• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validation of the CogDrisk Instrument as Predictive of Dementia in Four General Community-Dwelling Populations.CogDrisk 工具在四个一般社区居住人群中预测痴呆的验证。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(3):478-487. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2023.38.
2
CogDrisk, ANU-ADRI, CAIDE, and LIBRA Risk Scores for Estimating Dementia Risk.CogDrisk、ANU-ADRI、CAIDE 和 LIBRA 风险评分用于估计痴呆风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2331460. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31460.
3
Plasma proteomics for risk prediction of Alzheimer's disease in the general population.普通人群中用于阿尔茨海默病风险预测的血浆蛋白质组学
Aging Cell. 2024 Dec;23(12):e14330. doi: 10.1111/acel.14330. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
4
A self-report risk index to predict occurrence of dementia in three independent cohorts of older adults: the ANU-ADRI.一种用于预测三个独立老年人群队列中痴呆症发生情况的自我报告风险指数:澳大利亚国立大学衰老与痴呆风险指数(ANU-ADRI)。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 23;9(1):e86141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086141. eCollection 2014.
5
Derivation and validation of the Rapid Assessment of Dementia Risk (RADaR) for older adults.用于老年人的痴呆风险快速评估(RADaR)的推导和验证。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 17;17(3):e0265379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265379. eCollection 2022.
6
Development of a novel dementia risk prediction model in the general population: A large, longitudinal, population-based machine-learning study.普通人群中新型痴呆风险预测模型的开发:一项基于人群的大型纵向机器学习研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Sep 23;53:101665. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101665. eCollection 2022 Nov.
7
Accurate prediction of histologically confirmed Alzheimer's disease and the differential diagnosis of dementia: the use of NINCDS-ADRDA and DSM-III-R criteria, SPECT, X-ray CT, and APO E4 medial temporal lobe dementias. The Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Aging.组织学确诊的阿尔茨海默病的准确预测及痴呆的鉴别诊断:采用NINCDS - ADRDA和DSM - III - R标准、单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)、X线计算机断层扫描(X-ray CT)以及载脂蛋白E4(APO E4)与内侧颞叶痴呆。牛津记忆与衰老研究项目。
Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9 Suppl 1:191-222; discussion 247-52.
8
Development of the CogDrisk tool to assess risk factors for dementia.用于评估痴呆症风险因素的CogDrisk工具的开发。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2022 Jul 12;14(1):e12336. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12336. eCollection 2022.
9
Accurate prediction of histologically confirmed Alzheimer's disease and the differential diagnosis of dementia: the use of NINCDS-ADRDA and DSM-III-R criteria, SPECT, X-ray CT, and Apo E4 in medial temporal lobe dementias. Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Aging.经组织学确诊的阿尔茨海默病的准确预测及痴呆的鉴别诊断:NINCDS-ADRDA和DSM-III-R标准、单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)、X线计算机断层扫描(CT)以及载脂蛋白E4(Apo E4)在内侧颞叶痴呆中的应用。牛津记忆与衰老研究项目。
Int Psychogeriatr. 1998 Sep;10(3):271-302. doi: 10.1017/s1041610298005389.
10
Dementia and Alzheimer disease incidence: a prospective cohort study.痴呆症与阿尔茨海默病发病率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Arch Neurol. 2002 Nov;59(11):1737-46. doi: 10.1001/archneur.59.11.1737.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurophysiological correlates of modifiable dementia risk factors in cognitively unimpaired older adults.认知未受损的老年人中可改变的痴呆风险因素的神经生理学关联
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Aug 1;35(8). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf179.
2
Development of a midlife-specific CogDrisk algorithm (CogDrisk-ML) to enable validated implementation of dementia risk assessment from midlife to late life.开发一种针对中年人群的认知风险算法(CogDrisk-ML),以实现从中年到老年阶段经过验证的痴呆症风险评估。
Age Ageing. 2025 Jul 1;54(7). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf201.
3
Development and Concurrent Validity of the Short-Form CogDrisk Dementia Risk Assessment Tool.短式认知风险评估工具(CogDrisk)的编制及其同时效度验证。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11(6):1751-1758. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.108.
4
Modifiable dementia risk associated with smaller white matter volume and altered 1/f aperiodic brain activity: cross-sectional insights from the LEISURE study.与较小的白质体积和改变的 1/f 无周期脑活动相关的可改变性痴呆风险:来自 LEISURE 研究的横断面见解。
Age Ageing. 2024 Nov 4;53(11). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae243.
5
CogDrisk, ANU-ADRI, CAIDE, and LIBRA Risk Scores for Estimating Dementia Risk.CogDrisk、ANU-ADRI、CAIDE 和 LIBRA 风险评分用于估计痴呆风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2331460. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31460.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction Abilities of SCORE2 Risk Algorithms for Incident Dementia and All-Cause Mortality: Results From the UK Biobank Cohort Study.SCORE2风险算法对新发痴呆症和全因死亡率的预测能力:英国生物银行队列研究结果
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023 Mar 30;78(4):704-710. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glac251.
2
Development of a novel dementia risk prediction model in the general population: A large, longitudinal, population-based machine-learning study.普通人群中新型痴呆风险预测模型的开发:一项基于人群的大型纵向机器学习研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Sep 23;53:101665. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101665. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Development of the CogDrisk tool to assess risk factors for dementia.用于评估痴呆症风险因素的CogDrisk工具的开发。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2022 Jul 12;14(1):e12336. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12336. eCollection 2022.
4
Derivation and validation of the Rapid Assessment of Dementia Risk (RADaR) for older adults.用于老年人的痴呆风险快速评估(RADaR)的推导和验证。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 17;17(3):e0265379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265379. eCollection 2022.
5
Evidence-based prevention of Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of 243 observational prospective studies and 153 randomised controlled trials.基于证据的阿尔茨海默病预防:243 项观察性前瞻性研究和 153 项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Nov;91(11):1201-1209. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321913. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
6
A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses that Evaluate Risk Factors for Dementia to Evaluate the Quantity, Quality, and Global Representativeness of Evidence.一项系统评价荟萃分析评估痴呆风险因素的研究,以评估证据的数量、质量和全球代表性。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70(s1):S165-S186. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190181.
7
A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies.纵向研究中缺失数据的多种插补方法比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0615-6.
8
Models for predicting risk of dementia: a systematic review.预测痴呆风险的模型:系统综述。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;90(4):373-379. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318212. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
9
Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project.宗教秩序研究和冲刺记忆与衰老项目。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(s1):S161-S189. doi: 10.3233/JAD-179939.
10
External validation of four dementia prediction models for use in the general community-dwelling population: a comparative analysis from the Rotterdam Study.四项痴呆预测模型在一般社区居住人群中应用的外部验证:来自鹿特丹研究的对比分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Jul;33(7):645-655. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0403-y. Epub 2018 May 8.

