• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Content Quality of Web-Based Short-Form Videos for Fire and Burn Prevention in China: Content Analysis.基于网络的短视频在中国火灾和烧伤预防中的内容质量:内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 30;25:e47343. doi: 10.2196/47343.
2
Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study in China.TikTok和哔哩哔哩上乳腺癌相关视频的可靠性和质量评估:中国的横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 22;11:1296386. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1296386. eCollection 2023.
3
Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.肝癌相关短视频在 TikTok 和 Bilibili 上的质量与可靠性:一项横断面内容分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 5;25:e47210. doi: 10.2196/47210.
4
Investigating Turf Burn-Related Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.调查TikTok上与草坪擦伤相关的视频:横断面研究。
JMIR Dermatol. 2022 Apr 22;5(2):e36218. doi: 10.2196/36218.
5
TikTok and Bilibili as sources of information on Helicobacter pylori in China: A content and quality analysis.中国的TikTok和哔哩哔哩作为幽门螺杆菌信息来源:内容与质量分析
Helicobacter. 2023 Oct;28(5):e13007. doi: 10.1111/hel.13007. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
6
A Review and Quality Assessment of TikTok Videos for Burn Education.烧伤教育类 TikTok 视频的回顾与质量评估
J Burn Care Res. 2024 Jan 5;45(1):4-7. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad150.
7
Short video platforms as sources of health information about cervical cancer: A content and quality analysis.短视频平台作为宫颈癌健康信息来源:内容和质量分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0300180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300180. eCollection 2024.
8
Factors Driving Citizen Engagement With Government TikTok Accounts During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Model Development and Analysis.新冠疫情期间推动公民与政府 TikTok 账户互动的因素:模型开发与分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 4;23(2):e21463. doi: 10.2196/21463.
9
Douyin and Bilibili as sources of information on lung cancer in China through assessment and analysis of the content and quality.通过评估和分析内容与质量,研究中国的肺癌患者如何利用抖音和哔哩哔哩获取信息。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 4;14(1):20604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70640-y.
10
The Fire Challenge: A Case Report and Analysis of Self-Inflicted Flame Injury Posted on Social Media.“火焰挑战”:一则关于社交媒体上自我烧伤事件的病例报告与分析
J Burn Care Res. 2016 Mar-Apr;37(2):e161-5. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000324.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Awareness and Application of the Heimlich Maneuver: A Survey of Shenzhen Residents.公众对海姆立克急救法的认知与应用:深圳居民调查
Cureus. 2025 Jul 29;17(7):e88957. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88957. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
User's Search for Information: A Multi-Language Cross-Sectional Assessment of Websites about Healthcare-Associated Infections.用户对信息的搜索:关于医疗相关感染的网站的多语言横断面评估
J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2024 Jan 30;10(1):85-95. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2024-0011. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Short video platforms as sources of health information about cervical cancer: A content and quality analysis.短视频平台作为宫颈癌健康信息来源:内容和质量分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0300180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300180. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A study on the impact of official promotion short videos on tourists' destination decision-making in the post-epidemic era.疫情后时代官方推广短视频对游客目的地决策影响的研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 24;13:1015869. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015869. eCollection 2022.
2
YouTube provides insufficient information on patellofemoral instability.YouTube 提供的髌股关节不稳定信息不足。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2022 Sep;56(5):306-310. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2022.22005.
3
Dilemma and Solution of Copyright Justice System for Health Short Video under Network Big Data Environment Monitoring.网络大数据环境监测下健康短视频版权公正制度的困境与解决对策
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;2022:9640574. doi: 10.1155/2022/9640574. eCollection 2022.
4
Quality and Audience Engagement of Takotsubo Syndrome-Related Videos on TikTok: Content Analysis.《TikTok 上与 Takotsubo 综合征相关视频的质量和观众参与度:内容分析》
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 26;24(9):e39360. doi: 10.2196/39360.
5
Quality of Internet Videos Related to Pediatric Urology in Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国大陆小儿泌尿外科相关互联网视频质量的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;10:924748. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.924748. eCollection 2022.
6
The Current State of Vascular Surgery Presence in Bilibili Video Platform of China.中国哔哩哔哩视频平台上血管外科的现状
Front Surg. 2022 Apr 28;9:874113. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.874113. eCollection 2022.
7
Is the information about orthodontics on Youtube and TikTok reliable for the oral health of the public? A cross sectional comparative study.Youtube 和 TikTok 上有关牙齿矫正的信息对公众的口腔健康可靠吗?一项横断面比较研究。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Oct;123(5):e349-e354. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
8
Cross-sectional and comparative analysis of videos on erectile dysfunction treatment on YouTube and TikTok.YouTube 和 TikTok 上治疗勃起功能障碍视频的横断面和对比分析。
Andrologia. 2022 Jun;54(5):e14392. doi: 10.1111/and.14392. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
9
Short-Video Apps as a Health Information Source for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Information Quality Assessment of TikTok Videos.短视频应用作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病的健康信息来源:TikTok 视频的信息质量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 20;23(12):e28318. doi: 10.2196/28318.
10
Expert consensus on the prevention and first-aid management of burns in children.儿童烧伤预防与急救处理专家共识。
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 15;23(12):1191-1199. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2109026.

