• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于接触者追踪应用程序的隐私权衡模型:通过纵向用户研究分析德国新冠警示应用程序的使用行为。

A privacy calculus model for contact tracing apps: Analyzing the use behavior of the German Corona-Warn-App with a longitudinal user study.

作者信息

Harborth David, Pape Sebastian

机构信息

Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 4, 60326 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Comput Secur. 2023 Sep;132:103338. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2023.103338. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.cose.2023.103338
PMID:37334178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10264164/
Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is a pressing societal issue today. The German government promotes a contract tracing app named Corona-Warn-App (CWA), aiming to change citizens' health behaviors during the pandemic by raising awareness about potential infections and enable infection chain tracking. Technical implementations, citizens' perceptions, and public debates around apps differ between countries, e. g., in Germany there has been a huge discussion on potential privacy issues of the app. Thus, we analyze effects of privacy concerns regarding the CWA, perceived CWA benefits, and trust in the German healthcare system to answer why citizens use the CWA. In our initial conference publication at , we used a sample with 1752 actual users and non-users of the CWA and and support for the privacy calculus theory, i. e., individuals weigh privacy concerns and benefits in their use decision. Thus, citizens privacy perceptions about health technologies (e. g., shaped by public debates) are crucial as they can hinder adoption and negatively affect future fights against pandemics. In this special issue, we adapt our previous work by conducting a second survey 10 months after our initial study with the same pool of participants (830 participants from the first study participated in the second survey). The goal of this longitudinal study is to assess changes in the perceptions of users and non-users over time and to evaluate the influence of the significantly lower hospitalization and death rates on the use behavior which we could observe during the second survey. Our results show that the privacy calculus is relatively stable over time. The only relationship which significantly changes over time is the effect of privacy concerns on the use behavior which significantly decreases over time, i. e., privacy concerns have a lower negative effect one the CWA use indicating that it did not play such an important role in the use decision at a later point in time in the pandemic. We contribute to the literature by introducing one of the rare longitudinal analyses in the literature focusing on the privacy calculus and changes over time in the relevant constructs as well as the relationships between the calculus constructs and target variables (in our case use behavior of a contact tracing app). We can see that the explanatory power of the privacy calculus model is relatively stable over time even if strong externalities might affect individual perceptions related to the model.

