• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在国家公园中,谁的环保行为更突出:游客和徒步旅行者的比较。

Who behaves more pro-environmental in the national parks: A comparison of the tourist and the hiker.

机构信息

School of Tourism, Wuyi University, Nanping, China.

Graduate School of Business, SEGi University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287227. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0287227
PMID:37352245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10289389/
Abstract

The intention of pro-environmental behavior (PEB) directly affects the sustainable development of protected areas, especially national parks, but few studies have done comparative research on tourist and hiker behaviors. This study explores the intention of tourists' and hikers' pro-environmental behavior based on theory of planned behavior (TPB) and norm activation theory (NAM). Researchers surveyed 454 tourists and 466 hikers in Wuyishan National Park a structural equation modeling data analysis method. The results demonstrate that the TPB and the NAM were accurate in describing for tourists' and hikers' pro-environmental behavior in national park. However, for specific influencing factors, hikers' attitude, awareness of consequences, and assumption of responsibility were significantly different from those of the tourists. This study sheds light on how to better comprehend and advocate for PEB in national parks and proposes different management approaches to improve the PEB of tourists and hikers.

摘要

亲环境行为(PEB)的意图直接影响保护区的可持续发展,特别是国家公园,但很少有研究对游客和徒步旅行者的行为进行比较研究。本研究基于计划行为理论(TPB)和规范激活理论(NAM),探讨了游客和徒步旅行者的亲环境行为意图。研究人员在武夷山国家公园对 454 名游客和 466 名徒步旅行者进行了调查,采用结构方程模型进行数据分析。结果表明,TPB 和 NAM 准确地描述了国家公园内游客和徒步旅行者的亲环境行为。然而,对于具体的影响因素,徒步旅行者的态度、后果意识和责任感与游客有显著差异。本研究有助于更好地理解和倡导国家公园内的亲环境行为,并提出了不同的管理方法,以提高游客和徒步旅行者的亲环境行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3193/10289389/f2d65e9fccf5/pone.0287227.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3193/10289389/f2d65e9fccf5/pone.0287227.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3193/10289389/f2d65e9fccf5/pone.0287227.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Who behaves more pro-environmental in the national parks: A comparison of the tourist and the hiker.在国家公园中,谁的环保行为更突出:游客和徒步旅行者的比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287227. eCollection 2023.
2
What influences tourists' intention to participate in the Zero Litter Initiative in mountainous tourism areas: A case study of Huangshan National Park, China.是什么影响了游客参与山区旅游区零垃圾倡议的意愿:以黄山国家公园为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 20;657:1127-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.114. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
3
Impact of Situational Environmental Education on Tourist Behavior-A Case Study of Water Culture Ecological Park in China.情境式环境教育对游客行为的影响——以中国水文化生态公园为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 9;19(18):11388. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811388.
4
Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework: Is the Perceived Outstanding Universal Value Attractiveness of Tourists Beneficial to World Heritage Site Conservation?刺激-生物-反应框架:游客感知的突出普遍价值吸引力是否有利于世界遗产地的保护?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;20(2):1189. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021189.
5
The influence of environmental background on tourists' environmentally responsible behaviour.环境背景对游客环境责任行为的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 1;231:804-810. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.089. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
6
The impact of behavioral reference on tourists' responsible environmental behaviors.行为参照对游客负责任的环境行为的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 1;694:133698. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133698. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
7
Factors influencing tourists' litter management behavior in mountainous tourism areas in China.影响中国山区旅游区游客垃圾管理行为的因素。
Waste Manag. 2018 Sep;79:273-286. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.047. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
8
A comparative study of environmental responsibility behavior in ecotourism from the perceptions of residents and tourists: A case of Qilian Mountains National Park in China.中国祁连山国家公园居民和游客环境责任行为感知的比较研究:以生态旅游为例。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0281119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281119. eCollection 2023.
9
Investigating tourists' intention toward green hotels in Malaysia: a direction on tourist sustainable consumption.调查马来西亚游客对绿色酒店的意向:旅游可持续消费的一个方向。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):38500-38511. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24946-x. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
10
Does a National Park Enhance the Environment-Friendliness of Tourists as an Ecotourism Destination?国家公园是否会提升游客对生态旅游目的地的环保意识?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 6;18(16):8321. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168321.

引用本文的文献

1
Biocultural tourist experience in Romania's High Nature Value rural landscape: Application of an extended Theory of Planned Behavior.罗马尼亚高自然价值乡村景观中的生物文化旅游体验:计划行为扩展理论的应用
PLoS One. 2025 May 20;20(5):e0324444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324444. eCollection 2025.
2
Public network attention to hiking in China and its influencing factors.公众对中国徒步旅行的关注及其影响因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0306726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306726. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the Influence of Initial Values of College Students in Shaping Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention.理解大学生初始值对形成亲环境行为意向的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 7;19(15):9730. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159730.
2
An Integrative Model of Tourists' Pro-Environmental Behavior Based on the Dual Path of Rational Planning and Embodied Emotion.基于理性规划和具身情感双重路径的游客环保行为综合模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 28;19(13):7910. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137910.
3
Examining young Chinese consumers' engagement in restaurant food waste mitigation from the perspective of cultural values and information publicity.
从文化价值观和信息宣传角度审视中国年轻消费者在减少餐厅食物浪费方面的参与情况。
Appetite. 2022 Aug 1;175:106021. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106021. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
4
A multilevel analysis of ''Leave No Litter" (LNL) intention of Hong Kong hikers.香港远足者“不留垃圾”(LNL)意愿的多层次分析。
Waste Manag. 2022 Jan 1;137:158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
Investigating factors influencing tourists' environmentally responsible behavior with extended theory of planned behavior for coastal tourism in Thailand.调查影响游客在泰国沿海旅游中具有环境责任感行为的因素——扩展计划行为理论。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Aug;169:112507. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112507. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
How important is community participation to eco-environmental conservation in protected areas? From the perspective of predicting locals' pro-environmental behaviours.社区参与对保护区的生态环境保护有多重要?从预测当地人的环保行为的角度来看。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 15;739:139889. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139889. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
7
Drivers of farmers' intention to use integrated pest management: Integrating theory of planned behavior and norm activation model.农民使用病虫害综合防治意愿的驱动因素:计划行为理论与规范激活模型的整合。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Apr 15;236:328-339. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.097. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
8
What influences tourists' intention to participate in the Zero Litter Initiative in mountainous tourism areas: A case study of Huangshan National Park, China.是什么影响了游客参与山区旅游区零垃圾倡议的意愿:以黄山国家公园为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 20;657:1127-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.114. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
9
The influence of environmental background on tourists' environmentally responsible behaviour.环境背景对游客环境责任行为的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 1;231:804-810. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.089. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
10
Factors influencing tourists' litter management behavior in mountainous tourism areas in China.影响中国山区旅游区游客垃圾管理行为的因素。
Waste Manag. 2018 Sep;79:273-286. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.047. Epub 2018 Aug 3.