• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“这使护理人员能够首先看到这个人”:在养老院护理中使用即时护理数字管理系统的定性评估。

'It enables the carers to see the person first': Qualitative evaluation of point-of-care digital management system in residential aged care.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Public Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jan;32(1-2):174-190. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16285. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.16285
PMID:35285557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10078649/
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate acceptability, efficiency, and quality of a new digital care management system in a residential aged care home (RACH).

BACKGROUND

Improving care quality and efficiency in RACH, while simultaneously upgrading data management, is a priority for communities and governments.

DESIGN

Participatory action research with mixed methods data collection was employed to evaluate a digital care management system implemented at a 169-bed RACH. This paper reports qualitative findings of the 2-year evaluation.

METHODS

Qualitative data were collected using focus groups with residents, visitors, nurses, managers, care workers, and consultants; resident/visitor and staff hallway interviews and responses to open-ended questions in online staff surveys. Data were analysed thematically under the four predetermined study objectives. Reporting adhered to COREQ guidelines.

RESULTS

325 data captures from 88 participants, over seven data sources were coded. Findings indicate that the system was acceptable to both residents and staff due to perceptions of time-saving and improved quality of care. Increased efficiency was perceived through timeliness as well as reduced time spent retrieving and documenting information. Quality of care was improved through care scheduling individualised to resident needs, with reminders to avoid missed care. Relatives were reassured and activities were scheduled to loved one's preferences. The co-design implementation process was successful through commitment to quality from leadership teams and prioritising the focus on the holistic needs of the residents.

CONCLUSION

A strong emphasis on co-design with care staff in developing and implementing the digital care system contributed to a system that supported nursing and care work, facilitated reporting and documentation, and improved resident care and well-being including identification of missed care.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses, carers, administrators, and advocates can support the co-design creation of information systems that suit the workflow of an organisation and keep the focus on individualised models of care provision.

摘要

目的和目标

评估一个新的数字护理管理系统在养老院中的可接受性、效率和质量。

背景

提高养老院的护理质量和效率,同时升级数据管理,是社区和政府的优先事项。

设计

采用参与式行动研究和混合方法数据收集来评估在一个 169 张床位的养老院实施的数字护理管理系统。本文报告了为期两年的评估中定性研究的结果。

方法

使用焦点小组与居民、访客、护士、经理、护理人员和顾问;居民/访客和工作人员走廊访谈以及在线员工调查中的开放式问题的回复收集定性数据。根据四个预定的研究目标对数据进行主题分析。报告遵循 COREQ 指南。

结果

从七个数据源中对 88 名参与者的 325 个数据点进行了编码。研究结果表明,该系统受到居民和工作人员的欢迎,因为他们认为该系统可以节省时间并提高护理质量。通过及时性以及减少检索和记录信息的时间来提高效率。通过根据居民的需求个性化安排护理计划,并提供提醒以避免遗漏护理,提高了护理质量。亲属得到了安抚,并且根据他们的喜好安排了活动。通过领导层团队对质量的承诺以及对居民整体需求的关注,成功实施了共同设计的实施过程。

结论

在开发和实施数字护理系统时,与护理人员密切合作,强调共同设计,有助于建立一个支持护理和护理工作、促进报告和文档记录以及改善居民护理和幸福感的系统,包括识别遗漏的护理。

