• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对侵犯隐私的政策的接受程度,以应对英国的 COVID-19 大流行。

Public acceptance of privacy-encroaching policies to address the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom.

机构信息

University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245740. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0245740
PMID:33481877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7822290/
Abstract

The nature of the COVID-19 pandemic may require governments to use privacy-encroaching technologies to help contain its spread. One technology involves co-location tracking through mobile Wi-Fi, GPS, and Bluetooth to permit health agencies to monitor people's contact with each other, thereby triggering targeted social-distancing when a person turns out to be infected. The effectiveness of tracking relies on the willingness of the population to support such privacy encroaching measures. We report the results of two large surveys in the United Kingdom, conducted during the peak of the pandemic, that probe people's attitudes towards various tracking technologies. The results show that by and large there is widespread acceptance for co-location tracking. Acceptance increases when the measures are explicitly time-limited and come with opt-out clauses or other assurances of privacy. Another possible future technology to control the pandemic involves "immunity passports", which could be issued to people who carry antibodies for the COVID-19 virus, potentially implying that they are immune and therefore unable to spread the virus to other people. Immunity passports have been considered as a potential future step to manage the pandemic. We probe people's attitudes towards immunity passports and find considerable support overall, although around 20% of the public strongly oppose passports.

摘要

新冠疫情的性质可能要求政府使用侵犯隐私的技术来帮助控制其传播。一种技术是通过移动 Wi-Fi、GPS 和蓝牙进行位置追踪,以便卫生机构监测人们之间的接触情况,从而在有人感染时触发有针对性的社交距离措施。追踪的有效性取决于人们是否愿意支持这种侵犯隐私的措施。我们报告了在疫情高峰期在英国进行的两项大型调查的结果,这些调查探讨了人们对各种追踪技术的态度。结果表明,总体上人们普遍接受位置追踪。当这些措施明确限时,并附有退出条款或其他隐私保证时,接受度会增加。另一种可能用于控制大流行的未来技术涉及“免疫护照”,可以向携带新冠病毒抗体的人发放,这可能意味着他们具有免疫力,因此无法将病毒传播给其他人。免疫护照已被视为管理大流行的潜在未来步骤。我们调查了人们对免疫护照的态度,发现总体上得到了相当多的支持,尽管约有 20%的公众强烈反对护照。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/f5f4a3eb0140/pone.0245740.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/cfcab03910b3/pone.0245740.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/8d64bde58184/pone.0245740.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/052f6fcd8ff5/pone.0245740.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/4972aaa2262f/pone.0245740.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/4c916ecdfde5/pone.0245740.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/7fe55b704c5f/pone.0245740.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/bf4f5f4adf84/pone.0245740.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/bdf8cd2abd2c/pone.0245740.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/f5f4a3eb0140/pone.0245740.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/cfcab03910b3/pone.0245740.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/8d64bde58184/pone.0245740.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/052f6fcd8ff5/pone.0245740.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/4972aaa2262f/pone.0245740.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/4c916ecdfde5/pone.0245740.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/7fe55b704c5f/pone.0245740.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/bf4f5f4adf84/pone.0245740.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/bdf8cd2abd2c/pone.0245740.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d149/7822290/f5f4a3eb0140/pone.0245740.g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Public acceptance of privacy-encroaching policies to address the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom.公众对侵犯隐私的政策的接受程度,以应对英国的 COVID-19 大流行。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245740. eCollection 2021.
2
Contextual Acceptance of COVID-19 Mitigation Mobile Apps in the United States: Mixed Methods Survey Study on Postpandemic Data Privacy.美国 COVID-19 缓解移动应用程序的使用背景:后疫情时代数据隐私的混合方法调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 29;26:e57309. doi: 10.2196/57309.
3
Psychological factors shaping public responses to COVID-19 digital contact tracing technologies in Germany.塑造公众对德国 COVID-19 数字接触追踪技术反应的心理因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 21;11(1):18716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98249-5.
4
Young Adults View Smartphone Tracking Technologies for COVID-19 as Acceptable: The Case of Taiwan.年轻人认为智能手机追踪 COVID-19 技术是可以接受的:以台湾为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1332. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031332.
5
Citizen-Centered Mobile Health Apps Collecting Individual-Level Spatial Data for Infectious Disease Management: Scoping Review.以公民为中心的移动健康应用程序收集传染病管理的个体层面空间数据:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 10;8(11):e22594. doi: 10.2196/22594.
6
The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for COVID-19 in Australia.澳大利亚对用于 COVID-19 的智能手机追踪技术的接受度和采用率。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0244827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244827. eCollection 2021.
7
Motivations for Social Distancing and App Use as Complementary Measures to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic: Quantitative Survey Study.将社交距离和应用程序使用作为对抗新冠疫情补充措施的动机:定量调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 27;22(8):e21613. doi: 10.2196/21613.
8
Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.公众对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的态度:基于英国的焦点小组研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):377-385. doi: 10.1111/hex.13179. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
9
The COVID-19 pandemic and contact tracing technologies, between upholding the right to health and personal data protection.新冠疫情与接触者追踪技术:在维护健康权与个人数据保护之间
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Mar;25(5):2449-2456. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202103_25286.
10
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting digital contact tracing tool adoption during COVID-19 from the perspective of TAM: The role of trust, fear, privacy, anxiety, and social media.从技术接受模型的角度预测COVID-19期间数字接触追踪工具的采用:信任、恐惧、隐私、焦虑和社交媒体的作用。
Digit Health. 2025 May 5;11:20552076251336271. doi: 10.1177/20552076251336271. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Public attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccine mandates and vaccine certificates in Canada: a time series study.加拿大公众对新冠疫苗强制接种和疫苗证书的态度:一项时间序列研究。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Mar 11;82(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01259-8.
3
The Roles of Trust in Government and Sense of Community in the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Privacy Calculus: Mixed Method Study Using a 2-Wave Survey and In-Depth Interviews.

