and seven factors associated with certification for Japanese long-term care insurance in older people.一种与日本老年人长期护理保险认证相关的评分系统和七个因素。
J Bone Miner Metab. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s00774-025-01606-x.
2
The Safety-Autonomy Grid: A Flexible Framework for Navigating Protection and Independence for Older Adults.安全-自主性网格:一个用于平衡老年人保护与独立性的灵活框架。
Gerontologist. 2025 May 10;65(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf111.
3
Healthy aging in frail older adults: Active aging project of a national survey.体弱老年人的健康老龄化:一项全国性调查的积极老龄化项目
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Jan 27;8:100302. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100302. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Who breaks their hip? A decade of traumatic hip fracture data.谁会髋部骨折?十年创伤性髋部骨折数据。
J Orthop. 2024 Oct 11;62:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.016. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Older Adults Documenting Purpose and Meaning Through Photovoice and Narratives.老年人通过摄影发声和叙事记录目的与意义。
Gerontologist. 2023 Sep 2;63(8):1289-1299. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad008.
2
Self-perceived functioning and (instrumental) activities of daily living questionnaires after a hip fracture: Do they tell the same story?髋部骨折后自我感知功能和(工具性)日常生活活动问卷:它们讲述的是同一个故事吗?
Age Ageing. 2022 Nov 2;51(11). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac259.
3
Precarity and the Pandemic: The Impact of COVID-19 on Single Men Living Alone.脆弱与大流行:COVID-19 对独居单身男性的影响。
Gerontologist. 2023 Jan 24;63(1):131-139. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac129.
4
Being more than "just a bog-standard knee": the role of person-centred practice in physiotherapy: a narrative inquiry.不仅仅是“一个普通的膝盖”:以患者为中心的实践在物理治疗中的作用:一项叙事探究
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Oct;44(20):5847-5854. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1948118. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
5
Transitions from healthcare to self-care: a qualitative study of falls service practitioners' views on self-management.从医疗保健到自我保健的转变:对跌倒服务从业者自我管理观点的定性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2683-2690. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1849423. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
6
"Fiercely independent": Experiences of aging in the right place of older women living alone with physical limitations.“强烈的独立性”:身体受限独自生活的老年女性在合适的地方养老的体验。
J Aging Stud. 2020 Sep;54:100875. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100875. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
7
Understanding the care and support needs of older people: a scoping review and categorisation using the WHO international classification of functioning, disability and health framework (ICF).了解老年人的护理和支持需求:使用世界卫生组织国际功能、残疾和健康分类框架 (ICF) 进行的范围综述和分类。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jul 22;19(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1189-9.
8
Community ageing research 75+ study (CARE75+): an experimental ageing and frailty research cohort.社区老龄化研究 75+研究(CARE75+):一个实验性的老龄化和虚弱研究队列。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 7;9(3):e026744. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026744.
9
Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?代码饱和度与意义饱和度:多少次访谈才算足够?
Qual Health Res. 2017 Mar;27(4):591-608. doi: 10.1177/1049732316665344. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
10
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.

老年人对时间推移中的独立性的看法:一项纵向访谈研究的结果。

Older Adults' Perspectives of Independence Through Time: Results of a Longitudinal Interview Study.

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2024 Feb 1;64(2). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad073.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnad073
PMID:37330641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10825833/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Understanding how older people experience independence has implications for person-centered care. Existing understanding of older people's experience of independence, generated through methods that provide a "snapshot" view of a person's independence at a given time point, provides little insight into the process of maintaining independence through time. The aim of this study was to explore older participants' perceptions to understand the processes and resources that were most important for maintaining independence.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Two semistructured interviews were conducted longitudinally to explore the perspectives of 12 community-dwelling, older people, aged 76-85 years. A social constructivist approach, using dramaturgical and descriptive codes, facilitated the interpretation of the data. Sixteen analytical questions guided the exploration of participants' perceptions of independence through time.

RESULTS

Older people suggested that objective representations underestimated, and omitted, important aspects of their independence through time. Some participants perceived "snapshot" judgments of their independence as insensitive to their individual values and context. Change over time required some participants to adapt their methods for maintaining independence. The stability of participants' sense of independence was value dependent and informed by the purpose a participant ascribed to maintaining independence.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

This study augments the understanding of independence as a complex and multifaceted construct. The findings challenge the congruence of common interpretations of independence with older people's views, showing areas of commonality, and discrepancy. Exploration of independence in terms of form and function provides an important understanding of how function takes precedence to form in determining the maintenance of independence through time.

摘要

背景和目的

理解老年人如何体验独立性对以患者为中心的护理具有重要意义。现有关于老年人独立性体验的理解是通过在特定时间点提供个人独立性“快照”的方法得出的,这些方法几乎无法深入了解随着时间推移维持独立性的过程。本研究旨在探索老年人的认知,以了解对维持独立性最重要的过程和资源。

研究设计和方法

通过两次半结构化访谈,从纵向角度探讨了 12 名居住在社区的、年龄在 76-85 岁的老年人的观点。采用社会建构主义方法,使用戏剧性和描述性代码,有助于解释数据。16 个分析问题指导了对参与者随着时间推移对独立性的认知的探索。

结果

老年人认为客观表现低估了,并且忽略了他们随着时间推移的独立性的重要方面。一些参与者认为对他们独立性的“快照”判断对他们的个人价值观和背景不敏感。随着时间的变化,一些参与者需要调整他们维持独立性的方法。参与者对独立性的稳定性取决于其个人价值观念,并受到参与者赋予维持独立性的目的的影响。

讨论和意义

本研究增强了对独立性作为一个复杂和多方面的概念的理解。研究结果挑战了人们对独立性的常见解释与老年人观点之间的一致性,展示了共同点和差异点。从形式和功能的角度探讨独立性,为了解功能在确定随着时间推移维持独立性方面的重要性提供了重要的认识。