• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辅助生殖技术的广泛应用对捷克近年来生育率增长的影响。

The influence of the increasing use of assisted reproduction technologies on the recent growth in fertility in Czechia.

机构信息

Department of Demography and Geodemography, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 5;13(1):10854. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37071-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-37071-7
PMID:37407590
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10322988/
Abstract

This study aims to enhance the understanding of how the increasing use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) has contributed to the increase in the total fertility rate (TFR) and to further delaying childbearing. Moreover, it addresses the gap in the methodology concerning the quantification of the effect of ART on fertility postponement. Czechia is one of few countries that are able to serve for the study of the demographic impacts of ART. ART and non-ART fertility rates were calculated using unique data on all children born in Czechia. Excluding mothers who received cross-border reproductive care, the proportion of ART live births in Czechia has not exceeded 4%. However, without ART the TFR would have stood at just 1.65 instead of 1.71 in 2020. ART significantly contributed to a reduction in childlessness and to the increase in fertility rates at ages over 35. Applying the decomposition method, the contribution of the use of ART to delaying childbearing between 2013 and 2020 was 4%. The findings have important policy implications. ART has the potential to support fertility recovery in the context of delayed childbearing. The findings served to alleviate concerns about the contribution of ART to the further undesired delay of childbearing.

摘要

本研究旨在深入了解辅助生殖技术(ART)的广泛应用如何导致总生育率(TFR)的增加和生育的进一步推迟。此外,本研究还解决了关于量化 ART 对生育推迟影响的方法学上的差距。捷克是少数几个能够研究 ART 对人口影响的国家之一。使用关于捷克所有儿童出生的独特数据,计算了 ART 和非-ART 的生育率。如果不考虑接受跨境生殖保健的母亲,捷克的 ART 活产比例从未超过 4%。然而,如果没有 ART,2020 年的 TFR 将仅为 1.65,而不是 1.71。ART 显著有助于减少不孕,并提高 35 岁以上的生育率。通过应用分解方法,2013 年至 2020 年期间,ART 的使用对生育推迟的贡献为 4%。这些发现具有重要的政策意义。ART 有可能在延迟生育的背景下支持生育力的恢复。这些发现缓解了对 ART 进一步导致生育推迟的担忧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f7/10322988/372671c29aec/41598_2023_37071_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f7/10322988/978d71b65f5a/41598_2023_37071_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f7/10322988/920e3a012650/41598_2023_37071_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f7/10322988/6f23e34664e0/41598_2023_37071_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f7/10322988/372671c29aec/41598_2023_37071_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f7/10322988/978d71b65f5a/41598_2023_37071_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f7/10322988/920e3a012650/41598_2023_37071_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f7/10322988/6f23e34664e0/41598_2023_37071_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f7/10322988/372671c29aec/41598_2023_37071_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of the increasing use of assisted reproduction technologies on the recent growth in fertility in Czechia.辅助生殖技术的广泛应用对捷克近年来生育率增长的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 5;13(1):10854. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37071-7.
2
Can increased use of ART retrieve the Czech Republic from the low fertility trap?增加抗逆转录病毒疗法的使用能否使捷克共和国摆脱低生育率困境?
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2009;30(6):739-48.
3
Population-wide contribution of medically assisted reproductive technologies to overall births in Australia: temporal trends and parental characteristics.澳大利亚全民医疗辅助生殖技术对总出生人数的贡献:时间趋势和父母特征。
Hum Reprod. 2022 May 3;37(5):1047-1058. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac032.
4
Demographic relevancy of increased use of assisted reproduction in European countries.欧洲国家辅助生殖技术使用增加的人口统计学相关性。
Reprod Health. 2014 May 26;11:37. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-37.
5
Reproduction ageing in Czechia in the European context.在欧洲背景下捷克的生殖衰老情况。
Cas Lek Cesk. 2019 Summer;158(3-4):126-132.
6
Has the cesarean epidemic in Czechia been reversed despite fertility postponement?捷克的剖宫产热潮是否在生育推迟的情况下得到了逆转?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jun 6;22(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04781-1.
7
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - 
United States, 2013.辅助生殖技术监测报告——美国,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Dec 4;64(11):1-25. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6411a1.
8
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.辅助生殖技术监测--美国,2010 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 Dec 6;62(9):1-24.
9
The effect of postponement of first motherhood on permanent involuntary childlessness and total fertility rate in six European countries since the 1970s.自 20 世纪 70 年代以来,推迟首次生育对六个欧洲国家永久性无法生育和总生育率的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2012 Apr;27(4):1179-83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der455. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
10
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.辅助生殖技术监测——美国,2011 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges of Egg, Sperm, and Embryo Donation from the Perspective of Iranian Experts: A Qualitative Study.从伊朗专家视角看卵子、精子和胚胎捐赠的挑战:一项定性研究
Arch Iran Med. 2025 Jun 1;28(6):356-366. doi: 10.34172/aim.33938.
2
Estimating the Fiscal Value of Children Conceived from Assisted Reproduction Technology in Australia Applying a Public Economic Perspective.从公共经济视角评估澳大利亚辅助生殖技术所孕育儿童的财政价值。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2025 Apr 18;12(1):148-154. doi: 10.36469/001c.133796. eCollection 2025.
3
Alignment, Anticipation, Adaptation, or Lagging Behind? Age-Based Regulations in Assisted Reproduction and Late Fertility.

