Jiao Lirui, Wachinger Jonas, Dasch Selina, Bärnighausen Till, McMahon Shannon A, Chen Simiao
Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA.
Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
SSM Qual Res Health. 2023 Dec;4:100288. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100288. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
Vaccine hesitancy threatens the response to the COVID-19 pandemic and to other infectious disease outbreaks globally. Fostering trust has been highlighted as a critical factor in addressing vaccine hesitancy and expanding vaccine coverage, but qualitative exploration of trust in the context of vaccination remains limited. We contribute to filling this gap by providing a comprehensive qualitative analysis of trust in the context of COVID-19 vaccination in China. We conducted 40 in-depth interviews with Chinese adults in December 2020. During data collection, trust emerged as a highly salient topic. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and analyzed with a combination of inductive and deductive coding. Following established trust literature, we differentiate between three types of trust - calculation-based trust, knowledge-based trust, and identity-based trust - which we grouped across components of the health system, as informed by the WHO's building blocks. Our results highlight how participants attributed their level of trust in COVID-19 vaccines to their trust in the medical technology itself (based on assessing risks and benefits or previous vaccination experiences), the service delivery and health workforce (informed by past experiences with health providers and their role throughout the pandemic), and leadership and governance (drawing on notions of government performance and patriotism). Reducing negative impact from past vaccine controversies, increasing the credibility of pharmaceutical companies, and fostering clear communication are identified as important channels for facilitating trust. Our findings emphasize a strong need for comprehensive information on COVID-19 vaccines and increased promotion of vaccination by credible figures.
疫苗犹豫威胁着全球对新冠疫情以及其他传染病爆发的应对。培养信任已被视为解决疫苗犹豫问题和扩大疫苗接种覆盖率的关键因素,但在疫苗接种背景下对信任的定性探索仍然有限。我们通过对中国新冠疫苗接种背景下的信任进行全面的定性分析,为填补这一空白做出贡献。2020年12月,我们对中国成年人进行了40次深入访谈。在数据收集过程中,信任成为一个非常突出的话题。访谈进行了录音,逐字转录,翻译成英文,并采用归纳编码和演绎编码相结合的方式进行分析。根据已有的信任文献,我们区分了三种类型的信任——基于算计的信任、基于知识的信任和基于身份的信任——并根据世界卫生组织的构建模块,将它们按照卫生系统的组成部分进行了分类。我们的结果突出了参与者如何将他们对新冠疫苗的信任程度归因于他们对医疗技术本身的信任(基于对风险和益处的评估或以前的接种经历)、服务提供和卫生工作者(基于过去与医疗服务提供者的经历以及他们在整个疫情期间的作用),以及领导和治理(借鉴政府表现和爱国主义的概念)。减少过去疫苗争议的负面影响、提高制药公司的可信度以及促进清晰的沟通被确定为促进信任的重要渠道。我们的研究结果强调了对新冠疫苗全面信息的强烈需求,以及可信人物加大对疫苗接种的推广力度。