• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速抗原检测对有症状和无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染的检测性能:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests to Detect Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection : A Prospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Program in Digital Medicine, Department of Medicine; Division of Health Systems Science, Department of Medicine; and Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts (A.S.).

Program in Digital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts (C.H., C.P., P.S., T.O., C.W., S.T., S.B., A.F., S.P.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2023 Jul;176(7):975-982. doi: 10.7326/M23-0385. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

DOI:10.7326/M23-0385
PMID:37399548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10321467/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The performance of rapid antigen tests (Ag-RDTs) for screening asymptomatic and symptomatic persons for SARS-CoV-2 is not well established.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of Ag-RDTs for detection of SARS-CoV-2 among symptomatic and asymptomatic participants.

DESIGN

This prospective cohort study enrolled participants between October 2021 and January 2022. Participants completed Ag-RDTs and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for SARS-CoV-2 every 48 hours for 15 days.

SETTING

Participants were enrolled digitally throughout the mainland United States. They self-collected anterior nasal swabs for Ag-RDTs and RT-PCR testing. Nasal swabs for RT-PCR were shipped to a central laboratory, whereas Ag-RDTs were done at home.

PARTICIPANTS

Of 7361 participants in the study, 5353 who were asymptomatic and negative for SARS-CoV-2 on study day 1 were eligible. In total, 154 participants had at least 1 positive RT-PCR result.

MEASUREMENTS

The sensitivity of Ag-RDTs was measured on the basis of testing once (same-day), twice (after 48 hours), and thrice (after a total of 96 hours). The analysis was repeated for different days past index PCR positivity (DPIPPs) to approximate real-world scenarios where testing initiation may not always coincide with DPIPP 0. Results were stratified by symptom status.

RESULTS

Among 154 participants who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 97 were asymptomatic and 57 had symptoms at infection onset. Serial testing with Ag-RDTs twice 48 hours apart resulted in an aggregated sensitivity of 93.4% (95% CI, 90.4% to 95.9%) among symptomatic participants on DPIPPs 0 to 6. When singleton positive results were excluded, the aggregated sensitivity on DPIPPs 0 to 6 for 2-time serial testing among asymptomatic participants was lower at 62.7% (CI, 57.0% to 70.5%), but it improved to 79.0% (CI, 70.1% to 87.4%) with testing 3 times at 48-hour intervals.

LIMITATION

Participants tested every 48 hours; therefore, these data cannot support conclusions about serial testing intervals shorter than 48 hours.

CONCLUSION

The performance of Ag-RDTs was optimized when asymptomatic participants tested 3 times at 48-hour intervals and when symptomatic participants tested 2 times separated by 48 hours.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health RADx Tech program.

摘要

背景

快速抗原检测(Ag-RDT)用于筛查无症状和有症状的 SARS-CoV-2 患者的效果尚未得到充分证实。

目的

评估 Ag-RDT 检测有症状和无症状参与者中 SARS-CoV-2 的性能。

设计

这项前瞻性队列研究招募了 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 1 月期间的参与者。参与者每 48 小时完成一次 Ag-RDT 和逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测 SARS-CoV-2,共 15 天。

地点

参与者通过数字方式遍布美国大陆招募。他们自行采集前鼻拭子进行 Ag-RDT 和 RT-PCR 检测。用于 RT-PCR 的鼻拭子被运送到一个中央实验室,而 Ag-RDT 则在家里进行。

参与者

在研究中,共有 7361 名参与者,其中 5353 名在研究第 1 天无症状且 SARS-CoV-2 检测结果为阴性,符合条件。共有 154 名参与者至少有 1 次 RT-PCR 检测结果为阳性。

测量

根据单次(当日)、两次(48 小时后)和三次(总共 96 小时后)检测来测量 Ag-RDT 的敏感性。为了近似于检测启动不一定总是与 DPIPP 0 同时发生的真实情况,针对不同的过去指数 PCR 阳性天数(DPIPPs)重复了分析。结果按症状状态分层。

结果

在 154 名 SARS-CoV-2 检测阳性的参与者中,97 名无症状,57 名在感染初期出现症状。两次 48 小时间隔的 Ag-RDT 重复检测在 DPIPPs 0 至 6 时,症状性参与者的汇总敏感性为 93.4%(95%CI,90.4%至 95.9%)。当排除单阳性结果时,无症状参与者两次重复检测在 DPIPPs 0 至 6 的汇总敏感性较低,为 62.7%(CI,57.0%至 70.5%),但在 48 小时间隔三次检测时,敏感性提高至 79.0%(CI,70.1%至 87.4%)。

