Kohn A N, Moss A P, Hargett N A, Ritch R, Smith H, Podos S M
Am J Ophthalmol. 1979 Feb;87(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90142-9.
Dipivalyl epinephrine, 0.1%, though slightly less effective in decreasing intraocular pressure, showed significantly fewer side effects than epinephrine hydrochloride, 2%. Seventeen patients with symmetrically increased intraocular pressures who completed a six-month double-masked crossover study showed a significant decrease in intraocular pressure averaging 23.7% for dipivalyl epinephrine over the entire study and 27.4% for epinephrine. In the first treatment period, dipivalyl epinephrine was slightly less effective than epinephrine. In the second treatment period, dipivalyl epinephrine was statistically less effective than epinephrine. Two of the original 25 patients were dropped from the study because of epinephrine allergy or intolerance, one had uncontrolled pressures with either drug, and five failed to maintain adequate follow-up. Complaints of side effects such as burning and irritation occurred much more frequently in eyes receiving epinephrine (24%) than dipivalyl epinephrine (3%). Mild mydriasis occurred with each drug, averaging +0.65 mm with dipivalyl epinephrine and +0.55 mm Hg with epinephrine. No effect on blood pressure or pulse rate was found for the two drugs.
0.1%的双特戊酰肾上腺素在降低眼压方面效果稍逊,但与2%的盐酸肾上腺素相比,副作用明显更少。17名眼压对称性升高的患者完成了一项为期六个月的双盲交叉研究,结果显示,在整个研究过程中,双特戊酰肾上腺素使眼压显著降低,平均降幅为23.7%,而肾上腺素为27.4%。在第一个治疗期,双特戊酰肾上腺素的效果略逊于肾上腺素。在第二个治疗期,双特戊酰肾上腺素在统计学上效果不如肾上腺素。最初的25名患者中有2名因对肾上腺素过敏或不耐受而退出研究,1名患者使用任何一种药物眼压均无法控制,5名患者未能维持足够的随访。接受肾上腺素治疗的眼睛出现烧灼感和刺激感等副作用的投诉(24%)比接受双特戊酰肾上腺素治疗的眼睛(3%)更为频繁。两种药物均出现轻度散瞳,双特戊酰肾上腺素平均为+0.65毫米汞柱,肾上腺素为+0.55毫米汞柱。未发现两种药物对血压或脉搏率有影响。