Lynch Andrew R, Bradford Shermineh, Zhou Amber S, Oxendine Kim, Henderson Les, Horner Vanessa L, Weaver Beth A, Burkard Mark E
Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
bioRxiv. 2023 Jun 15:2023.06.15.544840. doi: 10.1101/2023.06.15.544840.
Chromosomal instability (CIN) is the persistent reshuffling of cancer karyotypes via chromosome mis-segregation during cell division. In cancer, CIN exists at varying levels that have differential effects on tumor progression. However, mis-segregation rates remain challenging to assess in human cancer despite an array of available measures. We evaluated measures of CIN by comparing quantitative methods using specific, inducible phenotypic CIN models of chromosome bridges, pseudobipolar spindles, multipolar spindles, and polar chromosomes. For each, we measured CIN fixed and timelapse fluorescence microscopy, chromosome spreads, 6-centromere FISH, bulk transcriptomics, and single cell DNA sequencing (scDNAseq). As expected, microscopy of tumor cells in live and fixed samples correlated well (R=0.77; p<0.01) and sensitively detect CIN. Cytogenetics approaches include chromosome spreads and 6-centromere FISH, which also correlate well (R=0.77; p<0.01) but had limited sensitivity for lower rates of CIN. Bulk genomic DNA signatures and bulk transcriptomic scores, CIN70 and HET70, did not detect CIN. By contrast, single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNAseq) detects CIN with high sensitivity, and correlates very well with imaging methods (R=0.83; p<0.01). In summary, single-cell methods such as imaging, cytogenetics, and scDNAseq can measure CIN, with the latter being the most comprehensive method accessible to clinical samples. To facilitate comparison of CIN rates between phenotypes and methods, we propose a standardized unit of CIN: Mis-segregations per Diploid Division (MDD). This systematic analysis of common CIN measures highlights the superiority of single-cell methods and provides guidance for measuring CIN in the clinical setting.
染色体不稳定性(CIN)是指在细胞分裂过程中,通过染色体错配分离导致癌症核型持续重排的现象。在癌症中,CIN存在不同水平,对肿瘤进展有不同影响。然而,尽管有一系列可用的测量方法,但在人类癌症中评估错配分离率仍然具有挑战性。我们通过比较使用特定的、可诱导的染色体桥、假双极纺锤体、多极纺锤体和极染色体表型CIN模型的定量方法来评估CIN测量方法。对于每种模型,我们通过固定和延时荧光显微镜、染色体铺展、六着丝粒荧光原位杂交(FISH)、批量转录组学和单细胞DNA测序(scDNAseq)来测量CIN。正如预期的那样,活样本和固定样本中肿瘤细胞的显微镜检查相关性良好(R = 0.77;p < 0.01),并且能够灵敏地检测到CIN。细胞遗传学方法包括染色体铺展和六着丝粒FISH,它们也具有良好的相关性(R = 0.77;p < 0.01),但对于较低CIN率的检测灵敏度有限。批量基因组DNA特征和批量转录组学评分,即CIN70和HET70,无法检测到CIN。相比之下,单细胞DNA测序(scDNAseq)能够高度灵敏地检测CIN,并且与成像方法相关性非常好(R = 0.83;p < 0.01)。总之,成像、细胞遗传学和scDNAseq等单细胞方法可以测量CIN,其中scDNAseq是临床样本可用的最全面的方法。为便于比较不同表型和方法之间的CIN率,我们提出了一个CIN的标准化单位:每二倍体分裂错配分离数(MDD)。这种对常见CIN测量方法的系统分析突出了单细胞方法的优越性,并为临床环境中测量CIN提供了指导。