• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单侧与双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗伴有脊柱侧凸的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较。

Comparison of unilateral and bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures associated with scoliosis.

作者信息

Liu Zixiang, Li Hanwen, Tang Yingchuang, Liu Hao, Zhang Junxin, Zou Jun, Zhang Kai, Chen Kangwu

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, P.R. China.

出版信息

Exp Ther Med. 2023 May 22;26(1):335. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.12034. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.3892/etm.2023.12034
PMID:37383374
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10294595/
Abstract

To assess the clinical and radiographic effectiveness of unilateral and bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) associated with scoliosis, 52 patients with OVCF associated with scoliosis who underwent PKP were retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into the unilateral PKP group (n=26) and the bilateral PKP group (n=26). The operation time, bone cement injection volume and frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy were recorded and compared between the groups. Additionally, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, as well as postoperative complications, including bone cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fractures, were also assessed. The operation time, bone cement injection volume and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency were significantly lower in the unilateral compared with the bilateral group (P<0.001). The VAS score, ODI score, average vertebral body height and kyphotic angle (KA) were improved after surgery in each group with no difference in these clinical parameters between the two groups both before and after surgery. Furthermore, the proportion of cases with bone cement leakage in the unilateral group was significantly lower compared with that in the bilateral group (P<0.05). During the follow-up, there were three cases (11.5%) in the unilateral group and two cases (7.7%) in the bilateral group who suffered adjacent vertebral fractures, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). For treating patients with OVCF accompanied by scoliosis, both unilateral and bilateral PKP could effectively relieve the acute back pain and correct the KA. However, unilateral PKP presents more advantages, such as a short operation duration and reduced intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency and bone cement leakage.