本文引用的文献

1
Belief of having had unconfirmed Covid-19 infection reduces willingness to participate in app-based contact tracing.认为曾感染过未经确诊的新冠病毒会降低参与基于应用程序的接触者追踪的意愿。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Nov 6;3(1):146. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00357-5.
2
The acceptance of Covid-19 tracking technologies: The role of perceived threat, lack of control, and ideological beliefs.对新冠病毒追踪技术的接受度:感知威胁、缺乏控制感及意识形态信念的作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0238973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238973. eCollection 2020.
3
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.
信任政府和社区意识在 COVID-19 接触者追踪隐私计算中的作用:使用两波调查和深入访谈的混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 7;12:e48986. doi: 10.2196/48986.
4
The Moral Foundations of Vaccine Passports.疫苗通行证的道德基础。
J Bus Ethics. 2023 May 21:1-29. doi: 10.1007/s10551-023-05427-8.
5
A privacy calculus model for contact tracing apps: Analyzing the use behavior of the German Corona-Warn-App with a longitudinal user study.用于接触者追踪应用程序的隐私权衡模型:通过纵向用户研究分析德国新冠警示应用程序的使用行为。
Comput Secur. 2023 Sep;132:103338. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2023.103338. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
6
The Impact of Individuals' Social Environments on Contact Tracing App Use: Survey Study.个体社会环境对接触者追踪应用程序使用的影响:调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 May 31;10:e45825. doi: 10.2196/45825.
7
Factors associated with acceptance of a digital contact tracing application for COVID-19 in the Japanese working-age population.与日本劳动年龄人口对 COVID-19 数字接触者追踪应用程序的接受度相关的因素。
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2023 Feb;85(1):59-69. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.85.1.59.
8
Individual Factors Influencing the Public's Perceptions About the Importance of COVID-19 Immunity Certificates in the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional Web-based Questionnaire Survey.影响英国公众对新冠病毒免疫证书重要性认知的个体因素:基于网络的横断面问卷调查
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 27;7:e37139. doi: 10.2196/37139.
9
Impact of Privacy Messaging on COVID-19 Exposure Notification App Downloads: Evidence From a Randomized Experiment.隐私信息对新冠病毒暴露通知应用程序下载量的影响:来自一项随机试验的证据。
AJPM Focus. 2023 Mar;2(1):100059. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100059. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
10
A Study of Users' Privacy Preferences for Data Sharing on Symptoms-Tracking/Health App.一项关于症状追踪/健康应用程序数据共享的用户隐私偏好研究。
Proc ACM Workshop Priv Electron Soc. 2022 Nov;2022:109-113. doi: 10.1145/3559613.3563202. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
基于应用程序的 COVID-19 接触者追踪的可接受性:跨国调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
4
Ethical Implementation of Immunity Passports During the COVID-19 Pandemic.《COVID-19 大流行期间免疫护照的伦理实施》
J Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 4;222(5):715-718. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa352.
5
Ten considerations for effectively managing the COVID-19 transition.有效管理 COVID-19 过渡期的十个注意事项。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jul;4(7):677-687. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0906-x. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
6
Mobile phone data for informing public health actions across the COVID-19 pandemic life cycle.用于在新冠疫情生命周期内为公共卫生行动提供信息的手机数据。
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 5;6(23):eabc0764. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc0764. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
Ten reasons why immunity passports are a bad idea.免疫护照不可行的十个原因。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):379-381. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01451-0.
8
Privileges and Immunity Certification During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的特权与豁免证明
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2243-2244. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7712.
9
The Ethics of COVID-19 Immunity-Based Licenses ("Immunity Passports").基于新冠病毒免疫力的许可(“免疫通行证”)的伦理问题。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2241-2242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8102.
10
Disease Control, Civil Liberties, and Mass Testing - Calibrating Restrictions during the Covid-19 Pandemic.疾病控制、公民自由与大规模检测——新冠疫情期间的限制措施校准
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 9;383(2):102-104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2007637. Epub 2020 Apr 9.