Suppr超能文献

非心源性胸痛的调查——哪种食管检查?

Investigation of non-cardiac chest pain--which oesophageal test?

作者信息

Lee R J, Collins B J, Spence R A, Crookes P F, Campbell N P, Adgey A A

出版信息

Ulster Med J. 1986 Apr;55(1):49-56.

Abstract

Five different tests were used to evaluate oesophageal function in 22 patients who presented to a cardiac unit with acute chest pain but whose cardiological investigations were negative. Eight patients had an abnormality on oesophagoscopy, 10 had an abnormal pH monitoring study, six had a positive acid infusion test, 10 had an abnormal manometric study and six had an abnormal oseophageal transit scintiscan. Concordance for the three tests of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was low at 28%, and for the two tests of oesophageal motility only 55%. Only two patients had normal results in all five tests.

摘要

采用五种不同的检测方法对22例因急性胸痛就诊于心脏科但心脏检查结果为阴性的患者进行食管功能评估。8例患者食管镜检查异常,10例pH监测研究异常,6例酸灌注试验阳性,10例测压研究异常,6例食管通过闪烁扫描异常。胃食管反流病三项检测的一致性较低,为28%,食管动力两项检测的一致性仅为55%。只有2例患者五项检测结果均正常。

相似文献

7
Provocation tests versus 24-h pH and pressure measurements.激发试验与24小时pH值及压力测量
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995 Dec;7(12):1141-6. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199512000-00003.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验