摘要

为评估单侧和双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)治疗与脊柱侧弯相关的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)的临床和影像学效果,对52例行PKP治疗的与脊柱侧弯相关的OVCF患者进行回顾性分析。患者分为单侧PKP组(n = 26)和双侧PKP组(n = 26)。记录并比较两组的手术时间、骨水泥注射量和术中透视次数。此外,还评估了视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分以及术后并发症,包括骨水泥渗漏和相邻椎体骨折。与双侧组相比,单侧组的手术时间、骨水泥注射量和术中透视次数显著更低(P<0.001)。每组术后VAS评分、ODI评分、平均椎体高度和后凸角(KA)均得到改善,两组手术前后这些临床参数无差异。此外,单侧组骨水泥渗漏病例的比例显著低于双侧组(P<0.05)。随访期间,单侧组有3例(11.5%)、双侧组有2例(7.7%)发生相邻椎体骨折,但两组之间无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。对于治疗伴有脊柱侧弯的OVCF患者,单侧和双侧PKP均可有效缓解急性背痛并矫正KA。然而,单侧PKP具有更多优势,如手术时间短、术中透视次数减少以及骨水泥渗漏减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cd4/10294595/792c006d030f/etm-26-01-12034-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cd4/10294595/fbae46b88c67/etm-26-01-12034-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cd4/10294595/5eba71ada767/etm-26-01-12034-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cd4/10294595/69e3cd4bda34/etm-26-01-12034-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cd4/10294595/792c006d030f/etm-26-01-12034-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cd4/10294595/fbae46b88c67/etm-26-01-12034-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cd4/10294595/5eba71ada767/etm-26-01-12034-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cd4/10294595/69e3cd4bda34/etm-26-01-12034-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cd4/10294595/792c006d030f/etm-26-01-12034-g03.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of unilateral and bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures associated with scoliosis.单侧与双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗伴有脊柱侧凸的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较。
Exp Ther Med. 2023 May 22;26(1):335. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.12034. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
[Bilateral percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty through unilateral transverse process-extrapedicular approach for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture of lumbar].经单侧横突-椎弓根外侧入路双侧经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗腰椎骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 15;35(8):1007-1013. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202103028.
3
[Short-term effectiveness comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with posterior wall broken].单节段与双节段经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗后壁破裂骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的短期疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 15;34(10):1281-1287. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201907001.
4
[Effect of percutaneous kyphoplasty with different phases bone cement for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures].[不同时期骨水泥经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 15;34(4):435-441. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201909031.
5
[COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY AND PERCUTANEOUS KYPHOPLASTY FOR TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURE WITH INTRAVERTEBRAL VACUUM CLEFT].经皮椎体成形术与经皮后凸成形术治疗伴椎体内真空裂隙的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 8;30(9):1104-1110. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160225.
6
Comparative evaluation of an innovative deflectable percutaneous kyphoplasty versus conventional bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial.创新型可弯曲经皮椎体后凸成形术与传统双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较评估:一项前瞻性、随机对照试验。
Spine J. 2023 Apr;23(4):585-598. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.12.012. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
7
[Effectiveness comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for Kümmell disease].[单侧与双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗Kümmell病的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Sep 15;31(9):1086-1091. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201704055.
8
Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.单侧与双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)患者的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3439-3449. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4395-6. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
9
Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Decrease the Risk of Cemented Vertebra Refracture Compared with Bilateral Percutaneous Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.与双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术相比,经皮弯曲椎体成形术降低骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折治疗中骨水泥强化椎体再骨折的风险。
Clin Interv Aging. 2024 Feb 17;19:289-301. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S438036. eCollection 2024.
10
Comparison of percutaneous balloon dilation kyphoplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty in treatment for thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures.经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术与经皮椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折的比较。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Jul;22(1 Suppl):96-102. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201807_15370.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive systematic-review and meta-analysis: Treatment outcomes of unipedicular vs bipedicular approaches in vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.综合系统评价与荟萃分析:骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折椎体成形术和后凸成形术中单椎弓根与双椎弓根入路的治疗效果
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Apr 16;66:103010. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103010. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Review Update 2022.骨质疏松性椎体骨折的管理:2022年综述更新
Asian Spine J. 2022 Dec;16(6):934-946. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0441. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
2
Double-Balloon Kyphoplasty Results in Better Radiographic Outcomes Than a Single-Balloon Kyphoplasty in Treating Osteo-Porotic Spinal Fractures.在治疗骨质疏松性脊柱骨折方面,双球囊后凸成形术比单球囊后凸成形术能带来更好的影像学结果。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 14;11(12):3407. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123407.
3
Precise puncture combined with simplified percutaneous vertebroplasty to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a comparative analysis with conventional percutaneous vertebroplasty.
精准穿刺联合简化经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折:与传统经皮椎体成形术的对比分析
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Dec 15;13(12):14195-14202. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparison of unilateral and bilateral puncture percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.单侧与双侧穿刺经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较。
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2021 Jul;26(3):236-241. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2021.3.20200138.
5
Is It Necessary to Approach the Severe Osteoporotic Vertebral Biconcave-Shaped Fracture Bilaterally During the Process of PKP?在经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)过程中,是否有必要双侧处理严重骨质疏松性椎体双凹形骨折?
J Pain Res. 2021 Jun 4;14:1601-1610. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S293528. eCollection 2021.
6
The Correlation Between the Diffusion Coefficient of Bone Cement and Efficacy in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty.骨水泥弥散系数与经皮椎体成形术疗效的相关性。
Orthopedics. 2021 Jan 1;44(1):e95-e100. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20201009-02. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
7
Comparison of efficacies of unipedicular kyphoplasty and bipedicular kyphoplasty for treatment of single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.单侧椎弓根椎体后凸成形术与双侧椎弓根椎体后凸成形术治疗单节段骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较:一项符合STROBE标准的回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 18;99(38):e22046. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022046.
8
Idiopathic Scoliosis as a Rotatory Decompensation of the Spine.特发性脊柱侧凸是脊柱旋转性失代偿。
J Bone Miner Res. 2020 Oct;35(10):1850-1857. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4137. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
Percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures improves spino-pelvic alignment and global sagittal balance maximally in the thoracolumbar region.经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折可最大限度地改善胸腰段脊柱-骨盆排列和整体矢状位平衡。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):e0228341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228341. eCollection 2020.
10
Percutaneous vertebral augmentation in special Genant IV osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.特殊Genant IV型骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的经皮椎体强化术
J Orthop Translat. 2019 Aug 6;20:94-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2019.07.002. eCollection 2020 Jan.