Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jul;329:116022. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116022. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
Worldwide, colorectal cancer is a major public health issue. Despite the existence of screening programmes in many countries, global uptake remains low. This meta-ethnography aimed to analyse qualitative literature to explore attitudes towards colorectal cancer screening and reasons for non-participation in eligible people that do not participate when invited.
Systematic searches were conducted in five databases in May 2021. Critical appraisal of included studies was performed using the CASP checklist for qualitative studies.
Thirteen studies were included. Three main themes and eight sub-themes were developed across studies: (1) Differences in motivation, with non-participants expressing a lack of knowledge and varying levels of intention to participate but not feeling screening was personally necessary; (2) Active aversion to screening expressed by fear, discomfort, disgust or not wanting to know; and (3) Contextual barriers of the healthcare system such as practical constraints or poor relationships with healthcare professionals.
Findings suggest multiple pathways to non-participation including ambivalence, aversion to the process and consequences of screening or lack of support. Persuasive messages and prompts to action to target ambivalence, reassurance regarding the screening procedures to target negative reactions, and increased support from healthcare professionals may be beneficial in increasing screening uptake.
在全球范围内,结直肠癌是一个主要的公共卫生问题。尽管许多国家都有筛查计划,但全球参与率仍然很低。本元分析旨在分析定性文献,以探讨有资格但未参与邀请的人对结直肠癌筛查的态度和不参与的原因。
2021 年 5 月在五个数据库中进行了系统检索。使用 CASP 定性研究检查表对纳入的研究进行了批判性评估。
纳入了 13 项研究。通过研究,得出了三个主要主题和八个子主题:(1)动机差异,不参与者表示缺乏知识,参与意向程度不同,但不认为筛查是个人必要的;(2)对筛查的积极回避,表现为恐惧、不适、厌恶或不想知道;(3)医疗保健系统的实际限制或与医疗保健专业人员关系不佳等方面的障碍。
研究结果表明,不参与的原因包括犹豫不决、对筛查过程和后果的厌恶或缺乏支持等多种途径。针对犹豫不决的有说服力的信息和行动提示、对筛查程序的保证以应对负面反应,以及增加医疗保健专业人员的支持,可能有助于提高筛查率。