本文引用的文献

1
Financial constraint and perceptions of COVID-19.财务限制与对 COVID-19 的认知。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 1;13(1):3432. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30118-9.
2
Projecting the Contribution of Assisted Reproductive Technology to Completed Cohort Fertility.预测辅助生殖技术对完整队列生育率的贡献。
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2023;42(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s11113-023-09765-3. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
3
Effects of pandemics uncertainty on fertility.大流行的不确定性对生育率的影响。
对齐、预期、适应还是落后?辅助生殖与晚育中基于年龄的规定
Popul Dev Rev. 2024 Dec;50(4):1319-1351. doi: 10.1111/padr.12658. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
4
The association between preterm births and assisted reproductive technologies.早产与辅助生殖技术之间的关联。
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2024 Nov;168(4):332-341. doi: 10.5507/bp.2023.039. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 30;10:854771. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.854771. eCollection 2022.
4
The Future of Assisted Reproductive Technology Live Births in the United States.美国辅助生殖技术活产的未来。
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022;41(5):2289-2309. doi: 10.1007/s11113-022-09731-5. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
5
ART in Europe, 2018: results generated from European registries by ESHRE.2018年欧洲辅助生殖技术:欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会(ESHRE)基于欧洲登记处得出的结果
Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Jul 5;2022(3):hoac022. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac022. eCollection 2022.
6
Association of adverse birth outcomes with in vitro fertilization after controlling infertility factors based on a singleton live birth cohort.控制基于单胎活产队列的不孕因素后,不良出生结局与体外受精的关系。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 16;12(1):4528. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08707-x.
7
Population-wide contribution of medically assisted reproductive technologies to overall births in Australia: temporal trends and parental characteristics.澳大利亚全民医疗辅助生殖技术对总出生人数的贡献:时间趋势和父母特征。
Hum Reprod. 2022 May 3;37(5):1047-1058. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac032.
8
Not Just Later, but Fewer: Novel Trends in Cohort Fertility in the Nordic Countries.不仅仅是推迟,而是减少:北欧国家队列生育率的新趋势。
Demography. 2021 Aug 1;58(4):1373-1399. doi: 10.1215/00703370-9373618.
9
The demographics of assisted reproductive technology births in a Nordic country.北欧国家辅助生殖技术生育的人口统计学。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Jun 1;35(6):1441-1450. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa055.
10
The realization of fertility intentions in the context of childbearing postponement: comparison of transitional and post-transitional populations.生育推迟背景下生育意愿的实现:转型期与后转型期人群的比较
J Biosoc Sci. 2021 Jan;53(1):82-97. doi: 10.1017/S002193202000005X. Epub 2020 Mar 10.