King William P, Sietsema Margaret, McClain Caitlin, Xu Susan, Dhrimaj Helion
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236.
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago IL.
J Int Soc Respir Prot. 2017 Dec 31;34(2):81-94.
As part of development of performance standards, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) technical committee, ISO/TC 94/SC 15 Respiratory protective devices (RPD), adopted work of breathing (WOB) to evaluate airflow resistance for all designs (classes) of respiratory protective devices. The interests of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL) are to compare the proposed WOB method and results for current RPD with those for present resistance methods. The objectives here were to assemble a method to meet the ISO SC15 standards, validate operation and conformance, and assess repeatability of WOB measurements for RPD. WOB method implementation and use followed standards ISO 16900-5:2016 and ISO 16900-12:2016. Volume-averaged total work of breathing (WOB/V where V is tidal volume) determined for standard orifices was analyzed for variation and bias. After fabrication and assembly, the method gave preliminary verification orifice results that met ISO requirements and were equivalent to those from other laboratories. Evaluation of additional results from RPD testing showed tidal volume and frequency determined compliance. Appropriate adjustments reduced average absolute bias to 1.7%. Average coefficient of variation for WOB/V was 2.3%. Over 97% of results obtained during significant use over time met specifications. WOB/V for as-received air-purifying and supplied-air RPD were repeatable (p<0.05). WOB/V for unsealed half mask air-purifying RPD was an average of 31% lower compared to sealed. When experimental parameters were appropriately adjusted, the ISO WOB method implemented by NIOSH NPPTL consistently provided ISO-compliant verification WOB/V. Results for appropriately sealed RPD were reproducible.
作为性能标准制定工作的一部分,国际标准化组织(ISO)技术委员会ISO/TC 94/SC 15呼吸防护装置(RPD)采用了呼吸功(WOB)来评估所有设计(类别)呼吸防护装置的气流阻力。美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)的国家个人防护技术实验室(NPPTL)的目的是将拟议的WOB方法及当前RPD的结果与现有阻力方法的结果进行比较。此处的目标是汇编一种符合ISO SC15标准的方法,验证操作与符合性,并评估RPD的WOB测量的可重复性。WOB方法的实施和使用遵循ISO 16900-5:2016和ISO 16900-12:2016标准。分析了标准孔板的体积平均总呼吸功(WOB/V,其中V为潮气量)的变化和偏差。制造和组装后,该方法给出了符合ISO要求且与其他实验室结果相当的初步验证孔板结果。对RPD测试的其他结果的评估表明,潮气量和频率符合规定。适当调整将平均绝对偏差降低至1.7%。WOB/V的平均变异系数为2.3%。在长期大量使用期间获得的结果中,超过97%符合规格。新收到的空气净化式和供气式RPD的WOB/V是可重复的(p<0.05)。与密封的半面罩空气净化式RPD相比,未密封的WOB/V平均低31%。当实验参数得到适当调整时,NIOSH NPPTL实施的ISO WOB方法始终能提供符合ISO标准的验证WOB/V。适当密封的RPD的结果具有可重复性。