CogDrisk 工具在四个一般社区居住人群中预测痴呆的验证。

Validation of the CogDrisk Instrument as Predictive of Dementia in Four General Community-Dwelling Populations.

机构信息

Scientia Professor Kaarin J. Anstey, School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Kensington NSW 2052, Australia, Telephone no: +61 9399 1061, Email:

出版信息

J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(3):478-487. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2023.38.

DOI:10.14283/jpad.2023.38
PMID:37357288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10449369/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lack of external validation of dementia risk tools is a major limitation for generalizability and translatability of prediction scores in clinical practice and research.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to validate a new dementia prediction risk tool called CogDrisk and a version, CogDrisk-AD for predicting Alzheimer's disease (AD) using cohort studies.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Four cohort studies were identified that included majority of the dementia risk factors from the CogDrisk tool. Participants who were free of dementia at baseline were included. The predictors were component variables in the CogDrisk tool that include self-reported demographics, medical risk factors and lifestyle habits. Risk scores for Any Dementia and AD were computed and Area Under the Curve (AUC) was assessed. To examine modifiable risk factors for dementia, the CogDrisk tool was tested by excluding age and sex estimates from the model.

RESULTS

The performance of the tool varied between studies. The overall AUC and 95% CI for predicting dementia was 0.77 (0.57, 0.97) for the Swedish National study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen, 0.76 (0.70, 0.83) for the Health and Retirement Study - Aging, Demographics and Memory Study, 0.70 (0.67,0.72) for the Cardiovascular Health Study Cognition Study, and 0.66 (0.62,0.70) for the Rush Memory and Aging Project.

CONCLUSIONS

The CogDrisk and CogDrisk-AD performed well in the four studies. Overall, this tool can be used to assess individualized risk factors of dementia and AD in various population settings.

摘要

背景

痴呆风险工具缺乏外部验证是其在临床实践和研究中的推广和可翻译性的主要限制。

目的

我们旨在使用队列研究验证一种新的痴呆预测风险工具,称为 CogDrisk,以及用于预测阿尔茨海默病(AD)的版本 CogDrisk-AD。

设计、地点、参与者和测量:确定了四项队列研究,这些研究包含了 CogDrisk 工具中的大多数痴呆风险因素。基线时无痴呆的参与者被纳入研究。预测因子是 CogDrisk 工具中的组成变量,包括自我报告的人口统计学、医疗风险因素和生活方式习惯。计算了任何痴呆和 AD 的风险评分,并评估了曲线下面积(AUC)。为了研究可改变的痴呆风险因素,通过从模型中排除年龄和性别估计,测试了 CogDrisk 工具。

结果

该工具在不同的研究中的表现有所不同。总体而言,瑞典国家老龄化和 Kungsholmen 护理研究的 AUC 和 95%CI 为 0.77(0.57,0.97),健康与退休研究-老龄化、人口统计学和记忆研究的 AUC 和 95%CI 为 0.76(0.70,0.83),心血管健康研究认知研究的 AUC 和 95%CI 为 0.70(0.67,0.72),拉什记忆和衰老项目的 AUC 和 95%CI 为 0.66(0.62,0.70)。

结论

CogDrisk 和 CogDrisk-AD 在四项研究中表现良好。总的来说,该工具可用于评估各种人群中痴呆和 AD 的个体风险因素。