摘要

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行是当今一个紧迫的社会问题。德国政府推广一款名为“新冠预警应用程序”(Corona-Warn-App,CWA)的接触者追踪应用程序,旨在通过提高对潜在感染的认识来改变公民在大流行期间的健康行为,并实现感染链追踪。不同国家在应用程序的技术实施、公民认知以及围绕应用程序的公众辩论方面存在差异,例如,在德国,围绕该应用程序潜在的隐私问题进行了大量讨论。因此,我们分析了对CWA的隐私担忧、感知到的CWA益处以及对德国医疗保健系统的信任所产生的影响,以回答公民使用CWA的原因。在我们最初在会议上发表的论文中,我们使用了一个包含1752名CWA实际用户和非用户的样本,并支持隐私计算理论,即个人在使用决策中权衡隐私担忧和益处。因此,公民对健康技术的隐私认知(例如,由公众辩论形成)至关重要,因为它们可能会阻碍采用,并对未来抗击大流行产生负面影响。在本期特刊中,我们对之前的研究进行了调整,在最初研究10个月后,对同一批参与者(来自第一项研究的830名参与者参与了第二项调查)进行了第二次调查。这项纵向研究的目的是评估用户和非用户的认知随时间的变化,并评估在第二次调查期间我们能够观察到的显著降低的住院率和死亡率对使用行为的影响。我们的结果表明,隐私计算随时间相对稳定。随着时间推移唯一显著变化的关系是隐私担忧对使用行为的影响,这种影响随着时间显著下降,即隐私担忧对CWA使用的负面影响较小,表明在大流行后期的使用决策中它没有起到如此重要的作用。我们通过引入文献中罕见的纵向分析来为该领域做出贡献,该分析聚焦于隐私计算以及相关构念随时间的变化,以及计算构念与目标变量(在我们的案例中是接触者追踪应用程序的使用行为)之间的关系。我们可以看到,即使强大的外部因素可能会影响与该模型相关的个人认知,但隐私计算模型的解释力随时间相对稳定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188e/10264164/026ebab35576/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188e/10264164/05ef60bc8d9f/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188e/10264164/1bb549806256/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188e/10264164/026ebab35576/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188e/10264164/05ef60bc8d9f/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188e/10264164/1bb549806256/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188e/10264164/026ebab35576/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
A privacy calculus model for contact tracing apps: Analyzing the use behavior of the German Corona-Warn-App with a longitudinal user study.用于接触者追踪应用程序的隐私权衡模型:通过纵向用户研究分析德国新冠警示应用程序的使用行为。
Comput Secur. 2023 Sep;132:103338. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2023.103338. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
2
Why Individuals Do (Not) Use Contact Tracing Apps: A Health Belief Model Perspective on the German Corona-Warn-App.为何个人使用(或不使用)接触者追踪应用程序:基于健康信念模型对德国新冠预警应用程序的探讨
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 15;11(4):583. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040583.
3
Investigating Citizens' Acceptance of Contact Tracing Apps: Quantitative Study of the Role of Trust and Privacy.调查公民对接种追踪应用程序的接受程度:信任和隐私作用的定量研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 18;12:e48700. doi: 10.2196/48700.
4
The Impact of Individuals' Social Environments on Contact Tracing App Use: Survey Study.个体社会环境对接触者追踪应用程序使用的影响:调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 May 31;10:e45825. doi: 10.2196/45825.
5
Prosociality and the Uptake of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Survey Analysis of Intergenerational Differences in Japan.亲社会行为与 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的采用:日本代际差异的调查分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 19;9(8):e29923. doi: 10.2196/29923.
6
Modeling Trust in COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Apps Using the Human-Computer Trust Scale: Online Survey Study.使用人机信任量表对新冠疫情接触者追踪应用程序中的信任进行建模:在线调查研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jun 13;9(2):e33951. doi: 10.2196/33951.
7
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
8
The Roles of Trust in Government and Sense of Community in the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Privacy Calculus: Mixed Method Study Using a 2-Wave Survey and In-Depth Interviews.信任政府和社区意识在 COVID-19 接触者追踪隐私计算中的作用:使用两波调查和深入访谈的混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 7;12:e48986. doi: 10.2196/48986.
9
Psychological factors shaping public responses to COVID-19 digital contact tracing technologies in Germany.塑造公众对德国 COVID-19 数字接触追踪技术反应的心理因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 21;11(1):18716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98249-5.
10
Self-Focused and Other-Focused Health Concerns as Predictors of the Uptake of Corona Contact Tracing Apps: Empirical Study.自我关注和他人关注的健康问题作为接受新冠接触者追踪应用的预测因素:实证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 10;23(8):e29268. doi: 10.2196/29268.

引用本文的文献

1
The Way Forward to Embrace Artificial Intelligence in Public Health.公共卫生领域拥抱人工智能的前进道路。
Am J Public Health. 2025 Feb;115(2):123-128. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307888. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
2
Antecedents predicting digital contact tracing acceptance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预测数字接触者追踪接受度的前置因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 11;23(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02313-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Young Adults View Smartphone Tracking Technologies for COVID-19 as Acceptable: The Case of Taiwan.年轻人认为智能手机追踪 COVID-19 技术是可以接受的:以台湾为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1332. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031332.
2
Digital contact-tracing during the Covid-19 pandemic: An analysis of newspaper coverage in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.新冠疫情期间的数字接触者追踪:对德国、奥地利和瑞士报纸报道的分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 3;16(2):e0246524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246524. eCollection 2021.
3
Public acceptance of privacy-encroaching policies to address the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom.
公众对侵犯隐私的政策的接受程度,以应对英国的 COVID-19 大流行。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245740. eCollection 2021.
4
Tracking and promoting the usage of a COVID-19 contact tracing app.追踪和推广使用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Feb;5(2):247-255. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01044-x. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
5
The Role of Transparency, Trust, and Social Influence on Uncertainty Reduction in Times of Pandemics: Empirical Study on the Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps.透明度、信任和社会影响在大流行时期减少不确定性的作用:对 COVID-19 追踪应用程序采用的实证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e25893. doi: 10.2196/25893.
6
Who does or does not use the 'Corona-Warn-App' and why?谁使用或不使用“Corona-Warn-App”,为什么?
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Feb 1;31(1):49-51. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa239.
7
Individuals' privacy concerns and adoption of contact tracing mobile applications in a pandemic: A situational privacy calculus perspective.个人隐私顾虑与疫情期间接触者追踪移动应用的采用:情境隐私计算视角。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 1;28(3):463-471. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa240.
8
A national survey of attitudes to COVID-19 digital contact tracing in the Republic of Ireland.爱尔兰共和国对 COVID-19 数字接触追踪的全国性态度调查。
Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Aug;190(3):863-887. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02389-y. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
9
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.基于应用程序的 COVID-19 接触者追踪的可接受性:跨国调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
10
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.