Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0273687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273687. eCollection 2022.
Globally, healthcare workers (HCWs) were prioritised for receiving vaccinations against the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Previous research has shown disparities in COVID-19 vaccination uptake among HCWs based on ethnicity, job role, sex, age, and deprivation. However, vaccine attitudes underpinning these variations and factors influencing these attitudes are yet to be fully explored.
We conducted a qualitative study with 164 HCWs from different ethnicities, sexes, job roles, migration statuses, and regions in the United Kingdom (UK). Interviews and focus groups were conducted online or telephonically, and recorded with participants' permission. Recordings were transcribed and a two-pronged analytical approach was adopted: content analysis for categorising vaccine attitudes and thematic analysis for identifying factors influencing vaccine attitudes.
We identified four different COVID-19 vaccine attitudes among HCWs: Active Acceptance, Passive Acceptance, Passive Decline, and Active Decline. Content analysis of the transcripts showed that HCWs from ethnic minority communities and female HCWs were more likely to either decline (actively/passively) or passively accept vaccination-reflecting hesitancy. Factors influencing these attitudes included: trust; risk perception; social influences; access and equity; considerations about the future.
Our data show that attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccine are diverse, and elements of hesitancy may persist even after uptake. This has implications for the sustainability of the COVID-19 vaccine programme, particularly as new components (for example boosters) are being offered. We also found that vaccine attitudes differed by ethnicity, sex and job role, which calls for an intersectional and dynamic approach for improving vaccine uptake among HCWs. Trust, risk perception, social influences, access and equity and future considerations all influence vaccine attitudes and have a bearing on HCWs' decision about accepting or declining the COVID-19 vaccine. Based on our findings, we recommend building trust, addressing structural inequities and, designing inclusive and accessible information to address hesitancy.
在全球范围内,医护人员(HCWs)被优先接种针对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的疫苗。先前的研究表明,医护人员的 COVID-19 疫苗接种率存在差异,这取决于种族、工作角色、性别、年龄和贫困程度。然而,支持这些差异的疫苗态度以及影响这些态度的因素尚未得到充分探索。
我们在英国(UK)进行了一项针对来自不同种族、性别、工作角色、移民身份和地区的 164 名 HCWs 的定性研究。访谈和焦点小组在线或通过电话进行,并在参与者的允许下进行录音。记录被转录,我们采用了两种分析方法:内容分析用于对疫苗态度进行分类,主题分析用于确定影响疫苗态度的因素。
我们在 HCWs 中发现了四种不同的 COVID-19 疫苗态度:积极接受、消极接受、消极拒绝和积极拒绝。对转录本的内容分析表明,来自少数民族社区的 HCWs 和女性 HCWs 更有可能拒绝(积极/消极)或被动接受接种疫苗——这反映了犹豫。影响这些态度的因素包括:信任;风险感知;社会影响;可及性和公平性;对未来的考虑。
我们的数据表明,对 COVID-19 疫苗的态度是多种多样的,即使在接种疫苗后,犹豫的因素可能仍然存在。这对 COVID-19 疫苗接种计划的可持续性产生了影响,特别是因为正在提供新的疫苗(例如加强针)。我们还发现,疫苗态度因种族、性别和工作角色而异,这需要采取交叉和动态的方法来提高 HCWs 的疫苗接种率。信任、风险感知、社会影响、可及性和公平性以及对未来的考虑都会影响疫苗态度,并对 HCWs 接受或拒绝 COVID-19 疫苗的决定产生影响。基于我们的发现,我们建议建立信任、解决结构性不平等问题,并设计包容和可及的信息来解决犹豫情绪。