• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Identification and evaluation of criterion measurement methods.标准测量方法的识别与评估。
Mil Psychol. 2023 Jul-Aug;35(4):308-320. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2050165. Epub 2022 May 31.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Development of cross-service training and job performance criterion measures for the U.S. Military.为美国军队制定跨服务培训和工作绩效标准措施。
Mil Psychol. 2023 Jul-Aug;35(4):321-334. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2023.2175542. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
4
Refinement and Validation of the Empowerment Audiology Questionnaire: Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Evaluation.赋权听力学问卷的修订与验证:Rasch 分析与传统心理计量学评估。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(3):583-599. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001449. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
5
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.关于支持电子和纸质患者报告结局(PRO)测量等效性所需证据的建议:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)电子PRO良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
6
Administrative records-based criterion measures.基于管理记录的标准测量。
Mil Psychol. 2023 Jul-Aug;35(4):351-363. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2063614. Epub 2022 May 31.
7
Evidence on psychometric properties of self-report questionnaires in evaluating blended learning in health sciences university students: research protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.评估健康科学大学生混合式学习的自我报告问卷的心理测量特性的证据:系统评价和荟萃分析的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 17;14(8):e075266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075266.
8
Psychometric Assessment of the Physicians' Job Demands and Resources Scale.医生工作要求与资源量表的心理评估。
Eval Health Prof. 2023 Dec;46(4):384-395. doi: 10.1177/01632787231195077. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
9
A brief psychometric and clinimetric evaluation of self-report burden and mental health measures completed by care partners of people with Parkinson's-related dementia.对帕金森病相关痴呆患者的照顾者完成的自我报告负担和心理健康测量的简要心理计量学和临床评估。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Jul;32(7):875-880. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220000605.
10
Measurement properties of self-report questionnaires on health-related quality of life and functional health status in dysphonia: a systematic review using the COSMIN taxonomy.健康相关生活质量和功能性健康状况自评问卷在发声障碍中的测量特性:使用 COSMIN 分类学的系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Feb;28(2):283-296. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2001-6. Epub 2018 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comments on the articles dealing with individual performance criteria that are included in this special issue of .本特刊中所包含的针对个体绩效标准的文章的评论。
Mil Psychol. 2023 Jul-Aug;35(4):372-375. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2023.2218259.
2
Commentary on the criterion problem in the US Department of Defense: Policy and operational considerations.美国国防部标准问题述评:政策与操作层面的考虑
Mil Psychol. 2023 Jul-Aug;35(4):364-371. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2023.2218787.
3
Administrative records-based criterion measures.基于管理记录的标准测量。
Mil Psychol. 2023 Jul-Aug;35(4):351-363. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2063614. Epub 2022 May 31.
4
Introduction to the special issue on criterion measurement.专题介绍:准则测量
Mil Psychol. 2023 Jul-Aug;35(4):273-282. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2050158.

本文引用的文献

1
Attrition and reenlistment in the Army: Using the Tailored Adaptive Personality Assessment System (TAPAS) to improve retention.陆军中的人员流失与再次入伍:运用定制化适应性人格评估系统(TAPAS)提高留用率
Mil Psychol. 2020 Feb 4;32(1):36-50. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652487. eCollection 2020.
2
Development of a performance taxonomy for entry-level military occupations.开发入门级军事职业绩效分类法。
Mil Psychol. 2023 Jul-Aug;35(4):283-294. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2050163. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
3
Defining occupation-specific performance components for military selection and classification.定义军事选拔和分类的特定职业绩效组成部分。
Mil Psychol. 2023 Jul-Aug;35(4):295-307. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2065901. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
4
Administrative records-based criterion measures.基于管理记录的标准测量。
Mil Psychol. 2023 Jul-Aug;35(4):351-363. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2063614. Epub 2022 May 31.
5
Introduction to the special issue on criterion measurement.专题介绍:准则测量
Mil Psychol. 2023 Jul-Aug;35(4):273-282. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2050158.
6
A review of the content, criterion-related, and construct-related validity of assessment center exercises.评估中心练习的内容、效标关联和构想关联效度的回顾。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1143-68. doi: 10.1037/a0038707. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
7
Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: a meta-analytic test of a process model.工作绩效评估中的自我与他人评价一致性:过程模型的元分析检验
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Mar;94(2):353-70. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.94.2.353.
8
The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice.在人员选拔研究与实践中比较预测指标时,区分构念与方法的重要性。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Mar;93(2):435-42. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.435.
9
Improved military air traffic controller selection methods as measured by subsequent training performance.通过后续训练表现衡量的改进后的军事空中交通管制员选拔方法。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2008 Jan;79(1):36-43. doi: 10.3357/asem.2166.2008.
10
Working hard and working smart: motivation and ability during typical and maximum performance.努力工作与明智工作:典型表现和最佳表现中的动机与能力
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jul;92(4):978-92. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.978.

标准测量方法的识别与评估。

Identification and evaluation of criterion measurement methods.

机构信息

Human Resources Research Organization, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.

Independent, Roseville, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Mil Psychol. 2023 Jul-Aug;35(4):308-320. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2050165. Epub 2022 May 31.

DOI:10.1080/08995605.2022.2050165
PMID:37352453
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10291913/
Abstract

Criterion measures vary greatly in terms of their psychometric quality and ease of use. This paper serves two purposes. First, it provides a general summary of different approaches to criterion measurement in a military context. Second, it provides an extensive review of 16 specific types of criterion measurement methods (e.g., job performance rating scales, self-report questionnaires, job knowledge tests) on nine psychometric and ease-of-use evaluation factors. Eight criterion measurement experts read a summary of extant research and made ratings to evaluate each measurement method on the evaluation factors. Rater intra-class correlations (ICCs) were high, ranging from .75 to .95 across the evaluation dimensions with a median of .91. Data showed a quality-feasibility tradeoff, where criterion data that are easy to obtain often have technical flaws. Recommendations for military services and future directions in criterion measurement (e.g., applications of machine learning) are discussed.

摘要

标准测量方法在心理计量学质量和易用性方面差异很大。本文有两个目的。首先,它提供了一个军事背景下标准测量的不同方法的一般总结。其次,它对 16 种特定类型的标准测量方法(例如,工作绩效评定量表、自我报告问卷、工作知识测试)进行了广泛的回顾,涉及九个心理计量学和易用性评估因素。八位标准测量专家阅读了现有研究的摘要,并对每个评估因素的测量方法进行了评分。评分者组内相关系数(ICC)较高,在评估维度上的范围从.75 到.95,中位数为.91。数据显示了质量-可行性的权衡,即易于获得的标准数据通常存在技术缺陷。讨论了对军事部门的建议和标准测量的未来方向(例如,机器学习的应用)。