基于网络的短视频在中国火灾和烧伤预防中的内容质量:内容分析。

Content Quality of Web-Based Short-Form Videos for Fire and Burn Prevention in China: Content Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Nosocomial Infection Control Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 30;25:e47343. doi: 10.2196/47343.

DOI:10.2196/47343
PMID:37389906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10365633/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Web-based short-form videos are increasingly popular for disseminating fire and burn prevention information, but their content quality is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to systematically assess the characteristics, content quality, and public impact of web-based short-form videos offering primary and secondary (first aid) prevention recommendations for fires and burns in China between 2018 and 2021.

METHODS

We retrieved short-form videos offering both primary and secondary (first aid) information to prevent fire and burn injuries published on the 3 most popular web-based short-form video platforms in China: TikTok, Kwai, and Bilibili. To assess video content quality, we calculated the proportion of short-form videos that included information on each of the 15 recommendations for burn prevention education from the World Health Organization (WHO; P) and that correctly disseminated each recommendation (P). High P and P indicated better content quality. To assess their public impact, we calculated the median (IQR) of 3 indicators: the number of comments, likes, and saves as a favorite by viewers. Chi-square test, trend chi-square test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test examined differences in indicators across the 3 platforms, years, content, and time duration of videos and between videos disseminating correct versus incorrect information.

RESULTS

Overall, 1459 eligible short-form videos were included. The number of short-form videos increased by 16 times between 2018 and 2021. Of them, 93.97% (n=1371) were about secondary prevention (first aid) and 86.02% (n=1255) lasted <2 minutes. The proportion of short-form videos including each of the 15 WHO recommendations ranged from 0% to 77.86% (n=1136). Recommendations 8, 13, and 11 had the highest proportions (n=1136, 77.86%; n=827, 56.68%; and n=801, 54.9%, respectively), whereas recommendations 3 and 5 were never mentioned. Among the short-form videos that included the WHO recommendations, recommendations 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 were always disseminated correctly, but the other 9 recommendations were correctly disseminated in 59.11% (120/203) to 98.68% (1121/1136) of videos. The proportion of short-form videos including and correctly disseminating the WHO recommendations varied across platforms and years. The public impact of short videos varied greatly across videos, with a median (IQR) of 5 (0-34) comments, 62 (7-841) likes, and 4 (0-27) saves as a favorite. Short-form videos disseminating correct recommendations had larger public impact than those disseminating either partially correct or incorrect knowledge (median 5 vs 4 comments, 68 vs 51 likes, and 5 vs 3 saves as a favorite, respectively; all P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the rapid increase in the number of web-based short-form videos about fire and burn prevention available in China, their content quality and public impact were generally low. Systematic efforts are recommended to improve the content quality and public impact of short-form videos on injury prevention topics such as fire and burn prevention.

摘要

背景

基于网络的短视频越来越受欢迎,用于传播火灾和烧伤预防信息,但这些视频的内容质量尚不清楚。

目的

我们旨在系统评估 2018 年至 2021 年间中国发布的关于火灾和烧伤初级和(急救)预防建议的基于网络的短视频的特点、内容质量和公众影响力。

方法

我们检索了在中国 3 个最受欢迎的基于网络的短视频平台(TikTok、快手上的 Kwai 和 B 站)上发布的提供初级和(急救)预防火灾和烧伤信息的短视频。为了评估视频内容质量,我们计算了包含世界卫生组织(WHO)15 项烧伤预防教育建议的短视频比例(P)和正确传播每个建议的比例(P)。高 P 和 P 表示更好的内容质量。为了评估其公众影响力,我们计算了 3 个指标的中位数(IQR):评论、点赞和收藏的数量。卡方检验、趋势卡方检验和 Kruskal-Wallis H 检验用于检验 3 个平台、年份、内容和视频时长以及传播正确和不正确信息的视频之间的指标差异。

结果

共纳入 1459 个合格短视频。2018 年至 2021 年间,短视频数量增加了 16 倍。其中,93.97%(n=1371)为二级预防(急救)短视频,86.02%(n=1255)时长<2 分钟。包含 WHO 15 项建议的短视频比例为 0%至 77.86%(n=1136)。建议 8、13 和 11 的比例最高(n=1136,77.86%;n=827,56.68%;n=801,54.9%),而建议 3 和 5 从未被提及。在包含 WHO 建议的短视频中,建议 1、2、4、6、9 和 12 总是正确传播,但其他 9 项建议在 59.11%(120/203)至 98.68%(1121/1136)的视频中得到正确传播。包含和正确传播 WHO 建议的短视频比例在不同平台和年份之间存在差异。短视频的公众影响力在视频之间差异很大,中位数(IQR)为 5(0-34)条评论、62(7-841)个赞和 4(0-27)个收藏。传播正确建议的短视频比传播部分正确或错误知识的短视频具有更大的公众影响力(中位数 5 条评论对 4 条评论,68 个赞对 51 个赞,5 个收藏对 3 个收藏,均 P<.05)。

结论

尽管中国有关火灾和烧伤预防的基于网络的短视频数量迅速增加,但它们的内容质量和公众影响力普遍较低。建议系统地努力提高有关火灾和烧伤预防等伤害预防主题的短视频的内容质量和公众影响力。