Yu Fengyun, Jiao Lirui, Chen Qiushi, Wang Qun, De Allegri Manuela, Cao Zhong, Chen Wenjin, Ma Xuedi, Wang Chao, Wachinger Jonas, Jin Zhangfeng, Bunker Aditi, Geldsetzer Pascal, Yang Juntao, Xue Lan, Bärnighausen Till, Chen Simiao
Interdisciplinary Centre for Scientific Computing, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jul 11;4(7):e0003387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003387. eCollection 2024.
Understanding public preferences concerning vaccination is critical to inform pandemic response strategies. To investigate Chinese adults' preferences regarding COVID-19 vaccine attributes, we conducted a cross-sectional online survey in 12,000 Chinese adults in June-July, 2021. Participants were requested to answer a series of discrete choice questions related to hypothetical COVID-19 vaccines. Using mixed logit models, our analysis revealed that participants had a higher preference for COVID-19 vaccines with longer duration of protection (coefficient: 1.272, 95% confidence interval [1.016 to 1.529]) and higher efficacy (coefficient: 1.063, [0.840, 1.287]). Conversely, participants demonstrated a lower preference associated with higher risk of rare but serious side-effects (coefficient: -1.158, [-1.359, -0.958]), oral administration (coefficient: -0.211, [-0.377, -0.046]), more doses (coefficient: -0.148, [-0.296, 0.000]) and imported origin (coefficient: -0.653, [-0.864, -0.443]). Moreover, preferences were heterogeneous by individual factors: highly educated participants were more sensitive to the negative vaccine attributes including price (coefficient -0.312, [-0.370, -0.253]) and imported vaccine (coefficient -0.941, [-1.186, -0.697]); there was also substantial heterogeneity in vaccine preferences with respect to age group, marital status, work status, income, chronic diagnosis history, COVID-19 vaccination history and geographic regions. As the first study of examining the public preferences for COVID-19 vaccine in China with a large nationwide sample of 12,000 adults, our results indicate that future vaccine should pose lower risk, possess longer protection period, have higher efficacy, be domestically produced, and have lower costs to increase the COVID-19 vaccination coverage. Our current study findings from this study provide insights and recommendations for not only COVID-19 vaccine design but also vaccine attribute preferences to increase vaccine uptake in potential future pandemics.
了解公众对疫苗接种的偏好对于制定疫情应对策略至关重要。为了调查中国成年人对新冠疫苗属性的偏好,我们于2021年6月至7月对12000名中国成年人进行了一项横断面在线调查。参与者被要求回答一系列与假设的新冠疫苗相关的离散选择问题。通过混合逻辑模型分析,我们发现参与者对保护期更长(系数:1.272,95%置信区间[1.016至1.529])和效力更高(系数:1.063,[0.840,1.287])的新冠疫苗有更高的偏好。相反,参与者对罕见但严重副作用风险更高(系数:-1.158,[-1.359,-0.958])、口服给药(系数:-0.211,[-0.377,-0.046])、接种剂数更多(系数:-0.148,[-0.296,0.000])以及进口来源(系数:-0.653,[-0.864,-0.443])的疫苗偏好较低。此外,偏好因个体因素而异:高学历参与者对包括价格(系数-0.312,[-0.370,-0.253])和进口疫苗(系数-0.941,[-1.186,-0.697])在内的负面疫苗属性更为敏感;在年龄组、婚姻状况、工作状况、收入、慢性病诊断史、新冠疫苗接种史和地理区域方面,疫苗偏好也存在很大差异。作为第一项在全国范围内对12000名成年人进行大规模抽样调查中国公众对新冠疫苗偏好的研究,我们的结果表明,未来的疫苗应具有更低的风险、更长的保护期、更高的效力、国产且成本更低,以提高新冠疫苗接种覆盖率。我们目前这项研究的结果不仅为新冠疫苗设计,也为疫苗属性偏好提供了见解和建议,以便在未来可能发生的大流行中提高疫苗接种率。