Madrid-Gambin Francisco, Oller Sergio, Marco Santiago, Pozo Óscar J, Andres-Lacueva Cristina, Llorach Rafael
Applied Metabolomics Research Group, IMIM-Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona, Spain.
Signal and Information Processing for Sensing Systems, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Front Mol Biosci. 2023 Jun 2;10:1125582. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1125582. eCollection 2023.
There is evidence that sample treatment of blood-based biosamples may affect integral signals in nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics. The presence of macromolecules in plasma/serum samples makes investigating low-molecular-weight metabolites challenging. It is particularly relevant in the targeted approach, in which absolute concentrations of selected metabolites are often quantified based on the area of integral signals. Since there are a few treatments of plasma/serum samples for quantitative analysis without a universally accepted method, this topic remains of interest for future research. In this work, targeted metabolomic profiling of 43 metabolites was performed on pooled plasma to compare four methodologies consisting of Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) editing, ultrafiltration, protein precipitation with methanol, and glycerophospholipid solid-phase extraction (g-SPE) for phospholipid removal; prior to NMR metabolomics analysis. The effect of the sample treatments on the metabolite concentrations was evaluated using a permutation test of multiclass and pairwise Fisher scores. Results showed that methanol precipitation and ultrafiltration had a higher number of metabolites with coefficient of variation (CV) values above 20%. G-SPE and CPMG editing demonstrated better precision for most of the metabolites analyzed. However, differential quantification performance between procedures were metabolite-dependent. For example, pairwise comparisons showed that methanol precipitation and CPMG editing were suitable for quantifying citrate, while g-SPE showed better results for 2-hydroxybutyrate and tryptophan. There are alterations in the absolute concentration of various metabolites that are dependent on the procedure. Considering these alterations is essential before proceeding with the quantification of treatment-sensitive metabolites in biological samples for improving biomarker discovery and biological interpretations. The study demonstrated that g-SPE and CPMG editing are effective methods for removing proteins and phospholipids from plasma samples for quantitative NMR analysis of metabolites. However, careful consideration should be given to the specific metabolites of interest and their susceptibility to the sample treatment procedures. These findings contribute to the development of optimized sample preparation protocols for metabolomics studies using NMR spectroscopy.
有证据表明,基于血液的生物样本的样品处理可能会影响基于核磁共振的代谢组学中的积分信号。血浆/血清样本中大分子的存在使得研究低分子量代谢物具有挑战性。这在靶向方法中尤为重要,在该方法中,选定代谢物的绝对浓度通常基于积分信号的面积进行定量。由于目前尚无普遍接受的方法用于血浆/血清样本的定量分析处理,因此该主题仍是未来研究的热点。在这项工作中,对混合血浆进行了43种代谢物的靶向代谢组学分析,以比较四种方法,包括Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill(CPMG)编辑、超滤、甲醇蛋白沉淀和甘油磷脂固相萃取(g-SPE)去除磷脂;在进行核磁共振代谢组学分析之前。使用多类和成对Fisher评分的置换检验评估样品处理对代谢物浓度的影响。结果表明,甲醇沉淀和超滤有更多代谢物的变异系数(CV)值高于20%。G-SPE和CPMG编辑对大多数分析的代谢物显示出更好的精密度。然而,不同方法之间的差异定量性能取决于代谢物。例如,成对比较表明,甲醇沉淀和CPMG编辑适用于定量柠檬酸盐,而g-SPE对2-羟基丁酸盐和色氨酸显示出更好的结果。各种代谢物的绝对浓度存在依赖于处理程序的变化。在对生物样本中对处理敏感的代谢物进行定量之前,考虑这些变化对于改善生物标志物发现和生物学解释至关重要。该研究表明,g-SPE和CPMG编辑是从血浆样本中去除蛋白质和磷脂以进行代谢物定量核磁共振分析的有效方法。然而,应仔细考虑感兴趣的特定代谢物及其对样品处理程序的敏感性。这些发现有助于开发用于核磁共振光谱代谢组学研究的优化样品制备方案。
Front Mol Biosci. 2023-6-2
Metabolomics. 2019-5-24
J Proteome Res. 2017-4-7
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012-2-28
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2024-5-15
N Biotechnol. 2022-5-25
Molecules. 2020-11-4