局限性

参与者每 48 小时检测一次;因此,这些数据不能支持关于间隔小于 48 小时的重复检测的结论。

结论

无症状参与者每 48 小时检测 3 次,有症状参与者每 48 小时检测 2 次时,Ag-RDT 的性能得到优化。

主要资金来源

美国国立卫生研究院 RADxTech 计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5176/10321467/ca7286149e02/aim-olf-M230385-AIME202307180-M230385_visual-abstract.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5176/10321467/ca7286149e02/aim-olf-M230385-AIME202307180-M230385_visual-abstract.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5176/10321467/ca7286149e02/aim-olf-M230385-AIME202307180-M230385_visual-abstract.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests to Detect Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection : A Prospective Cohort Study.快速抗原检测对有症状和无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染的检测性能:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Jul;176(7):975-982. doi: 10.7326/M23-0385. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
2
Comparison of Rapid Antigen Tests' Performance Between Delta and Omicron Variants of SARS-CoV-2 : A Secondary Analysis From a Serial Home Self-testing Study.德尔塔和奥密克戎变异株 SARS-CoV-2 的快速抗原检测性能比较:一项连续家庭自测研究的二次分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Dec;175(12):1685-1692. doi: 10.7326/M22-0760. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
3
Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests to Detect Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection.用于检测有症状和无症状SARS-CoV-2感染的快速抗原检测的性能
medRxiv. 2023 Jan 23:2022.08.05.22278466. doi: 10.1101/2022.08.05.22278466.
4
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
5
Performance of and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Diagnostics Based on Symptom Onset and Close Contact Exposure: An Analysis From the Test Us at Home Prospective Cohort Study.基于症状发作和密切接触暴露的新型冠状病毒2诊断性能:来自“在家检测我们”前瞻性队列研究的分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 May 31;11(6):ofae304. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae304. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Comparative Diagnostic Utility of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen and Molecular Testing in a Community Setting.社区环境中 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原与分子检测的比较诊断效用。
J Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 16;230(2):363-373. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae150.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of Panbio™ rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 in paediatric population.Panbio™ 快速抗原检测试剂盒用于儿童人群中 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断准确性。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Aug 29;23(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04201-z.
8
Comparison of Home Antigen Testing With RT-PCR and Viral Culture During the Course of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.在 SARS-CoV-2 感染过程中,家庭抗原检测与 RT-PCR 和病毒培养的比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Jul 1;182(7):701-709. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1827.
9
Performance of an Antigen-Based Test for Asymptomatic and Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Testing at Two University Campuses - Wisconsin, September-October 2020.基于抗原的无症状和有症状 SARS-CoV-2 检测在两个大学校园的表现 - 威斯康星州,2020 年 9 月至 10 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 1;69(5152):1642-1647. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm695152a3.
10
Accuracy of rapid point-of-care antigen-based diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression analyzing influencing factors.基于快速床边抗原检测的 SARS-CoV-2 准确性:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析,以及荟萃回归分析影响因素。
PLoS Med. 2022 May 26;19(5):e1004011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004011. eCollection 2022 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Evaluation of the Healgen Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test as a Point-of-Care Diagnostic Tool.Healgen新冠病毒快速抗原检测作为即时诊断工具的临床评估
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2025 Jul;13(7):e70228. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70228.
2
Emerging Trends in Point-of-Care Technology Development for Oncology in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.低收入和中等收入国家肿瘤学即时护理技术发展的新趋势
JCO Glob Oncol. 2025 Jun;11:e2500142. doi: 10.1200/GO-25-00142. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
3
Oncolytic viruses: a promising therapy for malignant pleural effusion and solid tumors.
溶瘤病毒:治疗恶性胸腔积液和实体瘤的一种有前景的疗法。
Front Immunol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1570698. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1570698. eCollection 2025.
4
An agent-based model to assess the impact of shared staff and occupancy rate on infectious disease burden in nursing homes.一种基于主体的模型,用于评估共享员工和入住率对养老院传染病负担的影响。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10786-w.
5
High-frequency PCR-testing as a powerful approach for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the field of critical infrastructure: A longitudinal, retrospective study in a German tertiary care hospital.高频聚合酶链反应检测作为关键基础设施领域中新型冠状病毒2监测的有力方法:德国一家三级护理医院的纵向回顾性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 6;20(2):e0317009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317009. eCollection 2025.
6
Rapid Amplification and Detection of Single-Stranded Nucleic Acids for Point-of-Care Diagnosis.用于即时诊断的单链核酸的快速扩增与检测
Small Methods. 2025 Jun;9(6):e2401733. doi: 10.1002/smtd.202401733. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for detection of Delta and Omicron variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2: Direct evidence from prospective clinical settings.快速抗原检测对德尔塔和奥密克戎变异株严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的检测诊断准确性:来自前瞻性临床环境的直接证据。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 4;103(40):e39995. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039995.
8
Point-of-care breath sample analysis by semiconductor-based E-Nose technology discriminates non-infected subjects from SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia patients: a multi-analyst experiment.基于半导体的电子鼻技术对即时护理呼吸样本进行分析,可区分未感染的受试者与新冠病毒肺炎患者:一项多分析人员实验。
MedComm (2020). 2024 Oct 24;5(11):e726. doi: 10.1002/mco2.726. eCollection 2024 Nov.
9
COVID-19 and Cancer Care: A Review and Practical Guide to Caring for Cancer Patients in the Era of COVID-19.COVID-19 与癌症护理:COVID-19 时代癌症患者护理的综述与实用指南。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Sep 10;31(9):5330-5343. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31090393.
10
A novel comparison framework for epidemiological strategies applied to age-based restrictions versus horizontal lockdowns.一种用于比较将基于年龄的限制措施与全面封锁应用于流行病学策略的新型框架。
Infect Dis Model. 2024 Jul 20;9(4):1301-1328. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2024.07.002. eCollection 2024 Dec.