Suppr超能文献

非心源性胸痛的调查——哪种食管检查?

Investigation of non-cardiac chest pain--which oesophageal test?

作者信息

Lee R J, Collins B J, Spence R A, Crookes P F, Campbell N P, Adgey A A

出版信息

Ulster Med J. 1986 Apr;55(1):49-56.

Abstract

Five different tests were used to evaluate oesophageal function in 22 patients who presented to a cardiac unit with acute chest pain but whose cardiological investigations were negative. Eight patients had an abnormality on oesophagoscopy, 10 had an abnormal pH monitoring study, six had a positive acid infusion test, 10 had an abnormal manometric study and six had an abnormal oseophageal transit scintiscan. Concordance for the three tests of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was low at 28%, and for the two tests of oesophageal motility only 55%. Only two patients had normal results in all five tests.

摘要

采用五种不同的检测方法对22例因急性胸痛就诊于心脏科但心脏检查结果为阴性的患者进行食管功能评估。8例患者食管镜检查异常,10例pH监测研究异常,6例酸灌注试验阳性,10例测压研究异常,6例食管通过闪烁扫描异常。胃食管反流病三项检测的一致性较低,为28%,食管动力两项检测的一致性仅为55%。只有2例患者五项检测结果均正常。

相似文献

7
Provocation tests versus 24-h pH and pressure measurements.激发试验与24小时pH值及压力测量
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995 Dec;7(12):1141-6. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199512000-00003.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验