临床相关性

护士、护理人员、管理人员和倡导者可以支持共同设计创建适合组织工作流程的信息系统,并始终关注个性化的护理提供模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee5/10078649/f7a26260a107/JOCN-32-174-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee5/10078649/759e5f25bb43/JOCN-32-174-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee5/10078649/f7a26260a107/JOCN-32-174-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee5/10078649/759e5f25bb43/JOCN-32-174-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee5/10078649/f7a26260a107/JOCN-32-174-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
'It enables the carers to see the person first': Qualitative evaluation of point-of-care digital management system in residential aged care.“这使护理人员能够首先看到这个人”:在养老院护理中使用即时护理数字管理系统的定性评估。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jan;32(1-2):174-190. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16285. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
2
A co-designed health information system implementation into residential aged care: A mixed-method evaluation.共同设计的健康信息系统在老年住宅护理中的实施:一项混合方法评估。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Mar;55(2):521-535. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12840. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
3
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
4
5
Nursing home staff's perceptions of barriers and needs in implementing person-centred care for people living with dementia: A qualitative study.养老院工作人员对实施以痴呆患者为中心的护理的障碍和需求的看法:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jul;31(13-14):1896-1906. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15729. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
6
Adjusting to life in a residential aged care facility: Perspectives of people with dementia, family members and facility care staff.适应养老院的生活:痴呆症患者、家庭成员和养老院工作人员的观点。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Nov;28(21-22):3901-3913. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14978. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
7
Australian residential aged care home staff experiences of implementing an intervention to improve palliative and end-of-life care for residents: A qualitative study.澳大利亚养老院工作人员实施改善患者姑息治疗和临终关怀干预措施的体验:一项定性研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5588-e5601. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13984. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
8
Towards successful digital transformation through co-creation: a longitudinal study of a four-year implementation of digital monitoring technology in residential care for persons with dementia.通过共创实现成功的数字化转型:一项对痴呆症患者居家护理中数字监测技术四年实施情况的纵向研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 10;19(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4191-1.
9
10
Implementing the Namaste Care Program for residents with advanced dementia: exploring the perceptions of families and staff in UK care homes.为晚期痴呆症患者实施合十礼关怀计划:探索英国养老院中家属和工作人员的看法。
Ann Palliat Med. 2017 Oct;6(4):327-339. doi: 10.21037/apm.2017.06.26.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a comprehensive model of home-based long-term care for older people in Iran: a multi-method study.构建伊朗老年人居家长期照护综合模型:一项多方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 22;25(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12434-0.
2
Best Practices for Implementing Electronic Care Records in Adult Social Care: Rapid Scoping Review.在成人社会护理中实施电子护理记录的最佳实践:快速范围审查。
JMIR Aging. 2025 Feb 14;8:e60107. doi: 10.2196/60107.
3
Using co-design to understand consumer's health information-seeking behaviours and design preferences for a new digital clinical dashboard in aged care.

本文引用的文献

1
Putting the social back into sociotechnical: Case studies of co-design in digital health.将社会放回社会技术中:数字健康共同设计的案例研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Feb 15;28(2):284-293. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa197.
2
Implementation pilot of a novel electronic bedside nursing chart: a mixed-methods case study.一种新型电子床边护理图表的实施试点:一项混合方法的案例研究
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Sep;44(5):672-676. doi: 10.1071/AH18231.
3
Who uses residential aged care now, how has it changed and what does it mean for the future?现在谁在使用养老院?它是如何变化的?这对未来意味着什么?
运用协同设计来了解消费者在老年护理中寻求健康信息的行为以及对新型数字临床仪表盘的设计偏好。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):993. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05581-2.
4
Participation in the digital transformation of healthcare: a review of qualitative studies.参与医疗保健的数字化转型:定性研究综述。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2024 Nov 15;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):68-84. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2024-0021.
5
Aspiration pneumonia in nursing literature-a mapping review.护理文献中的吸入性肺炎——一项图谱综述
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jul 24;5:1393368. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1393368. eCollection 2024.
6
Care quality and safety in long-term aged care settings: A systematic review and narrative analysis of missed care measurements.长期老年护理机构中的护理质量与安全:对护理缺失测量的系统评价与叙述性分析
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Sep;81(9):5264-5290. doi: 10.1111/jan.16358. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
7
Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review.老年护理中临床仪表板的可用性与可接受性:系统评价
JMIR Aging. 2023 Jun 19;6:e42274. doi: 10.2196/42274.
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Dec;44(6):820-828. doi: 10.1071/AH20040.
4
Developing hierarchical standardized home care nursing statements using nursing standard terminologies.运用护理标准术语制定层级式规范化居家护理护理语句。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Sep;141:104227. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104227. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
5
Staff perspectives on the usability of electronic patient records for planning and delivering dementia care in nursing homes: a multiple case study.工作人员对电子病历在养老院规划和提供痴呆症护理的可用性的看法:一项多案例研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01160-8.
6
The contribution of electronic health records to risk management through accreditation of residential aged care homes in Australia.电子健康记录对澳大利亚养老院认证风险管理的贡献。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Mar 20;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1070-y.
7
Delivering person-centered care with an electronic health record.提供以电子健康记录为基础的以患者为中心的护理。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0897-6.
8
Digital technology and nursing care: a scoping review on acceptance, effectiveness and efficiency studies of informal and formal care technologies.数字技术与护理:非正式和正式护理技术的接受度、有效性和效率研究的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 20;19(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4238-3.
9
Using the framework approach to analyse qualitative data: a worked example.运用框架法分析定性数据:一个实例
Nurse Res. 2019 Sep 21;26(2):8-13. doi: 10.7748/nr.2018.e1580. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
10
Nursing Home Implementation of Health Information Technology: Review of the Literature Finds Inadequate Investment in Preparation, Infrastructure, and Training.养老院健康信息技术的实施:文献综述发现准备工作、基础设施和培训方面投资不足。
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018778902. doi: 10.1177/0046958018778902.