Litofcenko Julia, Meyer Michael, Neumayr Michaela, Pennerstorfer Astrid
Institute for Nonprofit Management, WU Vienna, University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria.
Institute for Social Policy, WU Vienna, University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria.
Voluntas. 2023 Feb 28:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11266-023-00558-y.
Why did some individuals react to the Covid-19 crisis in a prosocial manner, whereas others withdrew from society? To shed light onto this question, we investigate changing patterns of charitable giving during the pandemic. The study analyzes survey data of 2000 individuals, representative of the populations of Germany and Austria. Logistic regressions reveal that personal affectedness by Covid-19 seems to play a crucial role: those who were personally affected either mentally, financially, or health-wise during the first 12 months of Covid-19 were most likely to have changed their giving behavior. The observed patterns fit psychological explanations of how human beings process existential threats. Our findings indicate that a profound societal crisis in itself mainly leads to changes in charitable giving if individuals are severely affected on a personal level. Thereby, we contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying individuals' charitable giving behavior in times of crisis.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11266-023-00558-y.
为什么有些人以亲社会的方式应对新冠疫情危机,而另一些人却脱离社会?为了阐明这个问题,我们调查了疫情期间慈善捐赠模式的变化。该研究分析了代表德国和奥地利人口的2000名个体的调查数据。逻辑回归显示,新冠疫情对个人的影响似乎起着关键作用:在新冠疫情的头12个月里,那些在心理、经济或健康方面受到个人影响的人最有可能改变他们的捐赠行为。观察到的模式符合关于人类如何应对生存威胁的心理学解释。我们的研究结果表明,如果个人在个人层面受到严重影响,深刻的社会危机本身主要会导致慈善捐赠的变化。由此,我们有助于更好地理解危机时期个人慈善捐赠行为背后的机制。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11266-023-00558-y获取的补充材料。